CO2It’s been quiet about Global Warming.
But i’ve noticed that media covers it during warmer moments and after some disaster. So it’s trendy. And i observe ever growing extreme commerce about the issue.

Both believers and non believers of men made global warming have always had my attention.
I wrote my first article about it in may 2013 and about energy.

You can read it here (Dutch).

This post is a follow up and explains exactly what CO2 is from basic chemical and biological education.

We are then going to work on some numbers I haven’t seen done by anyone yet (!!)
Next is using data from the IPCC, NASA, MIT, National Geophysical Data Center, Aspen Global Change Institute and Berkley University.

I just wanted to explore what’s what and what’s not. If I’m wrong, I am wrong and will adjust my view.

In my earlier article I wrote to have had experiences of very hot summers during the 90s in Northern and Southern Europe. We saw very high temperatures. In the 80s, we had colder winters and less hot summers. However, this all can be explained by the El Nino effect. Basically a cycle of colder and warmer seasons over 7 years.

In that article I also disclosed the entire network of eco-politics-media-commerce closely tied in the highest levels. I’m not going to repeat that here, do read that article first perhaps.

Reading that post myself again, I still stand behind all the text, but I want to share my further knowledge on the subject. And i worked some numbers no one seemed to have done before (!!)

Why media is most always biased and hardly serves public interest is explained in this article: Welcome tot the Real world.

I’m not in the game of proving right or wrong, but I am in the game of constant learning and justification. And I do believe in underlying ratio, math, logic and plausibility since full proof never exists.
All we can do is add up knowledge, data and see for ourselves, instead of the lazy thing of laying on the couch and absorbing what media shows us.

And a good thing is I paid high attention during chemistry and bio college, and statistics as well to understand basics where 1 + 1 is still two.

Chemistry: CO2 and the fundamentals of Earth & Life

Szén_atomCO2 is a simple bond (mix) made from 3 chemical smallest possible parts (atoms) of the 2 elements C and O.
1 part Carbon, 2 parts Oxygen.

Carbon (C) itself is in almost all materials on earth.
No life as we know is possible without it.

C is the central building element of earth and life.
Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Phosphor (P), Sulphur (S)

do the rest, literary. O is what we breath. P is the main element for soil fertilising (farm land).

C is essentially prevalent for life !

C plays the central role, because that chemicals element bonds the easiest and therefore is found in most materials on earth. I’m not claiming C is the most trouble-free chemical element. But it is a prime factor for life. You hardly find any article in your home without C, except perhaps water and drinks without bubbles. Water should be cleaned from C anyway.

So C, H, O, P, S are all prime elements for life but C simply acts as the easiest, compared to most all chemical elements we know of.

Electrons always spin very regular around their core (nucleus) and super fast but not always in a perfect spaced orbit. In this way they more form a cloud around the nucleus.
For Carbon, 4 electrons swirl around as an outer cloud and 2 as an inner cloud.
(The electron cloud around C has two layers).
Elements bond by sharing some electrons.

Hydrogen (H) has 1 electron. It can share it with one C, and another H atom can share its electron with the same C. Now we have CH2, or Methylene.
The C atom can still take more electrons from another H.
Adding can give CH4, or Methane. It’s the natural gas you cook with, also called LNG.
The maximum of bonds between two elements is defined by rules, but that’s for chemistry college.

From carbon it is said, it’s the ‘tramp’ or ‘hooker’ in chemistry.
Carbon can take almost every chemical element easy to bond (mix) with, and super strong.

Consequently C is in almost everything. The strong bonding also means that it’s hard to break it apart.

More examples of bonds:

1 Part H and 2 parts of O make water (H2O).
1 Part C and 1 part O make CO.
1 Part C and 2 parts O make CO2.

CO is not CO2 !!

herpes-confusionPeople easy mix them up.
Media and films don’t help much either.

CO (carbon monoxide) doesn’t occur naturally in the atmosphere.
It’s an odourless and almost invisible gas as a result of oxygen-starving inefficient combustion.
Old technology in the 60s, 70s and 80s produced it in large; the grey-blackened smoke. Think about the old cars, old furnaces, but also house fires and candles.
It swarms wide spread in open air so is almost invisible

CO2 (carbon dioxide) comes from efficient optimised ventilated combustion; still odourless but totally invisible gas. It also occurs naturally in the atmosphere in super abundance.

CO2 is needed for life on earth as we know it; totally impossible to live without that abundance.
So where CO is unhealthy and a pollutant, CO2 is life and very healthy.

All plant life on earth and in the ocean inhale CO2, takes the C and breaths out the 1 remaining part O.
All mammals, reptiles, birds and fish on earth (including us humans) inhale O for combustion of what they ate; so what’s in their cells. Then exhale CO2 for all green life, including for all plants and plankton in the massive ocean volume.
Oceans also create water vapour (H2O) by the sun’s heat, which form the clouds; clouds produce rain (accumulated H2O), and so on. Volcanoes and plate tectonics also release a lot of CO2.
It’s a total complete eco system of life.

Mind you that the total area of ocean + air from top to bottom, is zillions m3 more compared to the area in where we humans live. We cannot even imagine how massively relatively very super little our habitat is. It’s a drop in a billion litre tank.

Crunching numbers not done before

National Geophysical Data Center estimates (rounded numbers):

Ocean water:                        Air / Atmosphere:
~200,000,000 km3               ~500,000,000 km3

Total volume of ocean water + air:
200,000,000 + 500,000,000 = 700,000,000 km3.

1 km3 = 1,000 km2

So, flattened calculated, the total ocean water + air:
700,000,000,000 km2.

Earth’s land mass:
~148,000,000 km2 is total land mass, flattened calculated.
~37,000,000 km2 land mass is habituated by humans.

37,000,000 km2 / 700,000,000,000 km2 = 0.0053%

So in that tiny fraction of 0,0053% is where we live !!
And we do not even use all of that super miniature space.

More about CO & CO2

questionCO2 is healthy and goes up in the atmosphere. CO is unhealthy, stays low and swarms locally.

So keeping the local air clean from CO (carbon monoxide, which isn’t CO2) makes sense.

Too much CO suffocates, is bad for the longues and blocks sun light. This was the smog we had in Europe after WWII, and China still has in cities. (CO could be written as CO1, or C1O1, but 1s are always unwritten in chemistry. )

As CO was the result of old fashion oxygen-starving combustion, catalysers were fitted.
So if emissions by all vehicles and industry are the result of efficient and optimised ventilated combustion with a catalyser, they emit CO2 instead of CO. It’s where we are since the 90s.
And that’s fine.
Old vehicles emitted too much CO (the grey-blackened smoke), and that’s not good. Still the case in China and India on large scale, but that’s gone here, although smog in cities do still occur.

So CO2 is super vital to life (never a pollutant or unhealthy !!).
It’s absolutely essential and in massive abundance needed as a building block of earth and life.
CO2 is super good !!

Carbon is all well? No down sides?
The down side is that chemical bonds with C are super strong, therefore hard to break up.
However, all plants on land and in the ocean (including plankton) need CO2 to live and grow, so they inhale it, break it up to exhale O.
So breaking it up can’t be that hard. But it does take some form of energy, for example electricity, but there are other ways such as synthetic photosynthesis (basically replicating plant leaves).
Using intense concentrated sunlight is another rather easy way.

Black coal is very misunderstood as well.
Coal is majorly made out of Carbon which has bonded with lesser parts of hydrogen (H), Sulfur (S), Oxygen (O) and Nitrogen (N). Coal is a pure organic fuel which contains all elements of life.
Why is that? Because coal is basically decayed (rotten) plants and trees put under pressure for millions of years in the earth. Less decayed is brown coal and even less rotten is turf.

Coal and wood powered steam engines from the 1800s up to the early 1950s. And people heated their buildings with wood, turf and brown coal. All those are oxygen-starving processes.
Today electricity is often still produced by coal. The smoke you see from the towers is however water vapour, perfectly harmless. Water is used too cool down in those modern cooling towers today; so that’s the water vapour you see (H2O).

Coal does however stay in the closed burning energy production furnace in the industry to be exhausted into catalysers; emitting CO2 in the open air, not CO.
Again, the white smoke we see is the water vapour from the cooling towers.
We don’t heat our houses with open furnaces anymore since the 70s, and we don’t burn coal or wood anymore to power trains since the 50s. And cars and industry are fitted with catalysers.

The huge countries India en China, responsible for ~33% of earth’s population, do not heat their houses and buildings at all, or hardly (own experience). China in the North can be cold. People simply dress for it, they do not heat their houses at all. Only some good restaurants and star hotels provide heating.
In Africa they often cook with wood and use old cars which emit CO, but not in large enough that it pollutes, nor does it concentrate in the air.
China however produces a lot of CO in the open air by industry, and by old and simple super cheap vehicles we had 50 years ago. The majority uses those because that´s what they can afford for now.

As we have learned, C can bond easy, so CO can be transformed to CO2 but some energy would be needed. Sun light will transform the CO to CO2, however it takes more time than producing CO in large scale. Africa doesn’t produce CO in large so the sun light can do the work.

But China does and the sun plus the air with oxygen can’t keep up, so accumulating low in the atmosphere, it pollutes locally. It blocks the sun locally, gives a light suffocated feeling, dizziness and is terrible for the lounges. That’s horrific for health indeed.

But again, CO is not CO2.
CO is unhealthy, stays low and swarms locally.
CO2 is an absolute vital life component and rises up in the atmosphere.

All political focus here today seems to be on CO2 since the problem of CO is resolved, which is very odd. It shall be demonstrated in a later graph.

Our Atmosphere

CO2 is not the main component of the atmosphere. It varies between 0.3 and 1.0% (there are different claims). This chart shows 0.38% CO2 of all gases in the atmosphere; Aspen Global Change Institute.


The green house gases regulate earth’s temperature, and these are:

CO2                          0.38%
Methane (CH4)           0.0001% (is the same as the gas from your gas stove, called LNG).
Nitrous Oxide             0.00013%
Hydrogen                   0.00001%
Water vapour (H2O)    2.00% – 3.00% (can never be higher than 4.00%).

Ozone isn’t even mentioned; averages ~0.000004%

Remember that Ozone was a big political issue and for Greenpeace ? Laugh !

High water vapour feels uncomfortable and sweaty but water has the second highest specific heat capacity of all known substances. That means it requires high amounts of heat energy to raise its temperature.
Water also has a high energy/heat requirement for evaporation, and evaporation is directly related to cooling of the ambient temperature.

So whatever politicians now try to make believe… they should go back to school on this matter…

CO2 (and also CH4) are interesting to look at, because as said, C bonds so super strong that it takes years to decay where other gases decompose faster and some even within a few days, some even near immediate. CO2 takes hundreds of years to decompose by itself. However CH4 decays within decades.

As you see, CO isn’t in it. It forms local problems for other reasons such as health which is of high priority concern, but not related to so called men made global warming.
We’ve done away with CO and smog in Western Europe, and in Eastern Europe since the Berlin wall has fallen.


During the 60s, 70s and 80s our western environment had indeed become highly polluted as in the former east bloc. Mainly CO and consumed litter everywhere. But that’s long gone. Plastics are being recycled, etc. Although plastics in ocean seems to be an issue, but that has attention.

Land here is very much cleaned up and we should be happy.

But in the mean time entire big environment business and political careers have been build up… All wanting to keep that to utilise it, as well as students find subsidies or work in that field. Checking internet, shows the total madness around CO2 alone, all profiting from it.

As we say in business… all is green, as long as we can make big bucks from it.

It all has much more to do with making big money, careers, scoring politically and taxing the public. Political green parties have established from early environmentalists and career hunters today, using environment as their unique selling point. But that all has nothing to do with science and reality of today at all.

Mind you, the next political thing just might be Methane (CH4), in other words your natural gas…

Shell and British Gas have just merged forming one of the biggest energy corporations in the world. They deliver many politicians, have politicians and bankers in their board of directors and in non executive boards, are number one in massive pollution scandalous (Africa, Ukraine, Americas, etc) and they drive direct causes of wars, crises and blockades… WWI, WWII, all of the Middle East since WWI, the Caucasus, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Africa…

Methane isn’t exactly going to be reduced whatsoever. In fact it is expanding since wars are going on about it; north Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Donetsk.

What adds up and what doesn’t

156564_mozg-ludzki-use-itDo you really believe, we living in 0.0053% (which we do not use all) can make even the smallest ripple in all air and ocean water of
700,000,000,000 km2 ??

CO2 only forms 0.38% in the total atmosphere on top of that !!

Not only that, there is much more they don’t tell us about CO2, which we shall explain further.


The IPCC is installed by the UN. It doesn’t research or measure anything. It collects data only and reports. Members of the IPCC are chosen by politics. Internal disputes made scientists leave. They saw it was a political and money driven monster and debates were not tolerated. The IPCC is mainly to service the politics which gives subsidies, so it provides some scientists with big careers and to support politics for their case. But that’s not science.

The IPCC keeps all leaving authors on their list. On the leavers own request, the IPCC did not remove them with the argument that they had contributed. The leavers argued they didn’t since they did not agree and court had to come in between. That shows how politically loaded the IPCC is.

So, if it is claimed that many scientists agree, it only means they are on the list of IPCC’s authors.
That doesn’t mean they concur whatsoever. The IPCC is just a harsh stingy beast.

Basically, I’m very familiar with these kind of government scientific institutes as well. Account managers have clear annual targets. That is, get as much subsidies as possible. All outcome of the projects for application are already determined, they are to serve pre-projected goals of commerce and politics.
That has nothing to do with science.

The IPCC isn’t different.

CO2 levels and earth’s Temperature

Ok, so I took a look at earlier and the latest IPCC reports, from NASA, MIT and Berkley university.

Interesting is that CO2 has gone up from 187 ppm over billions of years to ~270 by ~1800 when the industrial revolution began. Then it shoots up. In 2000 CO2 was 400 ppm.


Reports of 2014 shows a climb to 450.

Interesting, but we can also show the growth of donkeys worldwide…
an increase of ~20% since 1966…
Or growth of human population shows exactly the same hockey stick like CO2…

I can also make a graph showing the increase of cows since 1800… Shows exactly the same curve. Laying that over the CO2 curve, there you are, a clear correlation… cows caused more CO2…

The IPCC just picks their stuff for show…

More interesting, from 400 to 450 CO2 isn’t an actual increase of 0.12.
400 stands for… 400 parts per million (ppm)….

So the actual increase is 50 parts per 1,000,000… or 0.00005 (!)

Sure, when I present an increase from 187 to 270 and then suddenly to 450 on a graph, it shows bad… Good for a horror show…

But the actual increase is 0,00002 to 0.00003 and then to 0.00005… Alarming?

I guess, the increasing use of paperclips shows the same graph, or the number of cups of tea we all drink more since 1800… I mean…really…

Oh, then it is over population then…
Is it…

The IPCC shows that the average earth temperature has gone up very steady by 0.51 oC since 1880, not following the CO2 trend at all. NASA, MIT and Berkley show the same graph.
The graph shows it clear: a very steady average increase of 0.51 oC from 1800 to now, 2015.

616910main_gisstemp_2011_graph_lrgThat curve shows no sudden uptrends.

Over 400,000 years to present, the average temperature shows very regular pattern up and down, almost like a heart beat. All ups and downs are within the same bands and no signs of going out of trend at all.

vostokBut wait…how do scientists measure historic temperatures…

In 2003 they took arctic ice and measured the contents of CO2 all down to pre-historic layers.
So they assumed that temperature and CO2 are correlated in the first place.
If you take that as assumed correlation… it automatically calculates a temperature directly related to it, exactly as you wanted.
Who says that this direct relation is correct… It’s an assumption, not proven yet.

The prove does not exist, because the IPCC, NASA, MIT and Berkley university all confirm that earth’s temperature has been stable since 1997. Yet CO2 has gone up from 400 to 450…

We hardly can find graphs about earth’s average temperature all up to 2014 on the internet. Most stop at 2000… very handy to convince people otherwise, but that’s manipulating.
This graph shows 1997 to 2014.

Climate depotMIT and Berkeley also came to the conclusion that, although over a million parameters are measured and collected into data sets, there is no computing power available yet to do all the computations. These kind of powerful computers simply don’t exist yet.

Data is selected by the IPCC, entered and processed with loads of assumptions made in the software models, and then presented in the worst looking way.
It was also concluded that there are more unknowns than knowns

And having seen IPCC’s graphs presented, I must agree… manipulated.

Statistics can be presented in many ways. What I notice is the IPCC blows up Y axes to exaggerate curves and use tiny fractions of integers. And different time scales are presented with inconsistent conclusions in such a way that the case seems confirmed.
Also incomplete correlations are being presented, as well as important info is left out.

And interesting is that the number of measurements devices increased and changed over time. Also locations were added and changed.
Change and increase of devices, methods and locations create a pile of errors and unknown variations, known as ‘error margin’. For example, measuring temperature by UV light or by using mercury can easily give a variation of +/- 1 oC, no matter how fine they are calibrated or adjusted. And measuring more urban makes a big difference too. The devices used… really many are high tech, but also many are not at all.

Anyway, an error margin of at least +/1 oC is to be taken into account most likely.

Since the IPCC does only collect a million of data types, totally does no measuring themselves, is politicised bureaucratic on a political agenda, depending on that subsidy, using loads of assumptions, models and manipulate statistics, I really can’t see how they it ever able to have an actual clue whatsoever. Let alone understanding the more unknowns than knowns or even be credible.

Silence info about CO2

DangerVery interesting is what professors of MIT and Berkley say about CO2 as they wanted to explore effects of CO2.

Contained and raising CO2 levels made plants grow quicker in their botanical environment !!
Temperatures didn’t rise.
Quicker growing plants means they inhale CO2 faster and produce O more rapid.

Mythbusters experimented as well. They showed that temperature goes up by 1oC if CO2 was multiplied by 12,000 in a small space, the size of a home fish tank.
No plant life was in the tank.

Mythbusters concluded… “There is a relation between CO2 and temperature. Confirmed”.
I call that media propaganda because there was no plant life and CO2 was accumulated totally unrealistic overly exaggerated by 12,000x. And plants breath CO2, exhaling O.

Earth’s real rise of CO2 is 0.00005, remember ?

MIT and Berkley continues about CO2.
If there is the slightest increase of temperature, nature will correct it in many ways.
One way is that water will vaporise just a fraction of already a tiny bit more, cooling the environment down. During the small ice age in the middle ages for instance, Europe had grown vast forests in advance due to the warmer era earlier. This was the result of more CO2 available.
Deforestation began naturally as people needed the wood for many purposes.

And there are many ways nature balances. Our super tiny habitat and impact in the total zillion more area of air and water is none other than being part of a cycle. Over population isn’t even a factor in our super tiny space. And even that nature does correct. From 2050 onwards, earth’s population will decrease. But then again, population and its emissions don’t have the tiniest effect on earth’s temperature via a zillion more air + water.

A scam?

i-want-my-money-backPerhaps something has gone out of control as a huge industry derived from it.

Co-founder Patrick Moore of Greenpeace left for that reason. He said in many interviews that he saw it getting highly politicised. A small example. Greenpeace wanted to forbid Chloride totally to 0.0. Moore said… “Hold on, that’s on the periodic table and it’s a natural earth element, nature needs it, we cannot forbid it.” And so he had many fights and left.

By now, a lot of ex Greenpeace members are in the highest ranks of global politics and institutions.

Do you really believe, we living on 0.0053% can make a ripple in all air and ocean water which is a total of 700,000,000,000 km2 ??
And CO2 forms 0.38% in the total atmosphere on top of that !!

And moreover, the correlation between CO2 and temperature rise isn’t proven at all. In the contrary, it is proven that CO2 actually corrects indirectly by growing plants and trees quicker.
Worse of all, all presentations about men made global warming are full of manipulations, hammered on us daily.

Having crunched most crucial matters not done before and having unwrapped the hocus pocus, we can safely come to the conclusion that global warming is far from plausible and far from logic and analyses. It isn’t happening since the middle ages, not since 1800, not since WWII and certainly not in the last 18 years… !!

I’m not saying we shouldn’t care about our planet. I believe we should live very considerate, but I do want to separate propaganda from reality basic stuff.

But I do think it is about time to ask a pile of taxes back !
All the CO2 based taxes… really…


RubleSymbolIn April 2012 I started this blog. I am deeply motivated to expose the crooked dysfunctional financial system we all live in today. It’s causing wars and crises. 2007/8 Was no exception. And it’s causing high tension now between Russia and the US/EU.

I encourage reading earlier posts and also to forget about ‘Zeitgeist’ or ‘Thrives’ for a moment.

Both have done a great job, but they explains high finance before 2000 which is already deeply rotten. But it has exponentially accelerated since 2000 and crashed in 2007/8 because of a critical new ingredients: the fast rise of the Swaps, and specially the fast rise of the Credit Default Swap (CDR).

The CDR is recognised to be the prime cause of the last crash which was almost fatal.

The financial rotten system since 2000 in its core is really very simple to understand.
Explained here: The Daily Lie.
And very elaborate, including names of those responsible, here: Modern Plofkip Bankieren (Dutch).

Growth = Must = Manipulation to growth = Must
If Growth = not = Economic collapse

We are now in 2015…. Something changed? Nope. Tension between the US/EU and Russia is next.
People should rise up based on present knowledge, not on what was…

If we don’t understand how the elite cooks their banquet today, and as long as we are behind reading past methods, then they will keep hijacking us and we must eat their tasty but vicious dinner.

Then the elite will deal with us rather than we deal with the elite.

1. Russia

In this post I will explain the Russian financial structure, as it’s pegged to the US dollar and IMF as well.
The BRICs countries are tired of it and motivated to unwrap their dependence on it.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

Putin can do this now, since Russia is totally debt free again since 2006 (!)

Putin was very clear during the Valdai World Order Discussion Club, 2014.
Officially recorded and published on Youtube

He stated seeing a bi-polar world. In other words, two world trade and reserve currencies systems existing in parallel, rather than a global pegging to the US dollar and IMF power only.
Also China favours it, as do Brasil, India and South Africa. And more countries will be joining BRICs.

Historic awareness is crucial. We should learn from it, however;

after reading this section 1 and 2, you can scroll straight to 8, but I would read section 4 too;
it explains the direct financing of Rotschild-Schiff of the Russian Revolution in 1917 which was to establish the USSR for decades to come.

In essence:

Before 1917 (Tsar ruling) and during Soviet ruling, no commercial bank ever was allowed to become bigger than the state (the opposite in Europe already in 1885). And no commercial bank was ever allowed to create money. Peter the Great standardised the silver Ruble. It was the only lawful mean of exchange in Russia. Although gold and platinum denominations were also accepted.

This had worked well during the 500 century era of the Tsar and vast decades of the USSR.
It contaminated in the 70s and 80s. The disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 illustrated the last straw.

I’m not saying that Russia was exactly heaven. Eurasia was in constant war and people suffered.
And jewish oil barons in the Caucasus and steel magnates later used workers almost as slaves.
Social and economic conditions in Eurasia were dreadful.

Russia was portrayed being far behind on the west. But Russians, mainly farmers, lived very simple. At least the Russian finance system itself was healthy. It was stable and could not be dominated by the jewish system of Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff.

During the 70s and 80s Russia (then USSR) started to depend on the US dollar…

2. The Caucasus and Middle East (don’t skip this)

450px-Caucasus_regions_mapThe Caucuses borders to Iran and Turkey, laying between the Black and Caspian Sea.

The Ukraine with the Crimea lays closely strategically nearby, North at the Black Sea.

Oil, natural gas and all other resources in the Middle East AND The Caucasus provide the majority of the lot we all depend on.

This was already since decades before WWII and it’s why Hitler launched operation Barbarossa.

He depended half on Rockefeller’s Standard Oil via the Union Bank corp. of NY where Prescott Bush had a leading position in the board (grandfather of G.W. and Jeb Bush). The other half came from synthetic petrol made by IG Farben.

Ford Germany made the majority of trucks for WWII and they could run on both. Of course Ford and Rockefeller were business partners. Car barons need oil barons. And Ford was anti-Semitic, so supporting Hitler as well.

Thyssen (steel baron and canon producer) saw trouble coming before WWII and opened business in NY to secure his big German industry. He established the Union Bank corp. of NY with Bush and made sure his Nazi war machines could be capitalised via this way. Also the Nazi party banked there.
But Hitler wanted a self-supportive 3rd Reich and had shortage of oil, so started Barbarossa. The battle of Stalingrad was the final turning point for that operation… It was all about Caucasian oil… as it is today.

Later in this post I will show that Stalin was a strong union leader of oil refinery in the Caucasus before he came to power during WWI in where the Russian revolution took place. Orchestrated and financed in gold billions by the Rotshchild partners, Stalin had direct contact with. It resulted in the USSR for decades to come.

You may say… come on now, this is 2015.
Well, is it?
Our western world today is deeply shaped and carved as a result of WWI, II and Vietnam.
First Iraq and now the so called Arabian spring and Ukraine are the latest game changers.

All structures and borders today are a direct result of past treaties and guidelines from those wars.
All recent big world institutions came as a result, and newer ones were constructed to overrun Asia, such as the Asian Development Bank (ADB) which is run by the same executive top officials from the UN, ECB, FED, WTO, World bank, IMF, and the private societies such as Council on Foreign Relations
(is non-governmental), Trilateral Commission (same), etc.

The ADB finances the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. That line is the actual prime cause of the US and Europe to step in. That lines is to be the 1st independent connecting line to Europe, to be finished in 2017. All the rest was a show for the oblivious. The entire story: Economy War and Realism.

More than half of the world’s resources of oil and gas are concentrated in and around the same region: Caucasus, Middle East… Also shale gas is present… Donetsk (East Ukraine).

Now, do we get the total picture ?

Corruption-Essay-In-EnglishRuthless intensely politicised private business wants to grab it all. Perhaps nations want self-sustainability, but they depend on their politicised industry and banking barons. Their networks and protégés occupy high positions.

And moreover, they totally depend on private deep politicised financiers since they still have the exclusive right to issue money out of new government debt (bonds) in both the EU and US. In the US since the FED and in the EU since the treaty of Lisbon, 2007.

See, where Rutte came from, Unilever (old Rockefeller bastion), Wouter Bos and Bolkenstein…. both from Royal Dutch Shell…
Many politicians and state officials also come from ING, Hommen, Rinnooy Kan (member of the Trilateral Commission (TLC), or Citybank, Onno Runding (also TLC).
Weijffels: Rabobank, SER, World bank, now retired but wrote an ultra-thin booklet how to reform the financial system which is a laugh. He had a leading position in the World bank. When a plane crashes we get elaborate big reports… This guy knows much better, but won’t change anything.

Look at where Joe Biden’s and John Kerry’s sons are positioned in executive positions in Burisma (shale gas exploiting, found in Donetsk a few years ago) and in investment corporations to finance it.
Or see where vice president Dick Cheney under Bush went to… CEO of oil field service company Halliburton (pipes, tooling, construction) active in the Middle East. Quite handy after false flag Iraq blown to pieces by his government.
Look where almost all US presidential staff and secretaries still come from, Goldman Sachs and other Wall street banks. The NY FED under the US FED is privately owned.
It’s the same everywhere. Draghi, president of the ECB came from Goldman Sachs. He’s also leading in the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Deutsche Bank co-owns the FED (last research). All the FED’s presidents were/are directly from Wallstreet as well.

Royal Dutch Shell recruits most non-executives from Deutsche Bank (DB).
DB financed WWII and now with Goldman Sachs ruined Greece financially by the crashing Swaps.
Ministers of Finance, many came/come from banking and returned later, or were put there afterwards.
Christine Lagarde of the IMF… same thing.
Older families like Rockefeller have senators and states men in place, or the Bush family…

Jeb Bush was Chairman for setting up the Project of the New American Century (PNAC) with Netanyahu, and early American Neoconservatives such as Cheney, Powell, Rice and so on, in collaboration with the Neoliberals. We got false flag Iraq from that bunch and it explains almost no difference between the two American parties Democrats and Republicans. Jeb is now governor of Florida. Cheney CEO of Halliburton…

Jeb Bush’ PNAC spans decades and is to overrun the world and secure Israel. Iraq was the first step. These totally inner-obsessed small minds believe that the world should be modeled after the US. They arrogantly believe it would be the best for mankind… While the US itself is a massive patsy of selfish greed and total corruption.

After TTIP the US and EU will be one dominant force to accomplish it… that is for sure.
And NATO and the US army will be its armed force !!

They will bring the rest of the world in ruins… again !!
Jeb Bush might run for presidential election in 2016 !!

And the list goes on and on…

World business, politics, banks, media are all the same bunch. Feel free to read earlier posts where all is fundamentally connected and exposed with names.

Is this 2015? No it isn’t. It is still ape land.

3. Pre WWI (pre Russian Revolution)

NicolasIISkip it if you want since it has no relation to the dollar today.
But… it tells why Russia already back then had a strong separate standing. Tsars kept state finance away from commercial banking (Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff marriage), steel and oil barons (left: the last Tsar, Nicolas II).

Europe and also Russia were ruled by royal aristocracy. Intermarriages, high finance and wars kept them going.
The house of Romanov ruled in Russia. Anna Palowna, the Tsar’s sister (both Romanov), married the 2nd Dutch king William II for example.

They all had the same banker, the Rotschild family.
They all depended on it.

The reason is that Dutch William III (1650 – 1702) reigned over England, Ireland, Netherlands and all their colonies such as the (first) early 13 North American Colonies.

Basically, William III reigned over a quarter of the world.

Of course gold and silver were looted from those countries, but long and many expensive wars were common in Eurasia. Britain ran into bankruptcy at one point, although William III had access to most of the gold in the world, but the royal houses lived exorbitant wealthy and wars were expensive.

Rotschild lended William as much as he wanted for 8%. In return Rothschild demanded exclusive right to issue money, instead of the state. It was done.
The Bank of England was erected. Its system was modelled after the 1st private central bank in Amsterdam which was mainly for VOC purposes.
Since then we live by ‘Rothschild banking’ here in the west.

Soon after, entire European royal families became heavily in debt because of their wars and Rothschild soon became bigger than each European nation.

Russia was very different.
The Romanovs and Rothschilds hated each other. Rothschild was massively active in Europe and Russia financing both their oil barons in which royal houses had shares.
But Tsar Nicholas made sure the Rotschilds and similar families would never become more powerful than the state. He kept them smaller. In fact, the Romanovs were the richest in the world.

Russia had the silver Ruble for about 500 years. Peter the Great standardized it to 28 grams of silver.
Higher denominations minted of gold and platinum were available as well.
Russia issued its money, not Rotschild nor intermarried partners Warburg and Schiff.

Meanwhile the western industrialisation based on capitalism had begun. Oil became crucial. The aristocratic elite and new money (industry) in Europe didn’t care all too much about the common people. They just wanted to live their own good life.

The Russian Family of Tsar Nicholas II was different again. They were pious Orthodox Christians. They exemplified all that is precious in a family, namely, Christian piety and love for one’s neighbour.
But again, nonetheless, life in Russia, like in Europe, was terrible and the Tsars ruled autocratic.

Although Rothschild’s related investors financed the build of railroad and access to Russian oil, Russia fell behind on the western industry but that’s was Russia’s way. From a Orthodox Christian morality they believed in simplicity, goodness and love for one’s neighbour. The land provides… a farmer state, like islam in the Ottoman Empire, or the christian puritans in the US.

But during the upcoming industrial revolution ever more people went from their farms to work in privately owned factories where conditions were awful.

Oil from Russian Caucasus was mainly transported to the West for their big industrial barons such as APOC (now BP), Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Royal Dutch Shell (Bataafse Petroleum Maatschappij with the royal house as main share holder), etc.
Deutsche Bank was and still is Shells’ banker. This bank was run by the Rotschild’s Warburg family branch, into WWII and financed the vast majority of industry, war (also WWII) and royal families.
Russia didn’t need much oil, but the western and Russian oil barons pumped, refined and traded it.
The Tsar let them be to a certain point as all royal houses had shares and profit from it.

Workers were almost treated like slaves.

Deutsche Bank is still co-owner of the FED today (most recent research) after it was setup by initiative of Paul Warburg (Jekyll Island meeting to write draft legislation with directly lobby).
The FED was erected in 1913 approved by Congress during the last Christmas recess.
It is a direct lobbied private entity, and still is. Again, Deutsche Bank is still co-owner.

In 1815 something went wrong for the Rothschilds in the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. This congress was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government, to give them complete control over much of the civilized world.

Many of the European governments were deeply in debt to the Rothschilds, so they used that as a bargaining tool. However Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, was against the plan, so the Rothschild world government plan failed.

This left the Rothschilds in total anger. They retaliated 100 years later, agreed by British King George V who envied his cousin Nicolas II.

4. Russian revolution 1917 during WWI

rothschild-hid-hand-orgAnother section you can skip if you want, but…

It does explain how it was financed by Rothschild-Schiff, the Tsar family assassinated as retaliation, all State and Romanovs gold then looted and brought to Paris and London. The Rotschilds leaving the country were very well compensated on top of all, and the USSR under Stalin came out of it. All exactly as they had carefully planned and wanted.

In 1905 Jackob Schiff (a Rothschild intermarried partner as Warburg) financed the war of Japan against Russia. He earned a Medal of the Japanese Emperor ! Schiff’s puppet Teddy Roosevelt won a Nobel Peace Prize !

In the same year (1905), Rothschild’s Reds used the opportunity to attempt a Russian revolution, after an all out country wide worker’s strike in 1904. Even peaceful worker’s demonstrations had led to killings by the guard of the Tsar’s winter palace where workers donated their demands. So Rothschild took the opportunity soon but the attempted coup failed.

WWI was a European expansion by banking war once again. It started with Italy wanting to be a super power and needed financing. Germany was the example. Scattered Italy reunited as Germany did. Italy’s eyes were initially on the the less equipped Ottoman army in Ottoman Libya as an easy prey. That less successful, Italy ignited the Balkan war to form a second front. The assassination of Austrian Archduke Ferdinand by a Serb resulted in WWI as the newspaper hype (who owned them?) blaming Serbia.
Italian Libya was one of the results after WWI.
When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia declared was on Austria-Hungary. Within a few weeks, Germany, Ottoman Turkey and Austria-Hungary were at war with Russia, France and Britain.

Rothschild had the lower hand in funding Russia for WWI, which was the opposite in Europe.
So during WWI Rothschild took advantage to get the upper hand in Russia. It was this Jew, Jacob Schiff, who brought Leon Trotsky (born “Lev Bronstein”) to New York in February 1916.

Trotsky and Lenin both had fled or emigrated to Western Europe since they were senior active figures of the revolutionary Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks and Mensheviks).
They became Marxists and it was in Europe where they could hold constructive meetings without being arrested again.
In New York, Trotsky recruited Russian jews from New York’s Russian jewish immigrant population in the Lower East Side of Manhattan and trained them as revolutionaries.

On March 27 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained jewish communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side, boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiafjord” for a journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in Russia.
(Early March – late February Julian Calendar then used in Russia – an orchestrated revolt in St. Petersburg had already begun know as the February Revolution. It had started on Women’s Day.)

Trotsky’s purpose was to secure and establish a Marxist government under the leadership of Lenin, himself and Stalin. Before departing, Jacob Schiff gave this group 20 million USD in gold.
This came from their special firm setup earlier in NY, called ‘American International corp.’

With support from inside the Social Democratic party and many of the jewish-run soviets, Lenin, joined by Trotsky from New York, gained the upper hand over the Kerensky government.

In August of 1917, the Russian Royal Family fled to Tobolsk in Siberia, after the Tsar abdicated. They stayed at the Governors House until April 1918. They hoped to escape to England where King George V, a Romanov cousin, would hopefully grant them refuge. But he refused due to pressure from jewish lobbies.

After abdication, the still sitting Tsar-era-administration formed a provisional government, but the Red October revolution of 1917 secured Lenin as 1st Chairman of the 1st all-Soviet government.

On April 22 1918, the jew, Jacob Sverdlov, 1st President of the Soviet Union, sent his aide, the jew, Yankel Yakovlev, to Tobolsk to persuade Tsar Nicholas II to agree to sanction the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty. Tsar Nicholas refused for he considered the treaty an ‘eternal disgrace to Russia.’ He did though agree to return to Moscow as he was told that the Germans were willing to grant him asylum.

They got as far as Ekaterinburg in the Urals where the train was halted by the Regional Soviets dominated by four jews, Goloshchekin, Safarov, Voikov and Syromolotov. These four communists appointed the jew, Jacob Yurovsky, son of a local jewish ex-convict, as the head the local Cheka (Soviet Secret Police) in Ekaterinburg. Yurovsky was given the assignment to imprison, plan, and carry out, the assassination of the Russian Royal Family.

Yurovsky brought the Russian Royal Family to a former house of a wealthy jewish merchant named Ipatiev, now made into a prison for the Tsar and his family. It should be noted that Ekaterinburg, named after named after St Catherine the Great, was renamed “Sverdlovsk” in 1924 in honor of Jacob Sverdlov who gave the final order to execute the Russian Royal Family.

On July 4 1918, Yurovsky dismissed all the Russian soldiers who were guarding the Tsar except for a Pavel Medvedev, a Cheka jewish spy. Yurovsky replaced the loyal-to-the-Tsar Russian soldiers with jewish communist assassins from Hungary. That they were Jewish communists from Hungary, their scribbling on the walls indicated.

Karl Marx at the time was also funded by Rothschild. From his education in France and England, Marx developed his personal Communistic ideals and wrote the Communist Manifesto, although we can estimate quite rightly that these ideas, in reality based on dictatorial rule that no one wanted, were refined for public distribution.

The following letter by Baruch Levy, to Marx, reflects Weishaupt’s dictatorial socialism in a Zionistic format:

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this “new world order” the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands” (from `La Revue de Paris’, p. 574, June 1, 1928.

Meanwhile the Rothschild banking family settled the first Russian jews in what was to become Israel, starting in 1880, 17 years prior to the 1st zionist convention in 1897. The Rothschilds took leading positions in the zionist movement, financed the settlements and bought a gigantic piece of land for investments. The Rothschild statue still stand in Tel Aviv and a road is named after the family.
British Lord Rothschild (leader of the British zionist movement) forwarded the Balfour Declaration to the British government which was returned to him signed. It stated that a homeland for the jews in Palestine was to be secured. A part that belonged to the Ottoman Empire. And it all happened.

After the Russian Revolution and establishment of the USSR, each Kibbutz became militarised by Russian weapons to drive the Palestinians out with militia and guerrilla tactics to expand the territory by rapid emerging new settlements, connecting them with roads like a spider web Palestinians were not allowed to use. A tactic still used today.

To no surprise the Palestine people who lived there for centuries revolted. After Israel became a reality in 1948/9, the PLO was formed as a greater revolt with Arafat as leader. The PLO was of course flagged as terrorists.

After the Russian revolution and the entire Romanov’s assassinated, all Russian state and Romanovs gold was brought to Paris and London.
The gold was split. A part for King George V and the other part for Rotschild. With this gold, they bought their direct way further into the FED which had recently come into place via partner and family Paul Warburg via the Jeckyll Island meeting.

Again in the new USSR, the state controlled creation its own money entirely, stopping spiraling inflation.

5. Stalin

stalinWhere did Stalin come from (skip this part too if you want).

Stalin was an unlawful born child as a result of quick one stance adultery sex between Ketevan ‘Keke’ Jughashvili neé Geladze (beautiful 20-year-old woman worked as a laundress for a jewish wine merchant in the Georgian city of Gori) and Maurice Ephrussi who was the 2nd biggest oil magnate in Russia and an agent for Rotschild.

All oil workers lived in the city of Baku (Caucasus oil fields).

Maurice took care of Keke and the child in secret. Stalin was given a job in one of Rotschild’s refineries where he was made a strong leader of the union.

In 1901 already, Baku delivered half the world’s oil. Stalin had great knowledge of the oil industry and his connections to the top of oil and politics were direct. The perfect puppet.

But in 1912, Eduard the Rothschild, Alphonse’s son, sold most of the Rotschild oil interests to Royal Dutch Shell. The Rothschild took most payments in the form of Shell shares.

So after the Soviets came to power the Rothschilds cashed out and left Russia. Their ex-palace is now the Azerbaijan Justice Ministry.

6. The obsessive self-indulged

Jews are to blame for all the world’s misery? That’s not what I am saying.

It’s just that vicious, cruel, ruthless and careless families like Rothschild, Morgan, Warbug, Schiff intermarried and became financially bigger than nations, except for Russia (and the Ottoman empire).

As the jewish population lived in exile, most of them homed in Germany and Russia (and Spain). Any public profession for them was forbidden, so most of them went into currency exchange and business from small to huge industrial scale. The different jewish populations throughout Europe had loose ties. But as they intermarry mostly, the whole is kept segregated.
Their commerce, lobbies and high financial domination over vast parts of Europe, Russia, and later the US, made that they had the upper hand almost everywhere, but behind the scenes.

However, there is a noticeable split into two main groups. The orthodox and secular liberals.
The last group can be majorly found in zionism. Zionists and other secular liberals have nothing with religion (judaism) whatsoever and therefore isn’t anti-Semitic. Orthodox jews oppose zionism.

In general, however, the jewish thought that either socialism or liberalism would bring them to ‘salvation’.
In other words… it doesn’t matter how. This is severely exploited by the obsessive self-indulged and explains community of Kibbutzes, the funding of the Russian Revolution as well, and support of liberal conservative directions and also those via political active faiths. But since a few years the Orthodox have come into mass demonstration against their zionist leaders which is held out of the news.

Zionism is a political segregated movement based on economic and cultural nationalism, no assimilation of others, super capitalism and without compassion of the rest. They denominate themselves as the ‘chosen people’ and think that others have less rights. They are to serve them.
All parties in Israel today carry the name ‘Zion’ in them with a few exceptions.

In the christian world almost the same happened after the reformation, especially in the UK and US. Specially the US is strongly based on protestantism from the beginning. Kennedy was the only catholic president.
In Europe, religion wasn’t a free choice. And so many went to the new continent. The Pilgrims story is famous (the reason why Americans celebrate Thanksgiving) and their bible remains at the heart of the US founding and government, specially even today.

As the US is also the land of opportunity where one could make it as a poor immigrant with modest government controls, it had set the door wide open to corruption of secular protestant and jewish secular families who are extremely obsessed greedy and addicted to power and control while being highly conservative, occupying most of high finance, top politics and top business in the US.
And is in essence, this is still the US and EU ‘landscape’ today.

It is these obsessed jewish secular liberals and their similar protestant conservative and liberal partners living by the morality to take care of yourself, your family, near community and similar thinkers. Students conforming and with compliant potential are granted scholar ships (their education is paid for).
All the rest is a threat to their way of life which they call freedom and grace. But is in fact at the profound expense of others.

These families believe that wealth belongs to them because of their brain capacity, hard work and history. And according to their morality, everything is a competition, hence a threat.
Those less erudite or with less capacity should just serve as servants and be lucky if they are granted, stay away or just die.

Since WWII we have names as well. Some never went away, some emerged.
Just some examples:

New money:
Ford, Goldman Sachs, Citi, HSBC, Coca Cola, Oppenheimer, Murdock, Sumner Redstone, Erkko (Sanoma), Walt Disney, Geffen, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Streetcorp capital, Fidelity, George Soros, Koch, etc.

Old money:
British – Belgian – Spanish – Dutch royal families, Monsanto, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, Rockefeller, Morgan (GE, and Morgan banks), Deutsche Bank, Rothschild, Bush family, Kerry, Baron Michael Grade, etc.

Anyway, those in Forbes magazine’s top.

It is this group that thinks the rest of the world is best reformed in their way and have organised themselves in many concealed platforms over time (UN, WTO, WHO, Bilderberg group, AIPAC, Trilateral Commission, Round Tables, many Lobby groups, Council on Foreign Relations, FED, ECB, BIS, IMF, Asian Development Bank, Plan of the New American Century (PNAC), Pilgrim Society, etc, etc…)
That’s how they really think (!)

These obsessive dominant families, their conforming students and offspring take revolving seats in transatlantic political high offices, institutions linked to banks and commerce (usually as non-executives, council members, governors or investors).
Finance of countries, business and wars depended on them, thus governments, their institutions and media.

It has formed the liberal jewish-christian tradition of modelling the western society by growth-economy in which we live today with the US Dollar as world reserve and trade fiat-currency. Anti-Russia, anti-islam have deeply rooted in those high networks as well, and everything standing is in their way is a radical or even a terrorist.

In Russia, the situation was totally different again. Russia is Orthodox Christian and Tsar Nicolas kept those greedy obsessive powers under control. The Romanovs were the world’s richest.


Archive_Miscellaneous_Znamya_the_USSR_033405_The ruthless capital families wanting to bigger than states cashed out, were nearly gone, or were left with a near dismantled network.

This communist era came out of the Russian revolution with Stalin as Chairman after the their first Chairman elected Lenin died in 1924.

All Russian finance became under control of the Ministry of Finance, called ‘Narkomfin’.

What happened in April 1920 quite quickly was the total destruction of the Baku (Caucasus) oil fields. While the Rotschilds were gone, their partners Nobel brothers were still in operation, but all oil fields were destroyed is a massive raid with hundreds of thousands massacred.

For the Rockefeller and Rotshchilds this was great. Although Rotschild and Nobel had build the first oil tankers from Baku, the plan was that global oil prices would go up high after Bakus’s destruction.
Rockefeller and Rotschild had carved up the market.
As Rotschild-Schiff had financed the Russian revolution and got half of the Romanovs gold, as an extra, they were well compensated for the loss of their Nobel partners in which they still had a stake.

Oil exploitation of the Caucasus now came in the hands of the Soviets with strong reduced capacity but enough and against much higher global price. And this is exactly what Rockefeller, BP, Rotschild and Shell wanted, plus they had been well compensated as an extra on top of their gold seizure.

By November 1921 the State Bank (Gosbank) had the single right to handle foreign currency and valuables. It also set the official price of precious metals and exchange rate, regulating private trade in gold, silver and foreign currency on stock exchanges and cheques and bills of exchange drawn in foreign currency, which were permitted in 1922.

Two re-denominations conducted in 1922 and 1923 increased the value of Soviet paper money. During the 1st round the New Ruble of 1922 exchanged for 10,000 rubles of all that was in circulation in the country. During the 2nd round the New Ruble of 1923 exchanged for 100 rubles of the 1922 issue.

On October 11, 1922, the State Bank was granted the right to issue the chervonets (banknote backed by gold) and became the issuing centre. The chervonets ended spiraling post-war inflation.

It was however impossible to industrialise the USSR by traditional means. The public hardly had cash and savings. Loans abroad weren’t possible due to political reasons and several crises and crashes in the capital world before WWI, and mammoth debt obligations as a result of WWI.
Therefore the first commercial banks appeared in 1920 in Russia. They were strictly for short-term loans for commerce and individuals. Only the state issued Rubles and banknotes and handled long-term loans (investments).

Fierce internal struggles happened after Lenin had died. In the end Trotsky was expelled from the USSR in October 1927 due to vigorous united opposition and demonstrations, but by no way the Soviets would let the western capital jewish banking families return and between 1920 and 1930 the financial regulations reformed and even tightened.

Commercial banking was abolished in 1930 completely and the state took over short-term lending.

The state did its best to issue enough to make the planned economy and its growth possible by the most possible simple means. So, no complex financial products. The state issued money very tightly controlled and based on the gold standard.

The New Ruble and chervonets were backed by gold to a certain amount of grams.

In February 1930 all transactions to sell gold and foreign currency to private individuals for chervonets at a fixed rate were banned, the Soviet currency was withdrawn from foreign exchanges and a quoting commission was set up under the State Bank’s Board to set the exchange rates of foreign currencies.

In May 1932 the functions of the State Bank and those of the long-term investment banks (Prombank, Selkhozbank, Vsekobank and Tsekombank) were finally delineated.

8. WWII and post War USSR (don’t skip this)

Post-WWII- Map of Soviet spheres of -influence-Under Stalin millions of people either died in the war, the result of it, or were deported. Which is a human catastrophe and history will never forgive him, however this blog is about the financial system.

The USSR financial structure remained under full state control since its foundation. Founding the USSR was the goal of the Russian Revolution in 1917. Exports of rubles was prohibited since then, and the Russian state bank (Gosbank) issued just enough to do the central economic planning.

WWII for the USSR was financed by issuing state money by fourfold. No loans were needed.

The cold war started soon after WWII, in the end resulting in Vietnam which finished in 1975.
The reason was that the USSR supported Cuba, Mongolia and Vietnam economically.

Export of rubles was illegal, so this aid was done by credit against hard currency (gold).
Russian credit was interest free. This raged the western heavy politicised banking elite who were (and still are) essentially all over in high western government positions. Kennedy was well aware of this, but he had little choice than to follow. And the nuclear race and competition to the moon began.

In a speech Kennedy was open about conspiracy bigger than the US, partly referring to the deceitful founding of the FED which made the US totally depend on ever growing forced upon debt with interest, and partly referring to those dominant power elite who basically ran the world behind the curtains.
And for a while he issued debt free US notes as alternative of the mandatory fiat lending dollar at interest by the FED causing ever growing debt.
Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 and issuing of US notes ended.

The role of foreign trade of goods In the USSR was minor, less than 1%. The East block wanted self-sustainability. This was possible as Russia is big enough with all natural earth’s resources on its own soil.
Foreign trade quota were controlled by Moscow. Gold or goods were used for the limited trade outside the East block. E.g. Russia would deliver steel to Fiat. In return Fiat gave Russia the tooling and parts to produce their own variant of Fiat models (Lada).
Also US industry did business. Sometimes the USSR needed American grain when crops had failed and vice versa. For this, the USSR had to lend dollars with interest…

Where did the US had to get their money… more lending with interest from the FED as they did since 1913… which are private bankers from the start… the same in fact who were behind WWI, the Russian revolution, the Wallstreet crash of 1929 and WWII.

Because of the mammoth cost of the cold war (Vietnam and the race to the moon), in 1971 Nixon found his nation in spiraled debt. He had to let go the gold standard. Auditing the FED wasn’t possible. No one was allowed into the vaults. And for certain, almost all gold was sold to finance the cold war and Vietnam. The value of the dollar plummeted.

But the cold war had cost the USSR as well. The ruble was still backed by gold, but also Russia had to pay a heavy price. Russian gold reserves had sunk to an all time low. The cold war also had drained Russia’s satellite countries such as Hungary, DDR, etc.
The Hungarian revolution was a result as people suffered financially and we very frustrated.

But also the US and Europe were in deep economic crisis after 1973. In Britain it was the same.

The reasons were twofold.

the American industrialists and Wallstreet supported Japan. In short time, Japan’s image of inferior failing products became good, smart and very economic.
Europe and the US were flooded with these products and complete traditional European industries collapsed such as ship building, and the car industry contracted. Specially in Britain it almost vanished.
Coal industry vanished in Britain and Europe. Cheap US coax flooded these markets.

Of course who did benefit from it… During the Japan-Russian war, Rotschild-Schiff already had supported Japan, and this time it was no different for the transatlantic bankers and industrialists who were still in place. They made Japan (and crashed it in the 90s).

the oil embargo of 1973 where the Arab OAPAC proclaimed the oil block as a response to the pro-Israel support by the US in the Arab-Israel war. In that war Sadat of Egypt and Assad of Syria lead the Arab world to again wipe Israel away since it was proclaimed by deceitful corrupt nature.
The story of how Israel truly came about isn’t exactly all that well against the original inhabitants, and certainly isn’t anything we learned in college or from the media. In fact it is one of militant aggression, segregation and cruel expansion. And it is no wonder the Arabs were/are furious.
During Assad’s and Saddat’s campaign, Egypt had crossed the Suez Canal. The US came into action as Israel itself and that Canal is an investment of the Rothschild as well.
And their business with Shell, British OPAC (now BP) and Rockefeller’s met Exxon, Chevron and Mobil had build up all decisive oligopolies with all investments and clientele such as Winston Churchill, before the Arab countries had proclaimed independence after WWII, then nationalising all of their investments (oil industry).
Moscow replied by pausing its correspondence with Nixon and not take any action. Brezhnev said that ‘the US acted too nervous and seemed so easily frightened. We will not unleash a 3rd world war’.

The Middle East is a story of its own, profoundly explained here:
Puinhopen van het Arabisch Westen (~15,000 words, Dutch).

Again you’ll come across the same heavy politicised corrupted industrial names who completely had divided and segregated the century old quiet living of the Arabs within the Ottoman empire… for oil… And establish totally unnatural borders after WWI by use of their top political network (Sykes-Picot) and by leading and financing the zionist movement to establish Israel, also via corruption (Balfour Declaration).

In 1975 again an oil crisis began. OPEC simply wanted a better price. Oil that time was sold very cheap. So they started to limit transport.

petrodollar2-290x290Very viciously, Kissinger (a protégé of Rockefeller and also member of the Bilderberg group) established the petrodollar in 1975, agreed with Saudi Arabia and OPEC to stop the US dollar from falling and oil prices going up. It was agreed now that all international trade was to be done by the dollar.

(Kissinger worked for the Rockefellers prior to his political career and studied on their costs.)

The petrodollar was the Trojan horse as well to bring down the East block.
But it also meant that the entire world would now depend on it.

It is since then that the dollar gets it value by expansion of international trade (thus more debt) since gold backing was ended in 1971. If the market for dollars (thus trade, thus debt) does not expand, it falls and brings the entire financial system down. Since then… extra more growth by expansion/debt, one way or another, is a must.

During the 70s and 80s the USSR depended heavily on various fuel exports. Partly, it was a way to pay its first ever national debt, but the USSR was also considered to be an extreme reliable supplier of oil and gas.
The petrodollar also meant that there was to be no alternative than to receive dollars for Russian gas, oil and other products (as western gold was mainly gone).
The East block became depending on the fiat dollar in steps, which is a debt with interest system and became without hard backing on top of that.

Now in the first time of hundreds of years of history, Russia became depended on the Rotschild banking system… but without any hard currency behind it (gold).

As Russia now also ran into financial problems, countries like the DDR (and other USSR satellite countries) found themselves in difficulties to finance backed by Russia . The DDR needed money and had no alternative than lending it from the west, based on the petrodollar to keep the economy going, at interest of course. However, how could it back that up… It couldn’t and the DDR went bankrupt

Technological developments were reasonably on par with Europe and the US in the 50s and 60s.
From 1970 onwards, industrial development and science in the East block started to lag behind. There simply was shortage of East block investment capital as a result of the cold war and by the peg to the fiat-petrodollar (growing debt with interest without hard backing).
Although the East block was oppressive, people very much became frustrated by the growing difference compared to the west.

The world was tumultuous but with both the USSR and Western economy down, Raegan and Thatcher came to tandem-power as conservative neoliberals when the 80s began. From Raegan it is clearly known that he too came to power via the Bilderberg group financing and media network. What were they up to now again.

Both Britain and the US were economically in shatters by the cold war, Vietnam and by the big oil crises in the 70s. And American capitalisation of Japan flooded both continents with products they could not complete with.
Europe’s rebuild was near complete as well. The US had profited highly from that to-rebuild-market. In fact, that was the deal behind the Marshal Plan and willingness to help Europe to dismantle Germany’s occupation. But Europe was stagnated in the 70s and 80s, so European business for the US halted as well.
Corrupting South-America with dollars and control over their resources had come to an end as well. In fact it would contract.

Mainly because of severe shortage of capital, the mechanisation, science and product development in the USSR fell behind. This resulted in ever more failing of grain crops and thus the USSR had to lend more dollars to import goods and grain. Exporting goods to keep the financial balance didn’t work since Russian products had become inferior due to the grown lack of capital, thus investments. And export of oil and gas alone wasn´t enough.

The western banking elite obliged happily to lend since there was no room for other western expansion which the petrodollar needed. It meant huge profits again for them.

The nuclear disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 was the last straw, illustrating the collapse of the USSR.

9. The new Russia, the Dollar-Ruble

debtDuring the 80s, Gorbachev came to power. He was simply confronted with the financial situation of the USSR and frustrated people such as in the DDR. Shortly after the wall fell, I’ve been there and what I noticed was a totally rotten, fallen and ruined infrastructure in East Berlin. Almost everything was heavily smogged, untidy and broken.

Today I understand why… All currency was drained and the East had nothing to offer anymore to exchange since most gold went to the west because of spiraled debt pegged to the US dollar.

It made investments impossible as the USSR simply was bankrupt not able to develop anything.

After the Berlin wall fell in 1989, on 29 May 1990 Boris Yeltsin was elected chairman of the new Russian Supreme Soviet. On 12 June 1991 he was elected by popular vote to the newly created post of President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), at that time one of the 15 constituent republics of the Soviet Union.

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) was founded, July 13, 1990.
During this break-up of the USSR, regional currencies emerged.
Tumultuous times, but Russia kept the Ruble.

Russia faced the fact that it was totally bankrupt and was depending on the US dollar now.
It was forced to lend at the IMF, which is (of course) under control of Rotschild capital.

The CBR is owned by ‘The city of London’ and takes it orders from London and Washington.
This is not London as a community and city, but the financial district of London, called ‘The City’.
By Washington I mean, the government. But all staff there and many government officials in the US (check it yourself) are Wallstreet sharks since the FED exists.

Russia may not print money itself. The CBR depends totally on the US dollar, and takes orders from the Bank of England, IMF, FED and the American government.

This is how creation of new Rubles goes:

Russian private businesses and Russia itself (e.g. Gazprom) receive dollars by foreign trade.
The CBR then buys all the dollars received and brings the equivalent of new rubles into circulation.
The CBR is also forced to buy worthless US government bonds which are in the hands of the western commercial banks in order to lend money at interest to the US government (but had become worthless). The FED also buys some of those, but defers them to the CBR.

So basically new dollars come into existence while destructing people’s wealth… But that’s not new since the FED… Just this time Russia has been schemed into it…

10. Russia’s fight for financial sovereignty

When Putin was elected in 2000, he faced Russia bankrupt and completely hijacked by the financial western elite. The nation owed $16.6 billion to the IMF, which is basically under the regime of Rotschild. Russian foreign debt to the Rothschild-controlled Paris & London ‘Club Of Creditors’ was over 36 billion dollars.

1101071231_400Putin took advantage of the boom in world oil prices by redirecting a portion of the profits of Russia’s largest oil and gas producer Gazprom so as to pay off the country’s debt. The continual surge in oil prices and Russia’s direct contracts with Iran and Syria (historic oil and gas rich neighbours near the Caucasus) made that the Caucasus and the Middle East rule provide world with oil and specially natural gas.
Europe became largely depend on Gazprom.

It all greatly accelerated Russia’s capacity to restore financial sovereignty.

The fight in Afghanistan is nothing else than the creation of the first western independent gas pipeline as it was the first thing to secure when NATO arrived. And Iraq was a false flag.
The Taliban had abandoned the western deal, but the west wants it pipe.

The same goes for the a line over Syria which British engineers started to build from Qatar over all the pro-west Arab nations via Saudi Arabia to Turkey. Just pro-Russia Syria was in the way. Assad didn’t approve but the engineers continued building. This was late 2009.
Another crucial line goes from Egypt over Syria to the Caucasus bypassing Israel.
The Arab spring in 2010?
All tumult and rebelling started exactly where those lines run, which is no coincidence.

By 2006 Putin had paid off Russia’s debt. Russia’s financial dependence on the Rotschild-mafia financiers was now over. Putin could then establish what became his Russian Unity Party’s campaign slogan: ‘Putin’s Plan Means Victory For Russia! ‘

This slogan continues to make the western politicised banking elite very nervous…

In Dec. 2007 Putin was the Person of the Year in Times Magazine.
Soon after he and Russia are being portrait as bad continuously.

The CBR system has not changed yet, but now all debt is paid is back.

The establishment of BRICs and its AIIB (alternative to World Bank) is the next step and well underway. The BRICs countries are motivated to unwrap their dependence on the fiat-petrodollar, FED, World Bank and IMF.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

But after MH17 and the fast boycott of the west, the inflow of dollars of course plummeted which made the Ruble’s value fall by 39%.

So apparently… this was part of the plan too… To disrupt Russia financial sovereignty and force it back under Rotschild debt control.

Putin wants nothing to do with that and has stated on December 15 2014 that the CBR will become a state bank again. He has even filed an international arrest against the Rotschild family, as a symbol.
As a direct result, Dec. 15, 2014, all traders were messaged to be aware that the USD/RUB pair will be discontinued further and are requested not to open new USD/RUB positions.

The CBR has become the main share holder too again of the Sberbank of Russia. Founded in 1841,
it’s the oldest people’s savings bank in Russia providing short-mid-term loans and exchange for small business people’s use.

It was under state control during both rulings of the Tsar and USSR.

After the US/EU coup d’état over Ukraine, boycotting the Sberbank was promoted by the new US/EU-Ukraine puppet government.

So basically Putin has disconnected short-mid-term low risk exchange and lending for the people and smaller commerce from high risk commercial and state bulk investment lending which is (still) pegged to the dollar and under direct regime of Rotshchild-banking. And he made a 1st step to disconnect the exclusive money issuing by the fraudulent common mandatory debt according to the same Rotschild system.

The 1st disconnection existed on mainland Europe just not too long ago (before 2006) which has brought Europe the highest living standard in the world. This entanglement has been proposed already several times after the financial crash of 2007/8. But as all banks in the west are now in the hands of few big private commercial financial barons with exclusive right to issue electronic currency (debt), they have refused, aka lobby strong against it from the highest top (BIS and Trilateral Commission), so will never pass any government or EU. It evens needs breaking up treaties and guidelines.

It would be a step forward indeed, but as long as common electronic currency can be created exclusively by private privileged entities from nearly nothing and backed by nothing, inflated massively by nothing for mandatory common lending/debt at interest (they control and manipulate) on top of it,
we and entire nations remain hijacked…;

we will remain living in a down-spiral of ever less money available, ever more fiercely compete against each other for less cash, burn out ever more, live from disaster to disaster, from crises to crises and from war to war, hence extra spiraled debt for militarism.
And in the process we clearly notice common wealth flowing to the top of the financial pyramid accelerated since 2006, as common services and securities are destroyed…;

at the high expensive of we the people.

There… we have it. Russia is ‘fighting’ hard for its financial sovereignty.