THE RUSSIAN DOLLAR

__
__
RubleSymbolIn April 2012 I started this blog. I am deeply motivated to expose the crooked dysfunctional financial system we all live in today. It’s causing wars and crises. 2007/8 Was no exception. And it’s causing high tension now between Russia and the US/EU.

I encourage reading earlier posts and also to forget about ‘Zeitgeist’ or ‘Thrives’ for a moment.

Both have done a great job, but they explains high finance before 2000 which is already deeply rotten. But it has exponentially accelerated since 2000 and crashed in 2007/8 because of a critical new ingredients: the fast rise of the Swaps, and specially the fast rise of the Credit Default Swap (CDR).

The CDR is recognised to be the prime cause of the last crash which was almost fatal.

The financial rotten system since 2000 in its core is really very simple to understand.
Explained here: The Daily Lie.
And very elaborate, including names of those responsible, here: Modern Plofkip Bankieren (Dutch).

Short:
Growth = Must = Manipulation to growth = Must
If Growth = not = Economic collapse

We are now in 2015…. Something changed? Nope. Tension between the US/EU and Russia is next.
People should rise up based on present knowledge, not on what was…

If we don’t understand how the elite cooks their banquet today, and as long as we are behind reading past methods, then they will keep hijacking us and we must eat their tasty but vicious dinner.

Then the elite will deal with us rather than we deal with the elite.

1. Russia

In this post I will explain the Russian financial structure, as it’s pegged to the US dollar and IMF as well.
The BRICs countries are tired of it and motivated to unwrap their dependence on it.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

Putin can do this now, since Russia is totally debt free again since 2006 (!)

Putin was very clear during the Valdai World Order Discussion Club, 2014.
Officially recorded and published on Youtube

He stated seeing a bi-polar world. In other words, two world trade and reserve currencies systems existing in parallel, rather than a global pegging to the US dollar and IMF power only.
Also China favours it, as do Brasil, India and South Africa. And more countries will be joining BRICs.

Historic awareness is crucial. We should learn from it, however;

after reading this section 1 and 2, you can scroll straight to 8, but I would read section 4 too;
it explains the direct financing of Rotschild-Schiff of the Russian Revolution in 1917 which was to establish the USSR for decades to come.

In essence:

Before 1917 (Tsar ruling) and during Soviet ruling, no commercial bank ever was allowed to become bigger than the state (the opposite in Europe already in 1885). And no commercial bank was ever allowed to create money. Peter the Great standardised the silver Ruble. It was the only lawful mean of exchange in Russia. Although gold and platinum denominations were also accepted.

This had worked well during the 500 century era of the Tsar and vast decades of the USSR.
It contaminated in the 70s and 80s. The disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 illustrated the last straw.

I’m not saying that Russia was exactly heaven. Eurasia was in constant war and people suffered.
And jewish oil barons in the Caucasus and steel magnates later used workers almost as slaves.
Social and economic conditions in Eurasia were dreadful.

Russia was portrayed being far behind on the west. But Russians, mainly farmers, lived very simple. At least the Russian finance system itself was healthy. It was stable and could not be dominated by the jewish system of Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff.

During the 70s and 80s Russia (then USSR) started to depend on the US dollar…

2. The Caucasus and Middle East (don’t skip this)

450px-Caucasus_regions_mapThe Caucuses borders to Iran and Turkey, laying between the Black and Caspian Sea.

The Ukraine with the Crimea lays closely strategically nearby, North at the Black Sea.

Oil, natural gas and all other resources in the Middle East AND The Caucasus provide the majority of the lot we all depend on.

This was already since decades before WWII and it’s why Hitler launched operation Barbarossa.

He depended half on Rockefeller’s Standard Oil via the Union Bank corp. of NY where Prescott Bush had a leading position in the board (grandfather of G.W. and Jeb Bush). The other half came from synthetic petrol made by IG Farben.

Ford Germany made the majority of trucks for WWII and they could run on both. Of course Ford and Rockefeller were business partners. Car barons need oil barons. And Ford was anti-Semitic, so supporting Hitler as well.

Thyssen (steel baron and canon producer) saw trouble coming before WWII and opened business in NY to secure his big German industry. He established the Union Bank corp. of NY with Bush and made sure his Nazi war machines could be capitalised via this way. Also the Nazi party banked there.
But Hitler wanted a self-supportive 3rd Reich and had shortage of oil, so started Barbarossa. The battle of Stalingrad was the final turning point for that operation… It was all about Caucasian oil… as it is today.

Later in this post I will show that Stalin was a strong union leader of oil refinery in the Caucasus before he came to power during WWI in where the Russian revolution took place. Orchestrated and financed in gold billions by the Rotshchild partners, Stalin had direct contact with. It resulted in the USSR for decades to come.

You may say… come on now, this is 2015.
Well, is it?
Our western world today is deeply shaped and carved as a result of WWI, II and Vietnam.
First Iraq and now the so called Arabian spring and Ukraine are the latest game changers.

All structures and borders today are a direct result of past treaties and guidelines from those wars.
All recent big world institutions came as a result, and newer ones were constructed to overrun Asia, such as the Asian Development Bank (ADB) which is run by the same executive top officials from the UN, ECB, FED, WTO, World bank, IMF, and the private societies such as Council on Foreign Relations
(is non-governmental), Trilateral Commission (same), etc.

The ADB finances the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. That line is the actual prime cause of the US and Europe to step in. That lines is to be the 1st independent connecting line to Europe, to be finished in 2017. All the rest was a show for the oblivious. The entire story: Economy War and Realism.

More than half of the world’s resources of oil and gas are concentrated in and around the same region: Caucasus, Middle East… Also shale gas is present… Donetsk (East Ukraine).

Now, do we get the total picture ?

Corruption-Essay-In-EnglishRuthless intensely politicised private business wants to grab it all. Perhaps nations want self-sustainability, but they depend on their politicised industry and banking barons. Their networks and protégés occupy high positions.

And moreover, they totally depend on private deep politicised financiers since they still have the exclusive right to issue money out of new government debt (bonds) in both the EU and US. In the US since the FED and in the EU since the treaty of Lisbon, 2007.

See, where Rutte came from, Unilever (old Rockefeller bastion), Wouter Bos and Bolkenstein…. both from Royal Dutch Shell…
Many politicians and state officials also come from ING, Hommen, Rinnooy Kan (member of the Trilateral Commission (TLC), or Citybank, Onno Runding (also TLC).
Weijffels: Rabobank, SER, World bank, now retired but wrote an ultra-thin booklet how to reform the financial system which is a laugh. He had a leading position in the World bank. When a plane crashes we get elaborate big reports… This guy knows much better, but won’t change anything.

Look at where Joe Biden’s and John Kerry’s sons are positioned in executive positions in Burisma (shale gas exploiting, found in Donetsk a few years ago) and in investment corporations to finance it.
Or see where vice president Dick Cheney under Bush went to… CEO of oil field service company Halliburton (pipes, tooling, construction) active in the Middle East. Quite handy after false flag Iraq blown to pieces by his government.
Look where almost all US presidential staff and secretaries still come from, Goldman Sachs and other Wall street banks. The NY FED under the US FED is privately owned.
It’s the same everywhere. Draghi, president of the ECB came from Goldman Sachs. He’s also leading in the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Deutsche Bank co-owns the FED (last research). All the FED’s presidents were/are directly from Wallstreet as well.

Royal Dutch Shell recruits most non-executives from Deutsche Bank (DB).
DB financed WWII and now with Goldman Sachs ruined Greece financially by the crashing Swaps.
Ministers of Finance, many came/come from banking and returned later, or were put there afterwards.
Christine Lagarde of the IMF… same thing.
Older families like Rockefeller have senators and states men in place, or the Bush family…

Jeb Bush was Chairman for setting up the Project of the New American Century (PNAC) with Netanyahu, and early American Neoconservatives such as Cheney, Powell, Rice and so on, in collaboration with the Neoliberals. We got false flag Iraq from that bunch and it explains almost no difference between the two American parties Democrats and Republicans. Jeb is now governor of Florida. Cheney CEO of Halliburton…

Jeb Bush’ PNAC spans decades and is to overrun the world and secure Israel. Iraq was the first step. These totally inner-obsessed small minds believe that the world should be modeled after the US. They arrogantly believe it would be the best for mankind… While the US itself is a massive patsy of selfish greed and total corruption.

After TTIP the US and EU will be one dominant force to accomplish it… that is for sure.
And NATO and the US army will be its armed force !!

They will bring the rest of the world in ruins… again !!
Jeb Bush might run for presidential election in 2016 !!

And the list goes on and on…

World business, politics, banks, media are all the same bunch. Feel free to read earlier posts where all is fundamentally connected and exposed with names.

Is this 2015? No it isn’t. It is still ape land.

3. Pre WWI (pre Russian Revolution)

NicolasIISkip it if you want since it has no relation to the dollar today.
But… it tells why Russia already back then had a strong separate standing. Tsars kept state finance away from commercial banking (Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff marriage), steel and oil barons (left: the last Tsar, Nicolas II).

Europe and also Russia were ruled by royal aristocracy. Intermarriages, high finance and wars kept them going.
The house of Romanov ruled in Russia. Anna Palowna, the Tsar’s sister (both Romanov), married the 2nd Dutch king William II for example.

They all had the same banker, the Rotschild family.
They all depended on it.

The reason is that Dutch William III (1650 – 1702) reigned over England, Ireland, Netherlands and all their colonies such as the (first) early 13 North American Colonies.

Basically, William III reigned over a quarter of the world.

Of course gold and silver were looted from those countries, but long and many expensive wars were common in Eurasia. Britain ran into bankruptcy at one point, although William III had access to most of the gold in the world, but the royal houses lived exorbitant wealthy and wars were expensive.

Rotschild lended William as much as he wanted for 8%. In return Rothschild demanded exclusive right to issue money, instead of the state. It was done.
The Bank of England was erected. Its system was modelled after the 1st private central bank in Amsterdam which was mainly for VOC purposes.
Since then we live by ‘Rothschild banking’ here in the west.

Soon after, entire European royal families became heavily in debt because of their wars and Rothschild soon became bigger than each European nation.

Russia was very different.
The Romanovs and Rothschilds hated each other. Rothschild was massively active in Europe and Russia financing both their oil barons in which royal houses had shares.
But Tsar Nicholas made sure the Rotschilds and similar families would never become more powerful than the state. He kept them smaller. In fact, the Romanovs were the richest in the world.

Russia had the silver Ruble for about 500 years. Peter the Great standardized it to 28 grams of silver.
Higher denominations minted of gold and platinum were available as well.
Russia issued its money, not Rotschild nor intermarried partners Warburg and Schiff.

Meanwhile the western industrialisation based on capitalism had begun. Oil became crucial. The aristocratic elite and new money (industry) in Europe didn’t care all too much about the common people. They just wanted to live their own good life.

The Russian Family of Tsar Nicholas II was different again. They were pious Orthodox Christians. They exemplified all that is precious in a family, namely, Christian piety and love for one’s neighbour.
But again, nonetheless, life in Russia, like in Europe, was terrible and the Tsars ruled autocratic.

Although Rothschild’s related investors financed the build of railroad and access to Russian oil, Russia fell behind on the western industry but that’s was Russia’s way. From a Orthodox Christian morality they believed in simplicity, goodness and love for one’s neighbour. The land provides… a farmer state, like islam in the Ottoman Empire, or the christian puritans in the US.

But during the upcoming industrial revolution ever more people went from their farms to work in privately owned factories where conditions were awful.

Oil from Russian Caucasus was mainly transported to the West for their big industrial barons such as APOC (now BP), Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Royal Dutch Shell (Bataafse Petroleum Maatschappij with the royal house as main share holder), etc.
Deutsche Bank was and still is Shells’ banker. This bank was run by the Rotschild’s Warburg family branch, into WWII and financed the vast majority of industry, war (also WWII) and royal families.
Russia didn’t need much oil, but the western and Russian oil barons pumped, refined and traded it.
The Tsar let them be to a certain point as all royal houses had shares and profit from it.

Workers were almost treated like slaves.

Deutsche Bank is still co-owner of the FED today (most recent research) after it was setup by initiative of Paul Warburg (Jekyll Island meeting to write draft legislation with directly lobby).
The FED was erected in 1913 approved by Congress during the last Christmas recess.
It is a direct lobbied private entity, and still is. Again, Deutsche Bank is still co-owner.

In 1815 something went wrong for the Rothschilds in the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. This congress was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government, to give them complete control over much of the civilized world.

Many of the European governments were deeply in debt to the Rothschilds, so they used that as a bargaining tool. However Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, was against the plan, so the Rothschild world government plan failed.

This left the Rothschilds in total anger. They retaliated 100 years later, agreed by British King George V who envied his cousin Nicolas II.

4. Russian revolution 1917 during WWI

rothschild-hid-hand-orgAnother section you can skip if you want, but…

It does explain how it was financed by Rothschild-Schiff, the Tsar family assassinated as retaliation, all State and Romanovs gold then looted and brought to Paris and London. The Rotschilds leaving the country were very well compensated on top of all, and the USSR under Stalin came out of it. All exactly as they had carefully planned and wanted.

In 1905 Jackob Schiff (a Rothschild intermarried partner as Warburg) financed the war of Japan against Russia. He earned a Medal of the Japanese Emperor ! Schiff’s puppet Teddy Roosevelt won a Nobel Peace Prize !

In the same year (1905), Rothschild’s Reds used the opportunity to attempt a Russian revolution, after an all out country wide worker’s strike in 1904. Even peaceful worker’s demonstrations had led to killings by the guard of the Tsar’s winter palace where workers donated their demands. So Rothschild took the opportunity soon but the attempted coup failed.

WWI was a European expansion by banking war once again. It started with Italy wanting to be a super power and needed financing. Germany was the example. Scattered Italy reunited as Germany did. Italy’s eyes were initially on the the less equipped Ottoman army in Ottoman Libya as an easy prey. That less successful, Italy ignited the Balkan war to form a second front. The assassination of Austrian Archduke Ferdinand by a Serb resulted in WWI as the newspaper hype (who owned them?) blaming Serbia.
Italian Libya was one of the results after WWI.
When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia declared was on Austria-Hungary. Within a few weeks, Germany, Ottoman Turkey and Austria-Hungary were at war with Russia, France and Britain.

Rothschild had the lower hand in funding Russia for WWI, which was the opposite in Europe.
So during WWI Rothschild took advantage to get the upper hand in Russia. It was this Jew, Jacob Schiff, who brought Leon Trotsky (born “Lev Bronstein”) to New York in February 1916.

Trotsky and Lenin both had fled or emigrated to Western Europe since they were senior active figures of the revolutionary Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks and Mensheviks).
They became Marxists and it was in Europe where they could hold constructive meetings without being arrested again.
In New York, Trotsky recruited Russian jews from New York’s Russian jewish immigrant population in the Lower East Side of Manhattan and trained them as revolutionaries.

On March 27 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained jewish communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side, boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiafjord” for a journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in Russia.
(Early March – late February Julian Calendar then used in Russia – an orchestrated revolt in St. Petersburg had already begun know as the February Revolution. It had started on Women’s Day.)

Trotsky’s purpose was to secure and establish a Marxist government under the leadership of Lenin, himself and Stalin. Before departing, Jacob Schiff gave this group 20 million USD in gold.
This came from their special firm setup earlier in NY, called ‘American International corp.’

With support from inside the Social Democratic party and many of the jewish-run soviets, Lenin, joined by Trotsky from New York, gained the upper hand over the Kerensky government.

In August of 1917, the Russian Royal Family fled to Tobolsk in Siberia, after the Tsar abdicated. They stayed at the Governors House until April 1918. They hoped to escape to England where King George V, a Romanov cousin, would hopefully grant them refuge. But he refused due to pressure from jewish lobbies.

After abdication, the still sitting Tsar-era-administration formed a provisional government, but the Red October revolution of 1917 secured Lenin as 1st Chairman of the 1st all-Soviet government.

On April 22 1918, the jew, Jacob Sverdlov, 1st President of the Soviet Union, sent his aide, the jew, Yankel Yakovlev, to Tobolsk to persuade Tsar Nicholas II to agree to sanction the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty. Tsar Nicholas refused for he considered the treaty an ‘eternal disgrace to Russia.’ He did though agree to return to Moscow as he was told that the Germans were willing to grant him asylum.

They got as far as Ekaterinburg in the Urals where the train was halted by the Regional Soviets dominated by four jews, Goloshchekin, Safarov, Voikov and Syromolotov. These four communists appointed the jew, Jacob Yurovsky, son of a local jewish ex-convict, as the head the local Cheka (Soviet Secret Police) in Ekaterinburg. Yurovsky was given the assignment to imprison, plan, and carry out, the assassination of the Russian Royal Family.

Yurovsky brought the Russian Royal Family to a former house of a wealthy jewish merchant named Ipatiev, now made into a prison for the Tsar and his family. It should be noted that Ekaterinburg, named after named after St Catherine the Great, was renamed “Sverdlovsk” in 1924 in honor of Jacob Sverdlov who gave the final order to execute the Russian Royal Family.

On July 4 1918, Yurovsky dismissed all the Russian soldiers who were guarding the Tsar except for a Pavel Medvedev, a Cheka jewish spy. Yurovsky replaced the loyal-to-the-Tsar Russian soldiers with jewish communist assassins from Hungary. That they were Jewish communists from Hungary, their scribbling on the walls indicated.

Karl Marx at the time was also funded by Rothschild. From his education in France and England, Marx developed his personal Communistic ideals and wrote the Communist Manifesto, although we can estimate quite rightly that these ideas, in reality based on dictatorial rule that no one wanted, were refined for public distribution.

The following letter by Baruch Levy, to Marx, reflects Weishaupt’s dictatorial socialism in a Zionistic format:

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this “new world order” the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands” (from `La Revue de Paris’, p. 574, June 1, 1928.

Meanwhile the Rothschild banking family settled the first Russian jews in what was to become Israel, starting in 1880, 17 years prior to the 1st zionist convention in 1897. The Rothschilds took leading positions in the zionist movement, financed the settlements and bought a gigantic piece of land for investments. The Rothschild statue still stand in Tel Aviv and a road is named after the family.
British Lord Rothschild (leader of the British zionist movement) forwarded the Balfour Declaration to the British government which was returned to him signed. It stated that a homeland for the jews in Palestine was to be secured. A part that belonged to the Ottoman Empire. And it all happened.

After the Russian Revolution and establishment of the USSR, each Kibbutz became militarised by Russian weapons to drive the Palestinians out with militia and guerrilla tactics to expand the territory by rapid emerging new settlements, connecting them with roads like a spider web Palestinians were not allowed to use. A tactic still used today.

To no surprise the Palestine people who lived there for centuries revolted. After Israel became a reality in 1948/9, the PLO was formed as a greater revolt with Arafat as leader. The PLO was of course flagged as terrorists.

After the Russian revolution and the entire Romanov’s assassinated, all Russian state and Romanovs gold was brought to Paris and London.
The gold was split. A part for King George V and the other part for Rotschild. With this gold, they bought their direct way further into the FED which had recently come into place via partner and family Paul Warburg via the Jeckyll Island meeting.

Again in the new USSR, the state controlled creation its own money entirely, stopping spiraling inflation.

5. Stalin

stalinWhere did Stalin come from (skip this part too if you want).

Stalin was an unlawful born child as a result of quick one stance adultery sex between Ketevan ‘Keke’ Jughashvili neé Geladze (beautiful 20-year-old woman worked as a laundress for a jewish wine merchant in the Georgian city of Gori) and Maurice Ephrussi who was the 2nd biggest oil magnate in Russia and an agent for Rotschild.

All oil workers lived in the city of Baku (Caucasus oil fields).

Maurice took care of Keke and the child in secret. Stalin was given a job in one of Rotschild’s refineries where he was made a strong leader of the union.

In 1901 already, Baku delivered half the world’s oil. Stalin had great knowledge of the oil industry and his connections to the top of oil and politics were direct. The perfect puppet.

But in 1912, Eduard the Rothschild, Alphonse’s son, sold most of the Rotschild oil interests to Royal Dutch Shell. The Rothschild took most payments in the form of Shell shares.

So after the Soviets came to power the Rothschilds cashed out and left Russia. Their ex-palace is now the Azerbaijan Justice Ministry.

6. The obsessive self-indulged

Jews are to blame for all the world’s misery? That’s not what I am saying.

It’s just that vicious, cruel, ruthless and careless families like Rothschild, Morgan, Warbug, Schiff intermarried and became financially bigger than nations, except for Russia (and the Ottoman empire).

As the jewish population lived in exile, most of them homed in Germany and Russia (and Spain). Any public profession for them was forbidden, so most of them went into currency exchange and business from small to huge industrial scale. The different jewish populations throughout Europe had loose ties. But as they intermarry mostly, the whole is kept segregated.
Their commerce, lobbies and high financial domination over vast parts of Europe, Russia, and later the US, made that they had the upper hand almost everywhere, but behind the scenes.

However, there is a noticeable split into two main groups. The orthodox and secular liberals.
The last group can be majorly found in zionism. Zionists and other secular liberals have nothing with religion (judaism) whatsoever and therefore isn’t anti-Semitic. Orthodox jews oppose zionism.

In general, however, the jewish thought that either socialism or liberalism would bring them to ‘salvation’.
In other words… it doesn’t matter how. This is severely exploited by the obsessive self-indulged and explains community of Kibbutzes, the funding of the Russian Revolution as well, and support of liberal conservative directions and also those via political active faiths. But since a few years the Orthodox have come into mass demonstration against their zionist leaders which is held out of the news.

Zionism is a political segregated movement based on economic and cultural nationalism, no assimilation of others, super capitalism and without compassion of the rest. They denominate themselves as the ‘chosen people’ and think that others have less rights. They are to serve them.
All parties in Israel today carry the name ‘Zion’ in them with a few exceptions.

In the christian world almost the same happened after the reformation, especially in the UK and US. Specially the US is strongly based on protestantism from the beginning. Kennedy was the only catholic president.
In Europe, religion wasn’t a free choice. And so many went to the new continent. The Pilgrims story is famous (the reason why Americans celebrate Thanksgiving) and their bible remains at the heart of the US founding and government, specially even today.

As the US is also the land of opportunity where one could make it as a poor immigrant with modest government controls, it had set the door wide open to corruption of secular protestant and jewish secular families who are extremely obsessed greedy and addicted to power and control while being highly conservative, occupying most of high finance, top politics and top business in the US.
And is in essence, this is still the US and EU ‘landscape’ today.

It is these obsessed jewish secular liberals and their similar protestant conservative and liberal partners living by the morality to take care of yourself, your family, near community and similar thinkers. Students conforming and with compliant potential are granted scholar ships (their education is paid for).
All the rest is a threat to their way of life which they call freedom and grace. But is in fact at the profound expense of others.

These families believe that wealth belongs to them because of their brain capacity, hard work and history. And according to their morality, everything is a competition, hence a threat.
Those less erudite or with less capacity should just serve as servants and be lucky if they are granted, stay away or just die.

Since WWII we have names as well. Some never went away, some emerged.
Just some examples:

New money:
Ford, Goldman Sachs, Citi, HSBC, Coca Cola, Oppenheimer, Murdock, Sumner Redstone, Erkko (Sanoma), Walt Disney, Geffen, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Streetcorp capital, Fidelity, George Soros, Koch, etc.

Old money:
British – Belgian – Spanish – Dutch royal families, Monsanto, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, Rockefeller, Morgan (GE, and Morgan banks), Deutsche Bank, Rothschild, Bush family, Kerry, Baron Michael Grade, etc.

Anyway, those in Forbes magazine’s top.

It is this group that thinks the rest of the world is best reformed in their way and have organised themselves in many concealed platforms over time (UN, WTO, WHO, Bilderberg group, AIPAC, Trilateral Commission, Round Tables, many Lobby groups, Council on Foreign Relations, FED, ECB, BIS, IMF, Asian Development Bank, Plan of the New American Century (PNAC), Pilgrim Society, etc, etc…)
That’s how they really think (!)

These obsessive dominant families, their conforming students and offspring take revolving seats in transatlantic political high offices, institutions linked to banks and commerce (usually as non-executives, council members, governors or investors).
Finance of countries, business and wars depended on them, thus governments, their institutions and media.

It has formed the liberal jewish-christian tradition of modelling the western society by growth-economy in which we live today with the US Dollar as world reserve and trade fiat-currency. Anti-Russia, anti-islam have deeply rooted in those high networks as well, and everything standing is in their way is a radical or even a terrorist.

In Russia, the situation was totally different again. Russia is Orthodox Christian and Tsar Nicolas kept those greedy obsessive powers under control. The Romanovs were the world’s richest.

7. USSR

Archive_Miscellaneous_Znamya_the_USSR_033405_The ruthless capital families wanting to bigger than states cashed out, were nearly gone, or were left with a near dismantled network.

This communist era came out of the Russian revolution with Stalin as Chairman after the their first Chairman elected Lenin died in 1924.

All Russian finance became under control of the Ministry of Finance, called ‘Narkomfin’.

What happened in April 1920 quite quickly was the total destruction of the Baku (Caucasus) oil fields. While the Rotschilds were gone, their partners Nobel brothers were still in operation, but all oil fields were destroyed is a massive raid with hundreds of thousands massacred.

For the Rockefeller and Rotshchilds this was great. Although Rotschild and Nobel had build the first oil tankers from Baku, the plan was that global oil prices would go up high after Bakus’s destruction.
Rockefeller and Rotschild had carved up the market.
As Rotschild-Schiff had financed the Russian revolution and got half of the Romanovs gold, as an extra, they were well compensated for the loss of their Nobel partners in which they still had a stake.

Oil exploitation of the Caucasus now came in the hands of the Soviets with strong reduced capacity but enough and against much higher global price. And this is exactly what Rockefeller, BP, Rotschild and Shell wanted, plus they had been well compensated as an extra on top of their gold seizure.

By November 1921 the State Bank (Gosbank) had the single right to handle foreign currency and valuables. It also set the official price of precious metals and exchange rate, regulating private trade in gold, silver and foreign currency on stock exchanges and cheques and bills of exchange drawn in foreign currency, which were permitted in 1922.

Two re-denominations conducted in 1922 and 1923 increased the value of Soviet paper money. During the 1st round the New Ruble of 1922 exchanged for 10,000 rubles of all that was in circulation in the country. During the 2nd round the New Ruble of 1923 exchanged for 100 rubles of the 1922 issue.

On October 11, 1922, the State Bank was granted the right to issue the chervonets (banknote backed by gold) and became the issuing centre. The chervonets ended spiraling post-war inflation.

It was however impossible to industrialise the USSR by traditional means. The public hardly had cash and savings. Loans abroad weren’t possible due to political reasons and several crises and crashes in the capital world before WWI, and mammoth debt obligations as a result of WWI.
Therefore the first commercial banks appeared in 1920 in Russia. They were strictly for short-term loans for commerce and individuals. Only the state issued Rubles and banknotes and handled long-term loans (investments).

Fierce internal struggles happened after Lenin had died. In the end Trotsky was expelled from the USSR in October 1927 due to vigorous united opposition and demonstrations, but by no way the Soviets would let the western capital jewish banking families return and between 1920 and 1930 the financial regulations reformed and even tightened.

Commercial banking was abolished in 1930 completely and the state took over short-term lending.

The state did its best to issue enough to make the planned economy and its growth possible by the most possible simple means. So, no complex financial products. The state issued money very tightly controlled and based on the gold standard.

The New Ruble and chervonets were backed by gold to a certain amount of grams.

In February 1930 all transactions to sell gold and foreign currency to private individuals for chervonets at a fixed rate were banned, the Soviet currency was withdrawn from foreign exchanges and a quoting commission was set up under the State Bank’s Board to set the exchange rates of foreign currencies.

In May 1932 the functions of the State Bank and those of the long-term investment banks (Prombank, Selkhozbank, Vsekobank and Tsekombank) were finally delineated.

8. WWII and post War USSR (don’t skip this)

Post-WWII- Map of Soviet spheres of -influence-Under Stalin millions of people either died in the war, the result of it, or were deported. Which is a human catastrophe and history will never forgive him, however this blog is about the financial system.

The USSR financial structure remained under full state control since its foundation. Founding the USSR was the goal of the Russian Revolution in 1917. Exports of rubles was prohibited since then, and the Russian state bank (Gosbank) issued just enough to do the central economic planning.

WWII for the USSR was financed by issuing state money by fourfold. No loans were needed.

The cold war started soon after WWII, in the end resulting in Vietnam which finished in 1975.
The reason was that the USSR supported Cuba, Mongolia and Vietnam economically.

Export of rubles was illegal, so this aid was done by credit against hard currency (gold).
Russian credit was interest free. This raged the western heavy politicised banking elite who were (and still are) essentially all over in high western government positions. Kennedy was well aware of this, but he had little choice than to follow. And the nuclear race and competition to the moon began.

In a speech Kennedy was open about conspiracy bigger than the US, partly referring to the deceitful founding of the FED which made the US totally depend on ever growing forced upon debt with interest, and partly referring to those dominant power elite who basically ran the world behind the curtains.
And for a while he issued debt free US notes as alternative of the mandatory fiat lending dollar at interest by the FED causing ever growing debt.
Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 and issuing of US notes ended.

The role of foreign trade of goods In the USSR was minor, less than 1%. The East block wanted self-sustainability. This was possible as Russia is big enough with all natural earth’s resources on its own soil.
Foreign trade quota were controlled by Moscow. Gold or goods were used for the limited trade outside the East block. E.g. Russia would deliver steel to Fiat. In return Fiat gave Russia the tooling and parts to produce their own variant of Fiat models (Lada).
Also US industry did business. Sometimes the USSR needed American grain when crops had failed and vice versa. For this, the USSR had to lend dollars with interest…

Where did the US had to get their money… more lending with interest from the FED as they did since 1913… which are private bankers from the start… the same in fact who were behind WWI, the Russian revolution, the Wallstreet crash of 1929 and WWII.

Because of the mammoth cost of the cold war (Vietnam and the race to the moon), in 1971 Nixon found his nation in spiraled debt. He had to let go the gold standard. Auditing the FED wasn’t possible. No one was allowed into the vaults. And for certain, almost all gold was sold to finance the cold war and Vietnam. The value of the dollar plummeted.

But the cold war had cost the USSR as well. The ruble was still backed by gold, but also Russia had to pay a heavy price. Russian gold reserves had sunk to an all time low. The cold war also had drained Russia’s satellite countries such as Hungary, DDR, etc.
The Hungarian revolution was a result as people suffered financially and we very frustrated.

But also the US and Europe were in deep economic crisis after 1973. In Britain it was the same.

The reasons were twofold.

One,
the American industrialists and Wallstreet supported Japan. In short time, Japan’s image of inferior failing products became good, smart and very economic.
Europe and the US were flooded with these products and complete traditional European industries collapsed such as ship building, and the car industry contracted. Specially in Britain it almost vanished.
Coal industry vanished in Britain and Europe. Cheap US coax flooded these markets.

Of course who did benefit from it… During the Japan-Russian war, Rotschild-Schiff already had supported Japan, and this time it was no different for the transatlantic bankers and industrialists who were still in place. They made Japan (and crashed it in the 90s).

Second,
the oil embargo of 1973 where the Arab OAPAC proclaimed the oil block as a response to the pro-Israel support by the US in the Arab-Israel war. In that war Sadat of Egypt and Assad of Syria lead the Arab world to again wipe Israel away since it was proclaimed by deceitful corrupt nature.
The story of how Israel truly came about isn’t exactly all that well against the original inhabitants, and certainly isn’t anything we learned in college or from the media. In fact it is one of militant aggression, segregation and cruel expansion. And it is no wonder the Arabs were/are furious.
During Assad’s and Saddat’s campaign, Egypt had crossed the Suez Canal. The US came into action as Israel itself and that Canal is an investment of the Rothschild as well.
And their business with Shell, British OPAC (now BP) and Rockefeller’s met Exxon, Chevron and Mobil had build up all decisive oligopolies with all investments and clientele such as Winston Churchill, before the Arab countries had proclaimed independence after WWII, then nationalising all of their investments (oil industry).
Moscow replied by pausing its correspondence with Nixon and not take any action. Brezhnev said that ‘the US acted too nervous and seemed so easily frightened. We will not unleash a 3rd world war’.

The Middle East is a story of its own, profoundly explained here:
Puinhopen van het Arabisch Westen (~15,000 words, Dutch).

Again you’ll come across the same heavy politicised corrupted industrial names who completely had divided and segregated the century old quiet living of the Arabs within the Ottoman empire… for oil… And establish totally unnatural borders after WWI by use of their top political network (Sykes-Picot) and by leading and financing the zionist movement to establish Israel, also via corruption (Balfour Declaration).

In 1975 again an oil crisis began. OPEC simply wanted a better price. Oil that time was sold very cheap. So they started to limit transport.

petrodollar2-290x290Very viciously, Kissinger (a protégé of Rockefeller and also member of the Bilderberg group) established the petrodollar in 1975, agreed with Saudi Arabia and OPEC to stop the US dollar from falling and oil prices going up. It was agreed now that all international trade was to be done by the dollar.

(Kissinger worked for the Rockefellers prior to his political career and studied on their costs.)

The petrodollar was the Trojan horse as well to bring down the East block.
But it also meant that the entire world would now depend on it.

It is since then that the dollar gets it value by expansion of international trade (thus more debt) since gold backing was ended in 1971. If the market for dollars (thus trade, thus debt) does not expand, it falls and brings the entire financial system down. Since then… extra more growth by expansion/debt, one way or another, is a must.

During the 70s and 80s the USSR depended heavily on various fuel exports. Partly, it was a way to pay its first ever national debt, but the USSR was also considered to be an extreme reliable supplier of oil and gas.
The petrodollar also meant that there was to be no alternative than to receive dollars for Russian gas, oil and other products (as western gold was mainly gone).
The East block became depending on the fiat dollar in steps, which is a debt with interest system and became without hard backing on top of that.

Now in the first time of hundreds of years of history, Russia became depended on the Rotschild banking system… but without any hard currency behind it (gold).

As Russia now also ran into financial problems, countries like the DDR (and other USSR satellite countries) found themselves in difficulties to finance backed by Russia . The DDR needed money and had no alternative than lending it from the west, based on the petrodollar to keep the economy going, at interest of course. However, how could it back that up… It couldn’t and the DDR went bankrupt

Technological developments were reasonably on par with Europe and the US in the 50s and 60s.
From 1970 onwards, industrial development and science in the East block started to lag behind. There simply was shortage of East block investment capital as a result of the cold war and by the peg to the fiat-petrodollar (growing debt with interest without hard backing).
Although the East block was oppressive, people very much became frustrated by the growing difference compared to the west.

The world was tumultuous but with both the USSR and Western economy down, Raegan and Thatcher came to tandem-power as conservative neoliberals when the 80s began. From Raegan it is clearly known that he too came to power via the Bilderberg group financing and media network. What were they up to now again.

Both Britain and the US were economically in shatters by the cold war, Vietnam and by the big oil crises in the 70s. And American capitalisation of Japan flooded both continents with products they could not complete with.
Europe’s rebuild was near complete as well. The US had profited highly from that to-rebuild-market. In fact, that was the deal behind the Marshal Plan and willingness to help Europe to dismantle Germany’s occupation. But Europe was stagnated in the 70s and 80s, so European business for the US halted as well.
Corrupting South-America with dollars and control over their resources had come to an end as well. In fact it would contract.

Mainly because of severe shortage of capital, the mechanisation, science and product development in the USSR fell behind. This resulted in ever more failing of grain crops and thus the USSR had to lend more dollars to import goods and grain. Exporting goods to keep the financial balance didn’t work since Russian products had become inferior due to the grown lack of capital, thus investments. And export of oil and gas alone wasn´t enough.

The western banking elite obliged happily to lend since there was no room for other western expansion which the petrodollar needed. It meant huge profits again for them.

The nuclear disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 was the last straw, illustrating the collapse of the USSR.

9. The new Russia, the Dollar-Ruble

debtDuring the 80s, Gorbachev came to power. He was simply confronted with the financial situation of the USSR and frustrated people such as in the DDR. Shortly after the wall fell, I’ve been there and what I noticed was a totally rotten, fallen and ruined infrastructure in East Berlin. Almost everything was heavily smogged, untidy and broken.

Today I understand why… All currency was drained and the East had nothing to offer anymore to exchange since most gold went to the west because of spiraled debt pegged to the US dollar.

It made investments impossible as the USSR simply was bankrupt not able to develop anything.

After the Berlin wall fell in 1989, on 29 May 1990 Boris Yeltsin was elected chairman of the new Russian Supreme Soviet. On 12 June 1991 he was elected by popular vote to the newly created post of President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), at that time one of the 15 constituent republics of the Soviet Union.

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) was founded, July 13, 1990.
During this break-up of the USSR, regional currencies emerged.
Tumultuous times, but Russia kept the Ruble.

Russia faced the fact that it was totally bankrupt and was depending on the US dollar now.
It was forced to lend at the IMF, which is (of course) under control of Rotschild capital.

The CBR is owned by ‘The city of London’ and takes it orders from London and Washington.
This is not London as a community and city, but the financial district of London, called ‘The City’.
By Washington I mean, the government. But all staff there and many government officials in the US (check it yourself) are Wallstreet sharks since the FED exists.

Russia may not print money itself. The CBR depends totally on the US dollar, and takes orders from the Bank of England, IMF, FED and the American government.

This is how creation of new Rubles goes:

Russian private businesses and Russia itself (e.g. Gazprom) receive dollars by foreign trade.
The CBR then buys all the dollars received and brings the equivalent of new rubles into circulation.
The CBR is also forced to buy worthless US government bonds which are in the hands of the western commercial banks in order to lend money at interest to the US government (but had become worthless). The FED also buys some of those, but defers them to the CBR.

So basically new dollars come into existence while destructing people’s wealth… But that’s not new since the FED… Just this time Russia has been schemed into it…

10. Russia’s fight for financial sovereignty

When Putin was elected in 2000, he faced Russia bankrupt and completely hijacked by the financial western elite. The nation owed $16.6 billion to the IMF, which is basically under the regime of Rotschild. Russian foreign debt to the Rothschild-controlled Paris & London ‘Club Of Creditors’ was over 36 billion dollars.

1101071231_400Putin took advantage of the boom in world oil prices by redirecting a portion of the profits of Russia’s largest oil and gas producer Gazprom so as to pay off the country’s debt. The continual surge in oil prices and Russia’s direct contracts with Iran and Syria (historic oil and gas rich neighbours near the Caucasus) made that the Caucasus and the Middle East rule provide world with oil and specially natural gas.
Europe became largely depend on Gazprom.

It all greatly accelerated Russia’s capacity to restore financial sovereignty.

The fight in Afghanistan is nothing else than the creation of the first western independent gas pipeline as it was the first thing to secure when NATO arrived. And Iraq was a false flag.
The Taliban had abandoned the western deal, but the west wants it pipe.

The same goes for the a line over Syria which British engineers started to build from Qatar over all the pro-west Arab nations via Saudi Arabia to Turkey. Just pro-Russia Syria was in the way. Assad didn’t approve but the engineers continued building. This was late 2009.
Another crucial line goes from Egypt over Syria to the Caucasus bypassing Israel.
The Arab spring in 2010?
All tumult and rebelling started exactly where those lines run, which is no coincidence.

By 2006 Putin had paid off Russia’s debt. Russia’s financial dependence on the Rotschild-mafia financiers was now over. Putin could then establish what became his Russian Unity Party’s campaign slogan: ‘Putin’s Plan Means Victory For Russia! ‘

This slogan continues to make the western politicised banking elite very nervous…

In Dec. 2007 Putin was the Person of the Year in Times Magazine.
Soon after he and Russia are being portrait as bad continuously.

The CBR system has not changed yet, but now all debt is paid is back.

The establishment of BRICs and its AIIB (alternative to World Bank) is the next step and well underway. The BRICs countries are motivated to unwrap their dependence on the fiat-petrodollar, FED, World Bank and IMF.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

But after MH17 and the fast boycott of the west, the inflow of dollars of course plummeted which made the Ruble’s value fall by 39%.

So apparently… this was part of the plan too… To disrupt Russia financial sovereignty and force it back under Rotschild debt control.

Putin wants nothing to do with that and has stated on December 15 2014 that the CBR will become a state bank again. He has even filed an international arrest against the Rotschild family, as a symbol.
As a direct result, Dec. 15, 2014, all traders were messaged to be aware that the USD/RUB pair will be discontinued further and are requested not to open new USD/RUB positions.

The CBR has become the main share holder too again of the Sberbank of Russia. Founded in 1841,
it’s the oldest people’s savings bank in Russia providing short-mid-term loans and exchange for small business people’s use.

It was under state control during both rulings of the Tsar and USSR.

After the US/EU coup d’état over Ukraine, boycotting the Sberbank was promoted by the new US/EU-Ukraine puppet government.

So basically Putin has disconnected short-mid-term low risk exchange and lending for the people and smaller commerce from high risk commercial and state bulk investment lending which is (still) pegged to the dollar and under direct regime of Rotshchild-banking. And he made a 1st step to disconnect the exclusive money issuing by the fraudulent common mandatory debt according to the same Rotschild system.

The 1st disconnection existed on mainland Europe just not too long ago (before 2006) which has brought Europe the highest living standard in the world. This entanglement has been proposed already several times after the financial crash of 2007/8. But as all banks in the west are now in the hands of few big private commercial financial barons with exclusive right to issue electronic currency (debt), they have refused, aka lobby strong against it from the highest top (BIS and Trilateral Commission), so will never pass any government or EU. It evens needs breaking up treaties and guidelines.

It would be a step forward indeed, but as long as common electronic currency can be created exclusively by private privileged entities from nearly nothing and backed by nothing, inflated massively by nothing for mandatory common lending/debt at interest (they control and manipulate) on top of it,
we and entire nations remain hijacked…;

we will remain living in a down-spiral of ever less money available, ever more fiercely compete against each other for less cash, burn out ever more, live from disaster to disaster, from crises to crises and from war to war, hence extra spiraled debt for militarism.
And in the process we clearly notice common wealth flowing to the top of the financial pyramid accelerated since 2006, as common services and securities are destroyed…;

at the high expensive of we the people.

There… we have it. Russia is ‘fighting’ hard for its financial sovereignty.

Advertenties

THE DAILY LIE

__
__
Not so long ago democracy and freedom had been established into people’s mind. And even military force is used to establish it. “You shall have freedom and democracy”. On top of that, we live in a world of money. It has become everything these days.

This is a down to earth demonstration of why freedom and democracy don’t exist at all whatsoever. Why our money is based on capital fraud and that we basically live in economic slavery.

Money

20110901_8109552674e5f3f1779f43So let’s first look what drives our world today, and has become the root of all… money.
Everybody wants it and everybody needs it in how our world ticks today.

Where does money come from? Is it made by industry?
No, industrial business simply buys ingredients (very ruthless even), pays their bills and sells the compound delivered at profits. The total netto surplus is then parked as a reserve. To invest it? No, hardly anymore.

Investments are capital expenditures and most always need to be covered by capital loans to be paid back over time, which is nicely called ‘Return on Investment’.

Profits hardly can ever cover capital expenditures these days to assure existence of a creating industry, unless it’s about the valuable geo-commodities (oil, coal, gas, gold, silicon, diamonds, etc.)

The public spends to obtain the end-consumer product made, lured by massive over killing advertisements (mind manipulation is free choice? You’d probably never ask for it if you didn’t know about the product).
The public obtains money by putting energy into paid labour, which is simply part of that monthly bill of the industry. So nothing extra value is really added.
This mass of rather small consumer money flowing back to industry, simply is too little to make capital expenditure possible.

So where does capital come from?
In order to keep materialisation going, capital needs to be created.
But where does that process begin.
First of all that process has become the exclusive right of commercial banks, which are owned by some private individuals.

Despite what many people still may think otherwise, nor the government nor any central bank have the authority anymore to create capital.
In the US this is the case since 1913. In Europe this model has been copied in 2007; settled in the European guideline CRD-IV and treaty of Lisbon, dec. 2007. Thanks to the corrupt network of politician-bankers, (hidden titles, roulating  jobs and side positions for most well known faces).

Everybody needs capital, including governments and house owners who need a mortgage.
Yet, governments can’t produce it themselves nor can they get it via any central bank, and not via the ECB or the FED. This so called direct financing has become prohibited by the EU and US government.

So where do they get it.
By taking loans at investment banks by auctioning their governments bonds to them. No other channels of high finance are open anymore.

These banks simply create it upon computer-entry. Hard backing isn’t needed. Basel II accords gave banks the freedom to insure billions at a security bank (like AIG was, or now Credit Suisse or Goldman Sachs are for example. But most banks today have an insurance business, also often neatly called ‘security’ or ‘asset management’).

But… insurance has no backing either since these insurance banks live under the same Basel accords.

So no hard assets of their own are needed at all.
0,7 Million can simply be insured for a 1000 million just by a piece of paper which has no underlying value. There is no hard backing (gold backing has ended already a long time ago, in 1971.)

Capital fraud

FraudReally? Yes, really.
Well, in 2019 (Basel III) the banking reserves need to be 7% in 2019, which is still a laugh.

Is your mortgage just 7% of your individual income?

This system of creation is only allowed to create capital in the field of real estate, government loans and funding of pensions… only for that…

So those fields have become the big business and main focus since ~2000, and explains mega farms, huge empty office buildings, governments in debt and crooked manipulation of pension calculations.

Yet, you, I, businesses and governments must always borrow at some point, and we all must do so against rather high interest. There is no escape from it.

But why. The money never existed in the first place, or at ridiculous low price for the banks.
Actually, they borrow it from the ECB (in Europe) or FED (in the US). Their interest rates have only dropped further to respectively 0,05% and 0,25%. Only the commercial banks can use it. No one else. That’s simply means free money for the commercial banks (!)

So banks can borrow 700,000 against 0,05%, and then insure that for 1000,000,000, for a small quarterly premium over the 700,000 while the insurance itself has no underlying value, nor does the insurance bank have hard assets to cover.
These insurances are called ‘Swaps’ and are considered the prime cause of the near financial collapse in 2007.

Those Swaps are traded for speculation as well. They speculate on bankruptcy of entire countries, local governments and your mortgage.

Only the entity taking the loan pays big interest and over the entire 1000,000,000… 2,5%, 4,0%, etc.
Why do we have to pay interest? And why do we need to pay it back?
And why ~ 500 – 1000 times more interest than the principle interest of only 0,05%.

And more critical (!).
Why have private entities (commercial banks, thus billionaire private owners) have the exclusive right to create money based on hardly anything we all depend on?
They get filthy rich by the interest over something that never existed. And putting energy into labour doesn’t add capital as we have discovered.

Perpetual debt

debt_ball_chain_connect_400_clr_8710This demonstrates that capital can only come into roulation by perpetually adding debt to the public, and for the profit of private owners who can do so because they are allowed to do so…
since only they haven been given the exclusive right to bring it into roulation.

And where does the money come from to cover the interest we must pay…
only by new loans since that money doesn’t exist in the initial capital created…
and again against ~500 – 1000 time the interest compared to the principle of 0,05%.

So,
Does hard labour bring wealth and financial independence?
No, it doesn’t. Energy into labour doesn’t add anything, it only turns around what already exists.
Sure, for selfishness and status it may work for a while for some. But that is pure selfishness, and some will even accuse others who are not in such position.

The majority has been accustomed to the idea that hard work is the only good thing, otherwise is often called lazy and lacks status.

We learn this during our education and the entire society is build on this idea. Many people simply can’t imagine something else. All thanks to politics, education, reformation (which has a large part to do with it and is the so called ‘christan-jewish society’), media, businesses, etc.

Does consumption add to wealth?
No, it doesn’t.
Consumption does not add  anything. It only turns around what already exists and basically strengthens the poison. And it only adds to short term ‘feel good’… for a short while. It only adds to individualism, thus strengthens selfishness.

And worse,
Since we all live to pay high multiplied interest, and private entities have the exclusive right to create capital against extremely low interest for them from barely nothing, the outcome can only be that the mass need to put ever more energy into labour for less perpetual pay which clearly is the trend since decades.

Free money for the über rich

The ones owning billions, don’t need to put any energy into anything. A billion dollars or euros just gives massive leverage by interest alone just by staying in bed and sleeping (!) For their kids they can buy the best education (thus network), so they strengthen that morality later on.

All the above given, this can only mean that they suck the existing mass of money to them automatically. And since that process is exponentially, the mass of money available for the average person becomes less while public debt goes up perpetual, again feeding just a few again.

Can our politicians do something about this?
No, they can’t. They live by the same status quo.
Do they at least represent the public?
No, they represent their own interest groups and lobbies.

The daily lie

constitution-burning1Then, does democracy and freedom exist? And will hard work create wealth for the public?
Unfortunate, all depends on money these days. And politicians can’t create that, nor can they change the way it goes.

They who profit will further pay to get their way. They buy a media-outlet, or start an investment company, or a big private charity (which is also investment banking in the same system).

They also decide which party or presidential campaign to support financially and who gets the best benefits on all concentrated media. The candidates with the best support simply will win.

All speak the same language. And politicians depend on private funding from the interest groups and lobbies, or at least on their pressure. Public media also co-operates with private media, share (re)sources and they all copy, paste daily the same text creating hypes that way.
And not seldom, journalists and owners of media outlets once were politicians, had been their spin masters, or they are at least politically highly engaged.

Journalists and politicians simply wheel and deal in closed settings.
The holders of media always want heavy social political influence (almost no exception). Media therefore is always biased because of heavy concentration these days of all media, their titles and belonging to a dominant few holding companies.

Enough examples:
Sanoma (Aatos Erkko, also officially listed as CIA informant), GE (JP Morgan), ProSiebenSat.1, Rupert Murdock, Bertelsmann, Baron Michael Grade, Bouygues, Times Warner (Morgan), Sumner Redstone, Disney, Emir of Qatar.

The dominant International press agencies are no more than ~15 at the most and all are privately owned, except the two in Russia and China:
Bloomberg, CNN, UPI, AP, Reuters, BBC, AAP, DPA, IPS, AFP, ANP, Belga, Agencia Internacional, Xinhua, Interfaks, ITAR-TASS.

Anything you read and see is highly likely a title or copy-paste from them all of the above, at least  in Europe, Australia and US.
And for magazines in Netherlands. Almost all titles are now owned by Sanoma.

But we can elect a party, can’t we?
And? Are they able to create capital and spending room for the best of public use?
None of them whatsoever. They are slaves of the same money masters.

The destruction of public wealth

shadow02The system as described in this article doesn’t create wealth. It destroys it and sucks it all out into the direction of some private entities. It’s a multiplication model in an exponential way.

No other or any logical conclusion is possible at this moment.

I hear some say: “just work hard and create your chances”.

Well, that worked in the 60s and 70s yes when there was almost unlimited room for universal growth. But the system today is obstructed.

I even heard people say the poor are profiteers and there should be no reason why they obtain money by less initiative. Success or not is suppose to depend all on yourself according to the general moral of today…

Really…
Okay, suppose one day we all do that super energy thing?
And then what.
Can all earnings then cover all debt and interest? Does it change something?
Selfishness and thus blindness on the short term is what changes.
But worse, competition can only spiral up between people perpetually, obtaining less roulated public money available since the capital+interest only flows back to the ones who obtained exclusive right to create it by their crooked financial system constructed as explained.

In other words, all individuals want a chunk from the total mass of money in roulation, but ever less becomes available for all of them… and so competition can only spiral up. It explains ever more people with burnouts and it explains that total public debt is ever expanding by spreading it over more people since it’s the only way to obtain money. Students are already put on huge debt when starting their professional life… It’s extremely inhumane and criminal.

The current financial system destroys public wealth. And this is what we see happening, but nobody is doing something about it. Politicians are blind to their own agenda following their way only. And they represent their highly powerful invisible network only. There is nothing they can do or change the system.

Where does this all end…
On the long run, it can never cover the way it works today. It will suck the masses dry as the way it goes now. And what’s even worse, the only economy left to keep our way of life will become expansion via weapons and war. This is already happening. It’s why we see increasing military activities all over. It has nothing to do with religion. Religion is economically exploited to justify war to keep our current system going.

Freedom and democracy are your world and your illusion…welcome (!)

I’m sure something better is possible

998102_533658876747557_1621734652_nCertainly, work helps the community and society to some point, but why must it be in an economic slavery model as explained in this article.

We can help out each other in different ways by sharing, helping and immaterial gratitude.

As far as I see it, it doesn’t have to be via the current method of basically economic slavery.

Many ways are already available to obtain food for free. It simply grows. Water is for free. It falls down clean from the sky. It just needs to be gathered. Heating and electricity of course are more complex.

But I’m quite sure that if a community would put their heads together they’d come with solutions. Heating simply can be resolved. Electricity is a more complex thing, but not impossible as Nikola Tesla has already demonstrated ~100 years ago. For instance, he showed that electricity can be freely obtained unlimited from the atmosphere and distributed by air or earth. Basically sand is a silicon and does let electricity flow through. The air guides it as well by nature. Tesla showed that the free unlimited energy can be controlled without the need of paid distribution. Investors blocked his work because profits weren’t possible. Tesla didn’t care about money. He wanted to give mankind free unlimited energy.

More about Tesla

GOUD EN HET GROTE MALI LEUGEN

__
__
homepic2012Vast lezers van deze Blog begrijpen inmiddels waarom het westerse financiële systeem faalt en zal blijven falen. Het is enkel gebaseerd op fiat-geld dat alleen commerciële banken mogen aanmaken op niets.

Dat niets wordt permanent ‘opgeblazen’ door middel van derivaten zoals swaps en securites. Het kan slechts gedijen bij exponentiële groei van internationale business op basis van de Petrodollar.
Hoe dat disfunctioneert leg ik hier niet meer uit. Daarvoor kunt u het beste deze twee artikelen lezen.

Modern Plofkip Bankieren
The Biggest Scam in History (Youtube)

Ondanks de crash van 2008 is het systeem niet gewijzigd. De gevolgen zijn monsterlijk en permanent. Groei van publieke schuld is en blijft evident binnen dat systeem. Dat leidt continu tot bezuinigingen opgelegd aan het publiek, en tot ‘noodzakelijke’ oorlogen voor expansie van internationale business en die toegang en transport verschaffen van en tot aardse rijkdommen voor consumptie en welvaart. Daarbij vindt een blijvende massale waarde-overheveling plaats van publiek naar private investeerders. Binnen de EU werd het zelfs ‘vastgelast’ met de verdragen van Maastricht en Lissabon.

In de VS wordt het spel gespeeld door continu benoemingen van meest gevreesde Wallstreet-haaien voor topfuncties in staff en regeringen zoals Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, Lew et cetera. Via de Bank for International Settlements (BIS) en World Trade Organisation (WTO) crashten zij daarbij het systeem in ruil voor megawinsten en superbonussen. Presidenten zijn ‘puppets’. Ze komen aan de macht middels campagne-donaties uit cirkels van Wallstreet, aandeelhouders van de FED waar de ‘haaien’ een sleutelpositie hadden, de BISTrilateral Commission (TLC), WTO, IMF, Bilderberg netwerk, et cetera.

Aan de Europese kant ging het niet anders. Dezelfde corruptie heeft trans-Atlantisch plaatsgevonden met ‘bevriende’ netwerken zoals daar ook zijn de WTO, IMF, TLC, Atlantische Commissie, Bilderberg netwerk, Dexia, Paribas, Shell, BP, Fortis, RBS, Barclays, UBS, ING, Citigroup, ABN Amro, Rabobank, HSBC, Goldman Sachs Europe, Rothschild continuation holdings, IceSave, Deutsche Bank, de ECB, BIS en centrale banken van de lidstaten. Een paar bekende Nederlandse namen: Wellink, Wijffels, Groenink, Hommen, Elco Brinkman, Ruding, Balkenende, Bos, Zalm, de Koningshuizen van GB en Nederland… Denk Europees aan namen zoals Sarkozy, Draghi, Monti, Papandreou, Papadimos, Ackermann, Merkel, Steinbrück, Trichet, Carney, Weber, Tietmeyer, Blair, Brown…

Terug naar goud-backing van geld

goldDiverse grote naties hebben ingezien dat het westerse financiële systeem niet functioneert en hebben zich daarom rond 2010 losgemaakt van de Petrodollar en het IMF, te weten: Brazilië, Rusland, India, China en Zuid-Afrika. Zij vormen de BRICs-landen. Argentinië kwam er bij bij en Japan in de zomer van 2013. Indonesië volgt. Deze landen hebben goed door dat het westerse financiële systeem
faalt en besloten tot bilaterale handel van commodities (olie, gas, goud, zilver, etc) op basis van hun eigen munten in plaats van de Petrodollar. Ook Iran en Syrië staan aan de kant van de BRICs. Iran verkoopt olie en gas op basis van Roebels en de Yuan.
De BRICs-landen besloten begin 2013 een equivalent van het IMF te organiseren; een eigen reserve-instituut om het IMF heen. Oprichting van een eigen investeringsbank werd eveneens overeengekomen.

Welke munt zal de reservemunt van de BRICs-landen worden: de Chinese Yuan.

Voormalig Chinees staatshoofd Hu Jintao kondigde aan de Yuan weer volledig te ‘backen’ met goud. China is al 5 jaar op een rij de grootste goudproducent ter wereld en is snel op weg dit in stilte te realiseren. China cumuleert al jaren enorme goudreserves. Enerzijds produceert het zelf ca. 360 ton per jaar. Anderzijds steeg import van goud jaarlijks tot ver over 400 ton. Officieel rapporteert de Chinese Centrale Bank ca. 1.000 ton goudreserve, maar realistische schattingen tonen 6.000 ton. De VS is met 8.000 ton nog de grootste bezitter van goudreserves, maar dit zal niet lang meer duren.

Big 10 goudmijnen en hun eigenaren

China: Shandong Gold Group is grootste producent ter wereld, expandeert internationaal snel, heeft een enorm eigen financierings-campus en wordt door de staat gecontroleerd.

Canada met Gold Corp en Barrick Gold Corp als grootste producenten naast Yahama, Kinross Gold en Eldorado Gold. Ze hebben eveneens projecten in de US, Brazilië, Chili, Rusland en Ghana.

Australië met Newcrest mining en Focus Minerals Ltd als belangrijkste producenten.
51% Van Focus behoort tot de Chinese Shandong Gold Group.

VS, Newmont Mining. Productie neemt al jaren af.

Rusland met Polyus Gold als grootste gouddelver. Jaarlijkse productiestijging van ca. 5%.

Zuid-Afrika met AngloGold Ashanti en Gold Fields die grotendeels Afrika domineren met Canada.

Winstgevende grote goudmijnen in Afrika bevinden zich momenteel in Ghana en Mali. De meeste in Zuid-Afrika zelf maken geen winst meer. Daarnaast spelen goudmijnen in landen zoals Peru, Indonesië, Uzbekistan, Ghana mee in de top 10.

Mali staat nu nog op plaats 11, maar zal de grootste exporteur in Afrika worden. De mijnen vallen onder Zuid-Afrikaans AngloGold Ashanti. De overheid van Mali heeft 18% aandelen in bezit.

Europa heeft dringend goud nodig

De euro en Petrodollar zijn ‘giftig’. De Yuan heeft wél een gezond fundament met goud als backing.
In stilte zijn er plannen om de euro weer te backen met goud, maar Europa heeft het na WWII opgeslagen in de VS en krijgt het niet terug.

Europa zelf bezit geen goudmijnen en heeft beperkte toegang tot de bestaande; de dichtstbijzijnde prospects zijn Ghana en Mali. China heeft een enorme greep in de wereldvoorraad en breidt het uit.
De Canadese, Australische, Amerikaanse en ook Zuid-Amerikaanse goud-mijnprojecten zijn moeilijk of zelfs niet toegankelijk voor Europa. En de FED weigert Europees goud gewoonweg terug te geven aan landen als Duitsland, Frankrijk en Nederland. Daarnaast daalt goudproductie in de VS. Australisch alsook Zuid-Afrikaans goud gaat grotendeels naar China. Ook Mauretanië is een ex-Franse kolonie en exporteert goud naar Frankrijk en China, maar de productie is relatief gering en niet strategisch.

Brazilië, Rusland, China en Zuid-Afrika zijn BRICs-landen en Indonesië zal zich eveneens aansluiten.

Angela Merkel en Hollande (maar ook Charles de Gaulle al in de jaren 60) hebben door dat het westerse financiële systeem permanent is gecrasht als gevolg van de wijze waarop het monetair ‘giftig’ op niets is gereconstrueerd zoals de US dollar, en ook nog eens gebaseerd op de Petrodollar voor expanderende internationale handel. De schuldenberg neemt dientengevolge alleen maar toe. Merkel vroeg dit jaar niet voor niets het Duitse goud terug. Nederland stelde als volger van Duitsland dezelfde vraag maar dit werd uit het nieuws gehouden. Voor Merkel (dus Rutte) en Hollande is inflatie een ‘no go area’. Dus zit er maar één ding op… Goud roven uit Afrika.

Goudkoorts Mali

Randgold BillboardAl tijdens het vroegere grote rijk van Mali stond het al bekend om de enorme rijkdommen aan goud. Het klaterde er volop. Mali is een voormalige Franse kolonie, maar bleef altijd aan het lijntje. De voertaal is Frans, de munt bleef een afgeleide van de Franc. In 2012 werd er ook Uranium ontdekt. Bovendien werd in datzelfde jaar ontdekt dat grote diamant-aders voor komen. Ondanks alle verhalen in de mainstream-media kan maar één conclusie worden getrokken waarom Frankrijk Mali binnentrok na vondst van Uranium, en vanwege Goud en potentie van diamantwinning… Ouderwets imperialisme. Frankrijk is afhankelijk van kernenergie waarvoor Uranium nodig is, maar bovenal…
Vanwege de goudmijnen in het zuiden. Door het Noorden te bezetten en af te grendelen, wil de Franse overheid voorkomen dat het Zuiden (de mijnstreek) in handen komt van de rebellen. Daar ligt ook de potentie van de diamantaders en het Uranium.

Landonteigening

Er speelt meer in het midden en zuiden van Mali. Wie denkt dat het land een soort van woestijn is, kent de situatie niet. Het midden en zuiden van Mali zijn uitermate vruchtbare gebieden. De bevolking bestaat uit kleine boeren die letterlijk van hun land kunnen leven, al vele generaties. De ministers van de pro-westerse regering hadden en hebben vaak rondetafelgesprekken met grote landbouw-investeerders uit GB, VS, Frankrijk en Nederland om de Malinese landbouw te intensiveren.

De boeren willen hun land niet verkopen, omdat ze niets met geld hebben. Voor deze boeren is hun land het gegarandeerde levensmiddel van bestaan; hun levensgarantie, dat van hun families en kinderen. De regering heeft echter land-opkoopprogramma’s opgezet, gepromoot door lokale radio’s. Weerstand is echter groot. De investeerders willen o.m. suikerrietproductie en andere landbouw sterk intensiveren. 

Suiker(riet) is al een belangrijk exportproduct, maar de investeerders en regering willen méér winst. Onbelangrijk voor de boeren. Zij kunnen immers leven van hun land zonder geld en dus zonder schuld. Weerstand bleef aan. Het land ombouwen naar intensieve productie betekent dat ze óf hun land moeten verkopen zonder alternatieve middelen van bestaan, óf dure westerse zaden moeten kopen. Die zaden zijn duur, omdat een grote ‘race’ gaande is door elk patent van elke soort op te kopen.

Vooral Monsanto heeft een wereldwijd agressief opkoopprogramma van zaden. Alleen in Nederland zijn die technologische zaden vrij verhandelbaar, maar in de rest van de wereld meestal niet. Een firma zoals Monsanto bouwt een werkelijke monopolie-positie uit… en dupeert zo de landbouw, en vooral arme boeren in Afrika die gedwongen worden naar westers kapitalisme. Noem deze gehele methode maar gerust imperialisme.

Verkoop betekent verlies van een gegarandeerd levensmiddel van bestaan. Ombouwen betekent schulden (microkrediet). Zowel de opkoop van de gronden als microkrediet werkt volgens de methode van Modern Plofkip Bankieren, maar is voor de boeren zonder geld direct een woekerproduct vanwege hoge rente. En loonslaven, dat willen de mensen niet. Waarom zouden ze, ze konden immers levens van hun land en zonder geld en schuld. 

De investeerders en pro-westerse regering willen hun zin en dus kwam landonteigening op gang. Dit leidt tot ontheemding en verarming voor de lokalen en mogelijk vele vluchtelingen later terug op zoek naar zekerheid. Landonteigening voor uranium, diamant en goudwinning werkt op dezelfde manier.

De Malinese bevolking verliest keihard hun soevereiniteit voor ordinair westers gewin. Het zijn simpelweg ingrediënten voor oorlog, rebellie en slachtoffers. En vanzelf spinnen de vele zgn. goede doelen er later ook weer volop garen bij. Zie Goede doelen als Geldmachines.

Wie zijn de Milanese rebellen

Op Tv zien we uiteraard weer volop ant-islam propaganda, sharia en jihadisten. Maar 90% van de Malinese bevolking is al islamiet en sharia wordt in geen enkel islamitisch land toegepast. Het is van toepassing in Iran en heeft enkel betrekking op familiezaken en erfrecht. Daar is niets engs aan, maar anders dan westerse begrippen. Bovendien erkent de islam westerse universele rechten van de mens niet, omdat het niet compleet is volgens islamitisch moreel. De verbeterde universele islamitische verklaring van mensenrechten werd in 1981 overeengekomen binnen de islamitische gemeenschap. Daarin werd onder meer opgenomen dat mensen per definitie recht hebben op eerste levensbehoeften zoals onderdak en voedsel. In het westen zijn dat géén basisrechten. En binnen de neoliberale wereld is dat al helemaal geen basisrecht. Je moet er voor werken, en steeds meer voor steeds minder. Zo werkt het binnen de islam niet. Voedsel moet er altijd gedeeld worden en islamieten doen dat daarom altijd ruimhartig zonder aanzien des persoons. Het strookt allemaal niet met de westerse kapitalistische socio-economische gedachte.

Ik ben geen voorstander van enig georganiseerd geloof, omdat ik van mening ben dat het voornamelijk ellende veroorzaakt, polarisatie, discriminatie, intolerantie, onwetendheid, verdomming der mensen en halsstarrigheid.

Maar de eentonige anti-islam-geluid (rebellen, jihadisten, terroristen) in onze westerse media, daar moeten we niet meer in trappen, de geopolitieke achtergrond kennende.

Het zijn strijders vóór soevereiniteit… los van de westerse kapitalistische socio-economische val… ofwel los van imperialisme. De Toearegs strijden met hen. Ze streden in Libië, steunden Qadhafi en kwamen zwaar bewapend terug. Waarom? Qadhafi was weliswaar een vreemde vogel, maar had de GoudDinar geïntroduceerd en begon zo olie op basis van Roebels te verkopen…
Hij vormde zo een volledig soevereine staat. Foute boel voor de Petrodollar (dus ook voor de euro en Europa). Het land werd gedestabiliseerd en Qadhafi vermoord. Van een Arabische lente was daarom nooit sprake.

Men hoort het NOS-journaal en RTL-nieuws nooit zeggen: “Franse troepen hebben met steun van GB hun voormalige kolonie Mali ingenomen omdat zij met Nederland en Duitsland ernstig verlegen zitten om goud. Maar Mali heeft wat het zij hebben willen. Daarom gaat het ‘vrije Westen’ Mali bevrijden van haar goud, zoals het Libië heeft bevrijd van haar aardolie”.

Onze westerse media toont nooit de waarheid vanwege hoge concentratie van neoliberale macht en eenkennigheid. Dat ga ik hier niet toelichten. Hoe dat zit kunt u hier lezen:

Economy, War and Realism.
De Nederlandse spin-, en leugen-media wordt hier uitgelegd: Welcome to the Real World.

Uitbuiting en Imperialisme anno 2013

Grote schandalen werden al getoond dat kinderen in de Malinese goudmijnen werken. Die zijn eigendom van het Zuid-Afrikaanse AngloGold Ashanti. Dit bedrijf kreeg eerder de rating “het meest immorele bedrijf ter wereld”. De Malinese overheid is pro-westers en heeft 18% van de aandelen. Maar de bevolking is de armste ter wereld en crepeert. Dat rebellen strijden voor een soevereine situatie. Dit is een zéér begrijpelijke zaak. De as Frankrijk-GB-Nederland-Duitsland zal echter alles doen het te onderdrukken en te voorkomen.

Het bewijst wederom aan dat geld en kostbaarheden volgens het westerse kapitalistische socio-economisch model publieke welvaart vermindert waar het aan de macht is en zelfs vernietigt. Voor ons als burgers in Europa, en helemaal voor de allerarmste zoals in Afrika. Het vernietigt zelfs mensenlevens op grote schaal onder het mom van continu grote leugens en ernstige misleidingen.

En het toont aan waarom Mali voor Europa zo belangrijk is… Ouderwets imperialisme… en het westerse geldsysteem dat totaal ontspoorde door massale trans-Atlantische hebzucht en corruptie.