THE RUSSIAN DOLLAR

__
__
RubleSymbolIn April 2012 I started this blog. I am deeply motivated to expose the crooked dysfunctional financial system we all live in today. It’s causing wars and crises. 2007/8 Was no exception. And it’s causing high tension now between Russia and the US/EU.

I encourage reading earlier posts and also to forget about ‘Zeitgeist’ or ‘Thrives’ for a moment.

Both have done a great job, but they explains high finance before 2000 which is already deeply rotten. But it has exponentially accelerated since 2000 and crashed in 2007/8 because of a critical new ingredients: the fast rise of the Swaps, and specially the fast rise of the Credit Default Swap (CDR).

The CDR is recognised to be the prime cause of the last crash which was almost fatal.

The financial rotten system since 2000 in its core is really very simple to understand.
Explained here: The Daily Lie.
And very elaborate, including names of those responsible, here: Modern Plofkip Bankieren (Dutch).

Short:
Growth = Must = Manipulation to growth = Must
If Growth = not = Economic collapse

We are now in 2015…. Something changed? Nope. Tension between the US/EU and Russia is next.
People should rise up based on present knowledge, not on what was…

If we don’t understand how the elite cooks their banquet today, and as long as we are behind reading past methods, then they will keep hijacking us and we must eat their tasty but vicious dinner.

Then the elite will deal with us rather than we deal with the elite.

1. Russia

In this post I will explain the Russian financial structure, as it’s pegged to the US dollar and IMF as well.
The BRICs countries are tired of it and motivated to unwrap their dependence on it.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

Putin can do this now, since Russia is totally debt free again since 2006 (!)

Putin was very clear during the Valdai World Order Discussion Club, 2014.
Officially recorded and published on Youtube

He stated seeing a bi-polar world. In other words, two world trade and reserve currencies systems existing in parallel, rather than a global pegging to the US dollar and IMF power only.
Also China favours it, as do Brasil, India and South Africa. And more countries will be joining BRICs.

Historic awareness is crucial. We should learn from it, however;

after reading this section 1 and 2, you can scroll straight to 8, but I would read section 4 too;
it explains the direct financing of Rotschild-Schiff of the Russian Revolution in 1917 which was to establish the USSR for decades to come.

In essence:

Before 1917 (Tsar ruling) and during Soviet ruling, no commercial bank ever was allowed to become bigger than the state (the opposite in Europe already in 1885). And no commercial bank was ever allowed to create money. Peter the Great standardised the silver Ruble. It was the only lawful mean of exchange in Russia. Although gold and platinum denominations were also accepted.

This had worked well during the 500 century era of the Tsar and vast decades of the USSR.
It contaminated in the 70s and 80s. The disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 illustrated the last straw.

I’m not saying that Russia was exactly heaven. Eurasia was in constant war and people suffered.
And jewish oil barons in the Caucasus and steel magnates later used workers almost as slaves.
Social and economic conditions in Eurasia were dreadful.

Russia was portrayed being far behind on the west. But Russians, mainly farmers, lived very simple. At least the Russian finance system itself was healthy. It was stable and could not be dominated by the jewish system of Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff.

During the 70s and 80s Russia (then USSR) started to depend on the US dollar…

2. The Caucasus and Middle East (don’t skip this)

450px-Caucasus_regions_mapThe Caucuses borders to Iran and Turkey, laying between the Black and Caspian Sea.

The Ukraine with the Crimea lays closely strategically nearby, North at the Black Sea.

Oil, natural gas and all other resources in the Middle East AND The Caucasus provide the majority of the lot we all depend on.

This was already since decades before WWII and it’s why Hitler launched operation Barbarossa.

He depended half on Rockefeller’s Standard Oil via the Union Bank corp. of NY where Prescott Bush had a leading position in the board (grandfather of G.W. and Jeb Bush). The other half came from synthetic petrol made by IG Farben.

Ford Germany made the majority of trucks for WWII and they could run on both. Of course Ford and Rockefeller were business partners. Car barons need oil barons. And Ford was anti-Semitic, so supporting Hitler as well.

Thyssen (steel baron and canon producer) saw trouble coming before WWII and opened business in NY to secure his big German industry. He established the Union Bank corp. of NY with Bush and made sure his Nazi war machines could be capitalised via this way. Also the Nazi party banked there.
But Hitler wanted a self-supportive 3rd Reich and had shortage of oil, so started Barbarossa. The battle of Stalingrad was the final turning point for that operation… It was all about Caucasian oil… as it is today.

Later in this post I will show that Stalin was a strong union leader of oil refinery in the Caucasus before he came to power during WWI in where the Russian revolution took place. Orchestrated and financed in gold billions by the Rotshchild partners, Stalin had direct contact with. It resulted in the USSR for decades to come.

You may say… come on now, this is 2015.
Well, is it?
Our western world today is deeply shaped and carved as a result of WWI, II and Vietnam.
First Iraq and now the so called Arabian spring and Ukraine are the latest game changers.

All structures and borders today are a direct result of past treaties and guidelines from those wars.
All recent big world institutions came as a result, and newer ones were constructed to overrun Asia, such as the Asian Development Bank (ADB) which is run by the same executive top officials from the UN, ECB, FED, WTO, World bank, IMF, and the private societies such as Council on Foreign Relations
(is non-governmental), Trilateral Commission (same), etc.

The ADB finances the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. That line is the actual prime cause of the US and Europe to step in. That lines is to be the 1st independent connecting line to Europe, to be finished in 2017. All the rest was a show for the oblivious. The entire story: Economy War and Realism.

More than half of the world’s resources of oil and gas are concentrated in and around the same region: Caucasus, Middle East… Also shale gas is present… Donetsk (East Ukraine).

Now, do we get the total picture ?

Corruption-Essay-In-EnglishRuthless intensely politicised private business wants to grab it all. Perhaps nations want self-sustainability, but they depend on their politicised industry and banking barons. Their networks and protégés occupy high positions.

And moreover, they totally depend on private deep politicised financiers since they still have the exclusive right to issue money out of new government debt (bonds) in both the EU and US. In the US since the FED and in the EU since the treaty of Lisbon, 2007.

See, where Rutte came from, Unilever (old Rockefeller bastion), Wouter Bos and Bolkenstein…. both from Royal Dutch Shell…
Many politicians and state officials also come from ING, Hommen, Rinnooy Kan (member of the Trilateral Commission (TLC), or Citybank, Onno Runding (also TLC).
Weijffels: Rabobank, SER, World bank, now retired but wrote an ultra-thin booklet how to reform the financial system which is a laugh. He had a leading position in the World bank. When a plane crashes we get elaborate big reports… This guy knows much better, but won’t change anything.

Look at where Joe Biden’s and John Kerry’s sons are positioned in executive positions in Burisma (shale gas exploiting, found in Donetsk a few years ago) and in investment corporations to finance it.
Or see where vice president Dick Cheney under Bush went to… CEO of oil field service company Halliburton (pipes, tooling, construction) active in the Middle East. Quite handy after false flag Iraq blown to pieces by his government.
Look where almost all US presidential staff and secretaries still come from, Goldman Sachs and other Wall street banks. The NY FED under the US FED is privately owned.
It’s the same everywhere. Draghi, president of the ECB came from Goldman Sachs. He’s also leading in the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Deutsche Bank co-owns the FED (last research). All the FED’s presidents were/are directly from Wallstreet as well.

Royal Dutch Shell recruits most non-executives from Deutsche Bank (DB).
DB financed WWII and now with Goldman Sachs ruined Greece financially by the crashing Swaps.
Ministers of Finance, many came/come from banking and returned later, or were put there afterwards.
Christine Lagarde of the IMF… same thing.
Older families like Rockefeller have senators and states men in place, or the Bush family…

Jeb Bush was Chairman for setting up the Project of the New American Century (PNAC) with Netanyahu, and early American Neoconservatives such as Cheney, Powell, Rice and so on, in collaboration with the Neoliberals. We got false flag Iraq from that bunch and it explains almost no difference between the two American parties Democrats and Republicans. Jeb is now governor of Florida. Cheney CEO of Halliburton…

Jeb Bush’ PNAC spans decades and is to overrun the world and secure Israel. Iraq was the first step. These totally inner-obsessed small minds believe that the world should be modeled after the US. They arrogantly believe it would be the best for mankind… While the US itself is a massive patsy of selfish greed and total corruption.

After TTIP the US and EU will be one dominant force to accomplish it… that is for sure.
And NATO and the US army will be its armed force !!

They will bring the rest of the world in ruins… again !!
Jeb Bush might run for presidential election in 2016 !!

And the list goes on and on…

World business, politics, banks, media are all the same bunch. Feel free to read earlier posts where all is fundamentally connected and exposed with names.

Is this 2015? No it isn’t. It is still ape land.

3. Pre WWI (pre Russian Revolution)

NicolasIISkip it if you want since it has no relation to the dollar today.
But… it tells why Russia already back then had a strong separate standing. Tsars kept state finance away from commercial banking (Rotshchild-Warburg-Schiff marriage), steel and oil barons (left: the last Tsar, Nicolas II).

Europe and also Russia were ruled by royal aristocracy. Intermarriages, high finance and wars kept them going.
The house of Romanov ruled in Russia. Anna Palowna, the Tsar’s sister (both Romanov), married the 2nd Dutch king William II for example.

They all had the same banker, the Rotschild family.
They all depended on it.

The reason is that Dutch William III (1650 – 1702) reigned over England, Ireland, Netherlands and all their colonies such as the (first) early 13 North American Colonies.

Basically, William III reigned over a quarter of the world.

Of course gold and silver were looted from those countries, but long and many expensive wars were common in Eurasia. Britain ran into bankruptcy at one point, although William III had access to most of the gold in the world, but the royal houses lived exorbitant wealthy and wars were expensive.

Rotschild lended William as much as he wanted for 8%. In return Rothschild demanded exclusive right to issue money, instead of the state. It was done.
The Bank of England was erected. Its system was modelled after the 1st private central bank in Amsterdam which was mainly for VOC purposes.
Since then we live by ‘Rothschild banking’ here in the west.

Soon after, entire European royal families became heavily in debt because of their wars and Rothschild soon became bigger than each European nation.

Russia was very different.
The Romanovs and Rothschilds hated each other. Rothschild was massively active in Europe and Russia financing both their oil barons in which royal houses had shares.
But Tsar Nicholas made sure the Rotschilds and similar families would never become more powerful than the state. He kept them smaller. In fact, the Romanovs were the richest in the world.

Russia had the silver Ruble for about 500 years. Peter the Great standardized it to 28 grams of silver.
Higher denominations minted of gold and platinum were available as well.
Russia issued its money, not Rotschild nor intermarried partners Warburg and Schiff.

Meanwhile the western industrialisation based on capitalism had begun. Oil became crucial. The aristocratic elite and new money (industry) in Europe didn’t care all too much about the common people. They just wanted to live their own good life.

The Russian Family of Tsar Nicholas II was different again. They were pious Orthodox Christians. They exemplified all that is precious in a family, namely, Christian piety and love for one’s neighbour.
But again, nonetheless, life in Russia, like in Europe, was terrible and the Tsars ruled autocratic.

Although Rothschild’s related investors financed the build of railroad and access to Russian oil, Russia fell behind on the western industry but that’s was Russia’s way. From a Orthodox Christian morality they believed in simplicity, goodness and love for one’s neighbour. The land provides… a farmer state, like islam in the Ottoman Empire, or the christian puritans in the US.

But during the upcoming industrial revolution ever more people went from their farms to work in privately owned factories where conditions were awful.

Oil from Russian Caucasus was mainly transported to the West for their big industrial barons such as APOC (now BP), Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Royal Dutch Shell (Bataafse Petroleum Maatschappij with the royal house as main share holder), etc.
Deutsche Bank was and still is Shells’ banker. This bank was run by the Rotschild’s Warburg family branch, into WWII and financed the vast majority of industry, war (also WWII) and royal families.
Russia didn’t need much oil, but the western and Russian oil barons pumped, refined and traded it.
The Tsar let them be to a certain point as all royal houses had shares and profit from it.

Workers were almost treated like slaves.

Deutsche Bank is still co-owner of the FED today (most recent research) after it was setup by initiative of Paul Warburg (Jekyll Island meeting to write draft legislation with directly lobby).
The FED was erected in 1913 approved by Congress during the last Christmas recess.
It is a direct lobbied private entity, and still is. Again, Deutsche Bank is still co-owner.

In 1815 something went wrong for the Rothschilds in the Congress of Vienna, which started in September, 1814 and concluded in June of this year. This congress was for the Rothschilds to create a form of world government, to give them complete control over much of the civilized world.

Many of the European governments were deeply in debt to the Rothschilds, so they used that as a bargaining tool. However Tsar Alexander I of Russia, who had not succumbed to a Rothschild central bank, was against the plan, so the Rothschild world government plan failed.

This left the Rothschilds in total anger. They retaliated 100 years later, agreed by British King George V who envied his cousin Nicolas II.

4. Russian revolution 1917 during WWI

rothschild-hid-hand-orgAnother section you can skip if you want, but…

It does explain how it was financed by Rothschild-Schiff, the Tsar family assassinated as retaliation, all State and Romanovs gold then looted and brought to Paris and London. The Rotschilds leaving the country were very well compensated on top of all, and the USSR under Stalin came out of it. All exactly as they had carefully planned and wanted.

In 1905 Jackob Schiff (a Rothschild intermarried partner as Warburg) financed the war of Japan against Russia. He earned a Medal of the Japanese Emperor ! Schiff’s puppet Teddy Roosevelt won a Nobel Peace Prize !

In the same year (1905), Rothschild’s Reds used the opportunity to attempt a Russian revolution, after an all out country wide worker’s strike in 1904. Even peaceful worker’s demonstrations had led to killings by the guard of the Tsar’s winter palace where workers donated their demands. So Rothschild took the opportunity soon but the attempted coup failed.

WWI was a European expansion by banking war once again. It started with Italy wanting to be a super power and needed financing. Germany was the example. Scattered Italy reunited as Germany did. Italy’s eyes were initially on the the less equipped Ottoman army in Ottoman Libya as an easy prey. That less successful, Italy ignited the Balkan war to form a second front. The assassination of Austrian Archduke Ferdinand by a Serb resulted in WWI as the newspaper hype (who owned them?) blaming Serbia.
Italian Libya was one of the results after WWI.
When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, Russia declared was on Austria-Hungary. Within a few weeks, Germany, Ottoman Turkey and Austria-Hungary were at war with Russia, France and Britain.

Rothschild had the lower hand in funding Russia for WWI, which was the opposite in Europe.
So during WWI Rothschild took advantage to get the upper hand in Russia. It was this Jew, Jacob Schiff, who brought Leon Trotsky (born “Lev Bronstein”) to New York in February 1916.

Trotsky and Lenin both had fled or emigrated to Western Europe since they were senior active figures of the revolutionary Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (Bolsheviks and Mensheviks).
They became Marxists and it was in Europe where they could hold constructive meetings without being arrested again.
In New York, Trotsky recruited Russian jews from New York’s Russian jewish immigrant population in the Lower East Side of Manhattan and trained them as revolutionaries.

On March 27 1917, Trotsky and his 300 well-trained jewish communists from Manhattan’s Lower East Side, boarded the Norwegian steamer “Kristianiafjord” for a journey that brought them to St. Petersburg in Russia.
(Early March – late February Julian Calendar then used in Russia – an orchestrated revolt in St. Petersburg had already begun know as the February Revolution. It had started on Women’s Day.)

Trotsky’s purpose was to secure and establish a Marxist government under the leadership of Lenin, himself and Stalin. Before departing, Jacob Schiff gave this group 20 million USD in gold.
This came from their special firm setup earlier in NY, called ‘American International corp.’

With support from inside the Social Democratic party and many of the jewish-run soviets, Lenin, joined by Trotsky from New York, gained the upper hand over the Kerensky government.

In August of 1917, the Russian Royal Family fled to Tobolsk in Siberia, after the Tsar abdicated. They stayed at the Governors House until April 1918. They hoped to escape to England where King George V, a Romanov cousin, would hopefully grant them refuge. But he refused due to pressure from jewish lobbies.

After abdication, the still sitting Tsar-era-administration formed a provisional government, but the Red October revolution of 1917 secured Lenin as 1st Chairman of the 1st all-Soviet government.

On April 22 1918, the jew, Jacob Sverdlov, 1st President of the Soviet Union, sent his aide, the jew, Yankel Yakovlev, to Tobolsk to persuade Tsar Nicholas II to agree to sanction the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty. Tsar Nicholas refused for he considered the treaty an ‘eternal disgrace to Russia.’ He did though agree to return to Moscow as he was told that the Germans were willing to grant him asylum.

They got as far as Ekaterinburg in the Urals where the train was halted by the Regional Soviets dominated by four jews, Goloshchekin, Safarov, Voikov and Syromolotov. These four communists appointed the jew, Jacob Yurovsky, son of a local jewish ex-convict, as the head the local Cheka (Soviet Secret Police) in Ekaterinburg. Yurovsky was given the assignment to imprison, plan, and carry out, the assassination of the Russian Royal Family.

Yurovsky brought the Russian Royal Family to a former house of a wealthy jewish merchant named Ipatiev, now made into a prison for the Tsar and his family. It should be noted that Ekaterinburg, named after named after St Catherine the Great, was renamed “Sverdlovsk” in 1924 in honor of Jacob Sverdlov who gave the final order to execute the Russian Royal Family.

On July 4 1918, Yurovsky dismissed all the Russian soldiers who were guarding the Tsar except for a Pavel Medvedev, a Cheka jewish spy. Yurovsky replaced the loyal-to-the-Tsar Russian soldiers with jewish communist assassins from Hungary. That they were Jewish communists from Hungary, their scribbling on the walls indicated.

Karl Marx at the time was also funded by Rothschild. From his education in France and England, Marx developed his personal Communistic ideals and wrote the Communist Manifesto, although we can estimate quite rightly that these ideas, in reality based on dictatorial rule that no one wanted, were refined for public distribution.

The following letter by Baruch Levy, to Marx, reflects Weishaupt’s dictatorial socialism in a Zionistic format:

“The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this “new world order” the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands” (from `La Revue de Paris’, p. 574, June 1, 1928.

Meanwhile the Rothschild banking family settled the first Russian jews in what was to become Israel, starting in 1880, 17 years prior to the 1st zionist convention in 1897. The Rothschilds took leading positions in the zionist movement, financed the settlements and bought a gigantic piece of land for investments. The Rothschild statue still stand in Tel Aviv and a road is named after the family.
British Lord Rothschild (leader of the British zionist movement) forwarded the Balfour Declaration to the British government which was returned to him signed. It stated that a homeland for the jews in Palestine was to be secured. A part that belonged to the Ottoman Empire. And it all happened.

After the Russian Revolution and establishment of the USSR, each Kibbutz became militarised by Russian weapons to drive the Palestinians out with militia and guerrilla tactics to expand the territory by rapid emerging new settlements, connecting them with roads like a spider web Palestinians were not allowed to use. A tactic still used today.

To no surprise the Palestine people who lived there for centuries revolted. After Israel became a reality in 1948/9, the PLO was formed as a greater revolt with Arafat as leader. The PLO was of course flagged as terrorists.

After the Russian revolution and the entire Romanov’s assassinated, all Russian state and Romanovs gold was brought to Paris and London.
The gold was split. A part for King George V and the other part for Rotschild. With this gold, they bought their direct way further into the FED which had recently come into place via partner and family Paul Warburg via the Jeckyll Island meeting.

Again in the new USSR, the state controlled creation its own money entirely, stopping spiraling inflation.

5. Stalin

stalinWhere did Stalin come from (skip this part too if you want).

Stalin was an unlawful born child as a result of quick one stance adultery sex between Ketevan ‘Keke’ Jughashvili neé Geladze (beautiful 20-year-old woman worked as a laundress for a jewish wine merchant in the Georgian city of Gori) and Maurice Ephrussi who was the 2nd biggest oil magnate in Russia and an agent for Rotschild.

All oil workers lived in the city of Baku (Caucasus oil fields).

Maurice took care of Keke and the child in secret. Stalin was given a job in one of Rotschild’s refineries where he was made a strong leader of the union.

In 1901 already, Baku delivered half the world’s oil. Stalin had great knowledge of the oil industry and his connections to the top of oil and politics were direct. The perfect puppet.

But in 1912, Eduard the Rothschild, Alphonse’s son, sold most of the Rotschild oil interests to Royal Dutch Shell. The Rothschild took most payments in the form of Shell shares.

So after the Soviets came to power the Rothschilds cashed out and left Russia. Their ex-palace is now the Azerbaijan Justice Ministry.

6. The obsessive self-indulged

Jews are to blame for all the world’s misery? That’s not what I am saying.

It’s just that vicious, cruel, ruthless and careless families like Rothschild, Morgan, Warbug, Schiff intermarried and became financially bigger than nations, except for Russia (and the Ottoman empire).

As the jewish population lived in exile, most of them homed in Germany and Russia (and Spain). Any public profession for them was forbidden, so most of them went into currency exchange and business from small to huge industrial scale. The different jewish populations throughout Europe had loose ties. But as they intermarry mostly, the whole is kept segregated.
Their commerce, lobbies and high financial domination over vast parts of Europe, Russia, and later the US, made that they had the upper hand almost everywhere, but behind the scenes.

However, there is a noticeable split into two main groups. The orthodox and secular liberals.
The last group can be majorly found in zionism. Zionists and other secular liberals have nothing with religion (judaism) whatsoever and therefore isn’t anti-Semitic. Orthodox jews oppose zionism.

In general, however, the jewish thought that either socialism or liberalism would bring them to ‘salvation’.
In other words… it doesn’t matter how. This is severely exploited by the obsessive self-indulged and explains community of Kibbutzes, the funding of the Russian Revolution as well, and support of liberal conservative directions and also those via political active faiths. But since a few years the Orthodox have come into mass demonstration against their zionist leaders which is held out of the news.

Zionism is a political segregated movement based on economic and cultural nationalism, no assimilation of others, super capitalism and without compassion of the rest. They denominate themselves as the ‘chosen people’ and think that others have less rights. They are to serve them.
All parties in Israel today carry the name ‘Zion’ in them with a few exceptions.

In the christian world almost the same happened after the reformation, especially in the UK and US. Specially the US is strongly based on protestantism from the beginning. Kennedy was the only catholic president.
In Europe, religion wasn’t a free choice. And so many went to the new continent. The Pilgrims story is famous (the reason why Americans celebrate Thanksgiving) and their bible remains at the heart of the US founding and government, specially even today.

As the US is also the land of opportunity where one could make it as a poor immigrant with modest government controls, it had set the door wide open to corruption of secular protestant and jewish secular families who are extremely obsessed greedy and addicted to power and control while being highly conservative, occupying most of high finance, top politics and top business in the US.
And is in essence, this is still the US and EU ‘landscape’ today.

It is these obsessed jewish secular liberals and their similar protestant conservative and liberal partners living by the morality to take care of yourself, your family, near community and similar thinkers. Students conforming and with compliant potential are granted scholar ships (their education is paid for).
All the rest is a threat to their way of life which they call freedom and grace. But is in fact at the profound expense of others.

These families believe that wealth belongs to them because of their brain capacity, hard work and history. And according to their morality, everything is a competition, hence a threat.
Those less erudite or with less capacity should just serve as servants and be lucky if they are granted, stay away or just die.

Since WWII we have names as well. Some never went away, some emerged.
Just some examples:

New money:
Ford, Goldman Sachs, Citi, HSBC, Coca Cola, Oppenheimer, Murdock, Sumner Redstone, Erkko (Sanoma), Walt Disney, Geffen, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Streetcorp capital, Fidelity, George Soros, Koch, etc.

Old money:
British – Belgian – Spanish – Dutch royal families, Monsanto, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, Rockefeller, Morgan (GE, and Morgan banks), Deutsche Bank, Rothschild, Bush family, Kerry, Baron Michael Grade, etc.

Anyway, those in Forbes magazine’s top.

It is this group that thinks the rest of the world is best reformed in their way and have organised themselves in many concealed platforms over time (UN, WTO, WHO, Bilderberg group, AIPAC, Trilateral Commission, Round Tables, many Lobby groups, Council on Foreign Relations, FED, ECB, BIS, IMF, Asian Development Bank, Plan of the New American Century (PNAC), Pilgrim Society, etc, etc…)
That’s how they really think (!)

These obsessive dominant families, their conforming students and offspring take revolving seats in transatlantic political high offices, institutions linked to banks and commerce (usually as non-executives, council members, governors or investors).
Finance of countries, business and wars depended on them, thus governments, their institutions and media.

It has formed the liberal jewish-christian tradition of modelling the western society by growth-economy in which we live today with the US Dollar as world reserve and trade fiat-currency. Anti-Russia, anti-islam have deeply rooted in those high networks as well, and everything standing is in their way is a radical or even a terrorist.

In Russia, the situation was totally different again. Russia is Orthodox Christian and Tsar Nicolas kept those greedy obsessive powers under control. The Romanovs were the world’s richest.

7. USSR

Archive_Miscellaneous_Znamya_the_USSR_033405_The ruthless capital families wanting to bigger than states cashed out, were nearly gone, or were left with a near dismantled network.

This communist era came out of the Russian revolution with Stalin as Chairman after the their first Chairman elected Lenin died in 1924.

All Russian finance became under control of the Ministry of Finance, called ‘Narkomfin’.

What happened in April 1920 quite quickly was the total destruction of the Baku (Caucasus) oil fields. While the Rotschilds were gone, their partners Nobel brothers were still in operation, but all oil fields were destroyed is a massive raid with hundreds of thousands massacred.

For the Rockefeller and Rotshchilds this was great. Although Rotschild and Nobel had build the first oil tankers from Baku, the plan was that global oil prices would go up high after Bakus’s destruction.
Rockefeller and Rotschild had carved up the market.
As Rotschild-Schiff had financed the Russian revolution and got half of the Romanovs gold, as an extra, they were well compensated for the loss of their Nobel partners in which they still had a stake.

Oil exploitation of the Caucasus now came in the hands of the Soviets with strong reduced capacity but enough and against much higher global price. And this is exactly what Rockefeller, BP, Rotschild and Shell wanted, plus they had been well compensated as an extra on top of their gold seizure.

By November 1921 the State Bank (Gosbank) had the single right to handle foreign currency and valuables. It also set the official price of precious metals and exchange rate, regulating private trade in gold, silver and foreign currency on stock exchanges and cheques and bills of exchange drawn in foreign currency, which were permitted in 1922.

Two re-denominations conducted in 1922 and 1923 increased the value of Soviet paper money. During the 1st round the New Ruble of 1922 exchanged for 10,000 rubles of all that was in circulation in the country. During the 2nd round the New Ruble of 1923 exchanged for 100 rubles of the 1922 issue.

On October 11, 1922, the State Bank was granted the right to issue the chervonets (banknote backed by gold) and became the issuing centre. The chervonets ended spiraling post-war inflation.

It was however impossible to industrialise the USSR by traditional means. The public hardly had cash and savings. Loans abroad weren’t possible due to political reasons and several crises and crashes in the capital world before WWI, and mammoth debt obligations as a result of WWI.
Therefore the first commercial banks appeared in 1920 in Russia. They were strictly for short-term loans for commerce and individuals. Only the state issued Rubles and banknotes and handled long-term loans (investments).

Fierce internal struggles happened after Lenin had died. In the end Trotsky was expelled from the USSR in October 1927 due to vigorous united opposition and demonstrations, but by no way the Soviets would let the western capital jewish banking families return and between 1920 and 1930 the financial regulations reformed and even tightened.

Commercial banking was abolished in 1930 completely and the state took over short-term lending.

The state did its best to issue enough to make the planned economy and its growth possible by the most possible simple means. So, no complex financial products. The state issued money very tightly controlled and based on the gold standard.

The New Ruble and chervonets were backed by gold to a certain amount of grams.

In February 1930 all transactions to sell gold and foreign currency to private individuals for chervonets at a fixed rate were banned, the Soviet currency was withdrawn from foreign exchanges and a quoting commission was set up under the State Bank’s Board to set the exchange rates of foreign currencies.

In May 1932 the functions of the State Bank and those of the long-term investment banks (Prombank, Selkhozbank, Vsekobank and Tsekombank) were finally delineated.

8. WWII and post War USSR (don’t skip this)

Post-WWII- Map of Soviet spheres of -influence-Under Stalin millions of people either died in the war, the result of it, or were deported. Which is a human catastrophe and history will never forgive him, however this blog is about the financial system.

The USSR financial structure remained under full state control since its foundation. Founding the USSR was the goal of the Russian Revolution in 1917. Exports of rubles was prohibited since then, and the Russian state bank (Gosbank) issued just enough to do the central economic planning.

WWII for the USSR was financed by issuing state money by fourfold. No loans were needed.

The cold war started soon after WWII, in the end resulting in Vietnam which finished in 1975.
The reason was that the USSR supported Cuba, Mongolia and Vietnam economically.

Export of rubles was illegal, so this aid was done by credit against hard currency (gold).
Russian credit was interest free. This raged the western heavy politicised banking elite who were (and still are) essentially all over in high western government positions. Kennedy was well aware of this, but he had little choice than to follow. And the nuclear race and competition to the moon began.

In a speech Kennedy was open about conspiracy bigger than the US, partly referring to the deceitful founding of the FED which made the US totally depend on ever growing forced upon debt with interest, and partly referring to those dominant power elite who basically ran the world behind the curtains.
And for a while he issued debt free US notes as alternative of the mandatory fiat lending dollar at interest by the FED causing ever growing debt.
Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 and issuing of US notes ended.

The role of foreign trade of goods In the USSR was minor, less than 1%. The East block wanted self-sustainability. This was possible as Russia is big enough with all natural earth’s resources on its own soil.
Foreign trade quota were controlled by Moscow. Gold or goods were used for the limited trade outside the East block. E.g. Russia would deliver steel to Fiat. In return Fiat gave Russia the tooling and parts to produce their own variant of Fiat models (Lada).
Also US industry did business. Sometimes the USSR needed American grain when crops had failed and vice versa. For this, the USSR had to lend dollars with interest…

Where did the US had to get their money… more lending with interest from the FED as they did since 1913… which are private bankers from the start… the same in fact who were behind WWI, the Russian revolution, the Wallstreet crash of 1929 and WWII.

Because of the mammoth cost of the cold war (Vietnam and the race to the moon), in 1971 Nixon found his nation in spiraled debt. He had to let go the gold standard. Auditing the FED wasn’t possible. No one was allowed into the vaults. And for certain, almost all gold was sold to finance the cold war and Vietnam. The value of the dollar plummeted.

But the cold war had cost the USSR as well. The ruble was still backed by gold, but also Russia had to pay a heavy price. Russian gold reserves had sunk to an all time low. The cold war also had drained Russia’s satellite countries such as Hungary, DDR, etc.
The Hungarian revolution was a result as people suffered financially and we very frustrated.

But also the US and Europe were in deep economic crisis after 1973. In Britain it was the same.

The reasons were twofold.

One,
the American industrialists and Wallstreet supported Japan. In short time, Japan’s image of inferior failing products became good, smart and very economic.
Europe and the US were flooded with these products and complete traditional European industries collapsed such as ship building, and the car industry contracted. Specially in Britain it almost vanished.
Coal industry vanished in Britain and Europe. Cheap US coax flooded these markets.

Of course who did benefit from it… During the Japan-Russian war, Rotschild-Schiff already had supported Japan, and this time it was no different for the transatlantic bankers and industrialists who were still in place. They made Japan (and crashed it in the 90s).

Second,
the oil embargo of 1973 where the Arab OAPAC proclaimed the oil block as a response to the pro-Israel support by the US in the Arab-Israel war. In that war Sadat of Egypt and Assad of Syria lead the Arab world to again wipe Israel away since it was proclaimed by deceitful corrupt nature.
The story of how Israel truly came about isn’t exactly all that well against the original inhabitants, and certainly isn’t anything we learned in college or from the media. In fact it is one of militant aggression, segregation and cruel expansion. And it is no wonder the Arabs were/are furious.
During Assad’s and Saddat’s campaign, Egypt had crossed the Suez Canal. The US came into action as Israel itself and that Canal is an investment of the Rothschild as well.
And their business with Shell, British OPAC (now BP) and Rockefeller’s met Exxon, Chevron and Mobil had build up all decisive oligopolies with all investments and clientele such as Winston Churchill, before the Arab countries had proclaimed independence after WWII, then nationalising all of their investments (oil industry).
Moscow replied by pausing its correspondence with Nixon and not take any action. Brezhnev said that ‘the US acted too nervous and seemed so easily frightened. We will not unleash a 3rd world war’.

The Middle East is a story of its own, profoundly explained here:
Puinhopen van het Arabisch Westen (~15,000 words, Dutch).

Again you’ll come across the same heavy politicised corrupted industrial names who completely had divided and segregated the century old quiet living of the Arabs within the Ottoman empire… for oil… And establish totally unnatural borders after WWI by use of their top political network (Sykes-Picot) and by leading and financing the zionist movement to establish Israel, also via corruption (Balfour Declaration).

In 1975 again an oil crisis began. OPEC simply wanted a better price. Oil that time was sold very cheap. So they started to limit transport.

petrodollar2-290x290Very viciously, Kissinger (a protégé of Rockefeller and also member of the Bilderberg group) established the petrodollar in 1975, agreed with Saudi Arabia and OPEC to stop the US dollar from falling and oil prices going up. It was agreed now that all international trade was to be done by the dollar.

(Kissinger worked for the Rockefellers prior to his political career and studied on their costs.)

The petrodollar was the Trojan horse as well to bring down the East block.
But it also meant that the entire world would now depend on it.

It is since then that the dollar gets it value by expansion of international trade (thus more debt) since gold backing was ended in 1971. If the market for dollars (thus trade, thus debt) does not expand, it falls and brings the entire financial system down. Since then… extra more growth by expansion/debt, one way or another, is a must.

During the 70s and 80s the USSR depended heavily on various fuel exports. Partly, it was a way to pay its first ever national debt, but the USSR was also considered to be an extreme reliable supplier of oil and gas.
The petrodollar also meant that there was to be no alternative than to receive dollars for Russian gas, oil and other products (as western gold was mainly gone).
The East block became depending on the fiat dollar in steps, which is a debt with interest system and became without hard backing on top of that.

Now in the first time of hundreds of years of history, Russia became depended on the Rotschild banking system… but without any hard currency behind it (gold).

As Russia now also ran into financial problems, countries like the DDR (and other USSR satellite countries) found themselves in difficulties to finance backed by Russia . The DDR needed money and had no alternative than lending it from the west, based on the petrodollar to keep the economy going, at interest of course. However, how could it back that up… It couldn’t and the DDR went bankrupt

Technological developments were reasonably on par with Europe and the US in the 50s and 60s.
From 1970 onwards, industrial development and science in the East block started to lag behind. There simply was shortage of East block investment capital as a result of the cold war and by the peg to the fiat-petrodollar (growing debt with interest without hard backing).
Although the East block was oppressive, people very much became frustrated by the growing difference compared to the west.

The world was tumultuous but with both the USSR and Western economy down, Raegan and Thatcher came to tandem-power as conservative neoliberals when the 80s began. From Raegan it is clearly known that he too came to power via the Bilderberg group financing and media network. What were they up to now again.

Both Britain and the US were economically in shatters by the cold war, Vietnam and by the big oil crises in the 70s. And American capitalisation of Japan flooded both continents with products they could not complete with.
Europe’s rebuild was near complete as well. The US had profited highly from that to-rebuild-market. In fact, that was the deal behind the Marshal Plan and willingness to help Europe to dismantle Germany’s occupation. But Europe was stagnated in the 70s and 80s, so European business for the US halted as well.
Corrupting South-America with dollars and control over their resources had come to an end as well. In fact it would contract.

Mainly because of severe shortage of capital, the mechanisation, science and product development in the USSR fell behind. This resulted in ever more failing of grain crops and thus the USSR had to lend more dollars to import goods and grain. Exporting goods to keep the financial balance didn’t work since Russian products had become inferior due to the grown lack of capital, thus investments. And export of oil and gas alone wasn´t enough.

The western banking elite obliged happily to lend since there was no room for other western expansion which the petrodollar needed. It meant huge profits again for them.

The nuclear disaster of Chernobyl in 1987 was the last straw, illustrating the collapse of the USSR.

9. The new Russia, the Dollar-Ruble

debtDuring the 80s, Gorbachev came to power. He was simply confronted with the financial situation of the USSR and frustrated people such as in the DDR. Shortly after the wall fell, I’ve been there and what I noticed was a totally rotten, fallen and ruined infrastructure in East Berlin. Almost everything was heavily smogged, untidy and broken.

Today I understand why… All currency was drained and the East had nothing to offer anymore to exchange since most gold went to the west because of spiraled debt pegged to the US dollar.

It made investments impossible as the USSR simply was bankrupt not able to develop anything.

After the Berlin wall fell in 1989, on 29 May 1990 Boris Yeltsin was elected chairman of the new Russian Supreme Soviet. On 12 June 1991 he was elected by popular vote to the newly created post of President of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), at that time one of the 15 constituent republics of the Soviet Union.

The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) was founded, July 13, 1990.
During this break-up of the USSR, regional currencies emerged.
Tumultuous times, but Russia kept the Ruble.

Russia faced the fact that it was totally bankrupt and was depending on the US dollar now.
It was forced to lend at the IMF, which is (of course) under control of Rotschild capital.

The CBR is owned by ‘The city of London’ and takes it orders from London and Washington.
This is not London as a community and city, but the financial district of London, called ‘The City’.
By Washington I mean, the government. But all staff there and many government officials in the US (check it yourself) are Wallstreet sharks since the FED exists.

Russia may not print money itself. The CBR depends totally on the US dollar, and takes orders from the Bank of England, IMF, FED and the American government.

This is how creation of new Rubles goes:

Russian private businesses and Russia itself (e.g. Gazprom) receive dollars by foreign trade.
The CBR then buys all the dollars received and brings the equivalent of new rubles into circulation.
The CBR is also forced to buy worthless US government bonds which are in the hands of the western commercial banks in order to lend money at interest to the US government (but had become worthless). The FED also buys some of those, but defers them to the CBR.

So basically new dollars come into existence while destructing people’s wealth… But that’s not new since the FED… Just this time Russia has been schemed into it…

10. Russia’s fight for financial sovereignty

When Putin was elected in 2000, he faced Russia bankrupt and completely hijacked by the financial western elite. The nation owed $16.6 billion to the IMF, which is basically under the regime of Rotschild. Russian foreign debt to the Rothschild-controlled Paris & London ‘Club Of Creditors’ was over 36 billion dollars.

1101071231_400Putin took advantage of the boom in world oil prices by redirecting a portion of the profits of Russia’s largest oil and gas producer Gazprom so as to pay off the country’s debt. The continual surge in oil prices and Russia’s direct contracts with Iran and Syria (historic oil and gas rich neighbours near the Caucasus) made that the Caucasus and the Middle East rule provide world with oil and specially natural gas.
Europe became largely depend on Gazprom.

It all greatly accelerated Russia’s capacity to restore financial sovereignty.

The fight in Afghanistan is nothing else than the creation of the first western independent gas pipeline as it was the first thing to secure when NATO arrived. And Iraq was a false flag.
The Taliban had abandoned the western deal, but the west wants it pipe.

The same goes for the a line over Syria which British engineers started to build from Qatar over all the pro-west Arab nations via Saudi Arabia to Turkey. Just pro-Russia Syria was in the way. Assad didn’t approve but the engineers continued building. This was late 2009.
Another crucial line goes from Egypt over Syria to the Caucasus bypassing Israel.
The Arab spring in 2010?
All tumult and rebelling started exactly where those lines run, which is no coincidence.

By 2006 Putin had paid off Russia’s debt. Russia’s financial dependence on the Rotschild-mafia financiers was now over. Putin could then establish what became his Russian Unity Party’s campaign slogan: ‘Putin’s Plan Means Victory For Russia! ‘

This slogan continues to make the western politicised banking elite very nervous…

In Dec. 2007 Putin was the Person of the Year in Times Magazine.
Soon after he and Russia are being portrait as bad continuously.

The CBR system has not changed yet, but now all debt is paid is back.

The establishment of BRICs and its AIIB (alternative to World Bank) is the next step and well underway. The BRICs countries are motivated to unwrap their dependence on the fiat-petrodollar, FED, World Bank and IMF.
Explained here: Oekraine en Massa Bedrog (Dutch).

But after MH17 and the fast boycott of the west, the inflow of dollars of course plummeted which made the Ruble’s value fall by 39%.

So apparently… this was part of the plan too… To disrupt Russia financial sovereignty and force it back under Rotschild debt control.

Putin wants nothing to do with that and has stated on December 15 2014 that the CBR will become a state bank again. He has even filed an international arrest against the Rotschild family, as a symbol.
As a direct result, Dec. 15, 2014, all traders were messaged to be aware that the USD/RUB pair will be discontinued further and are requested not to open new USD/RUB positions.

The CBR has become the main share holder too again of the Sberbank of Russia. Founded in 1841,
it’s the oldest people’s savings bank in Russia providing short-mid-term loans and exchange for small business people’s use.

It was under state control during both rulings of the Tsar and USSR.

After the US/EU coup d’état over Ukraine, boycotting the Sberbank was promoted by the new US/EU-Ukraine puppet government.

So basically Putin has disconnected short-mid-term low risk exchange and lending for the people and smaller commerce from high risk commercial and state bulk investment lending which is (still) pegged to the dollar and under direct regime of Rotshchild-banking. And he made a 1st step to disconnect the exclusive money issuing by the fraudulent common mandatory debt according to the same Rotschild system.

The 1st disconnection existed on mainland Europe just not too long ago (before 2006) which has brought Europe the highest living standard in the world. This entanglement has been proposed already several times after the financial crash of 2007/8. But as all banks in the west are now in the hands of few big private commercial financial barons with exclusive right to issue electronic currency (debt), they have refused, aka lobby strong against it from the highest top (BIS and Trilateral Commission), so will never pass any government or EU. It evens needs breaking up treaties and guidelines.

It would be a step forward indeed, but as long as common electronic currency can be created exclusively by private privileged entities from nearly nothing and backed by nothing, inflated massively by nothing for mandatory common lending/debt at interest (they control and manipulate) on top of it,
we and entire nations remain hijacked…;

we will remain living in a down-spiral of ever less money available, ever more fiercely compete against each other for less cash, burn out ever more, live from disaster to disaster, from crises to crises and from war to war, hence extra spiraled debt for militarism.
And in the process we clearly notice common wealth flowing to the top of the financial pyramid accelerated since 2006, as common services and securities are destroyed…;

at the high expensive of we the people.

There… we have it. Russia is ‘fighting’ hard for its financial sovereignty.

Advertenties

CRASHEN EN NIETS GELEERD

__
__
learn-nothing-dayDe labiele basis van de financiële wereld is zichtbaar geworden met de val van Lehman Brothers in september 2008. Het kaartenhuis van snel geld is in elkaar gestort
met een slopend domino-effect. Het geldsysteem is een monsterlijke bron van wereldellende: corruptie, fraude, misleiding, verduistering en destructie van landen door vernietigende regels, akkoorden en verdragen.
Fundamentele omvorming is indringend noodzakelijk…

Is na vijf jaar iets veranderd… is iets geleerd…?

Het fundament van alle ellende: wurgkapitalisme

1.  Uit de hand gelopen handel in derivaten zoals credit default swaps (cds).

2.  Verdrag van Lissabon dat Landen, Centrale Banken, de ECB verbiedt zelf direct geld aan te
___maken en te reguleren. Dit moet exclusief worden overgelaten aan commerciële banken
___(het verdrag is dezelfde tekst als de door het publiek afgewezen Europese grondwet).

3.  Bazelakkoorden waarin is geregeld dat banken vrijwel geen eigen kapitaal ‘in kas’ hoeven
___aan te houden als het gaat om investeren/gokken met zgn. tier1-kapitaal (bestemd voor
___staatsleningen, hypotheken en pensioenfondsen).

4.  Ongereguleerde Hedgefunds en Private Equities.

5.  Transatlantische driehoeks-machtsverhoudingen, lobbyclubs en corruptie.

Toelichting

Nog altijd mogen investeringsbanken en pensioenfondsen met minimaal eigen vermogen een relatief ‘klein’ kapitaal, bijvoorbeeld 1 miljard, laten verzekeren voor de waarde van 100 door middel van credit defauls swaps (cds). Verzekeringsbanken geven ze uit. Banken als AIG, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, Citi, Deutsche Bank hebben zo’n verzekeringstak.

De Swap markt is DE oorzaak was van alle ellende. Freddie en Fannie vielen, daarna AIG en Lehman Brothers als eerste dominostenen. In 2010 werd de Swap markt gereguleerd door de regering Obama. De banken veranderden de productnaam in Swap Future en het spel gaat gewoon ongecontroleerd door, De EU heeft geen maatregelen genomen en kondigt ze ook niet aan.

Verzekeringsbanken vallen eveneens onder de Bazel-akkoorden dus volstaat ook voor hen slechts een gering eigen vermogen, terwijl ze toch voor kapitalen aan waarde mogen verzekeren die ze zelf niet hebben. Zij dekken zich een beetje in via de Hedgefunds en Private Equities. Deze laatsten vallen niet onder Bazel-akkoorden en hebben ook geen rating nodig. Het zijn de echte cowboys en zwarte schapen van de financiële markten.

De volle 100 mogen de commerciële banken en pensioenfondsen in elk geval gebruiken om staatsobligaties kopen cq. schuld verkopen voor de waarde van 100.
Of ze mogen met deze constructie grote vastgoedprojecten financieren of een verzameling aan hypotheken verkopen en doorverkopen. Zo’n verzameling heet CDO (Collateral Debt Obligation).

Landen zijn nog altijd volledig afhankelijk van commerciële banken en daarmee ook van de rating agencies. Regeringen gaan zo nog altijd direct voor het volle pond verder in de schuld tegen hoge rente, te betalen uit belastinggeld.
Het publiek gaat dus per definitie nog altijd dieper de schuld in en betaalt altijd (coupon)rente (uw geld) over eigendom dat de bank niet eens had. En van die rente betaalt de investeringsbank of pensioenfonds slechts een kleine premie aan de verzekeringsbank die een beetje gedekt worden door de Hedgefunds and Private Equities.

Hedgefunds and Private Equities kopen vooral staatseigendommen op voor weinig, omdat ze onder dwang van het IMF snel moeten worden verkocht… en een land met weinig eigen inkomstenbronnen komt vanzelf in de problemen…

Het blijft wurgkapitalisme pur sang. Immers, alleen de commerciële banken is het op basis van het verdrag van Lissabon exclusief toegestaan geld aan te maken en-of te reguleren, waardoor landen gedwongen zijn aangewezen op een excessief schuldensysteem (met rente) van de commerciële financiële markten om aan geld te komen. Ze moeten daardoor blijvend keihard bezuinigen. Een andere keuze is gewoonweg niet (meer) mogelijk.

Ondanks dat het publiek nog altijd anders schijnt te denken, de centrale banken, ECB en FED brengen dus zelf daadwerkelijk geen geld meer in omloop en kan het zeer beperkt reguleren. Belastinggeld gaat vrijwel volledig op aan betaling van (coupon)rente aan de commerciële banken.
Geld voor rente kan sowieso alleen in omloop komen door middel van méér schuld aangezien ‘rente’ als geld ten prinpale nooit wordt aangemaakt bij schuldverkoop.
(Wie nog mocht denken dat geld wordt gedekt door goud… dat is al sinds 1971 niet meer zo…)

De investerings- en verzekeringsbanken worden schathemelrijk van niets, terwijl regeringen rente moeten voldoen uit belastinggeld en niets anders kunnen doen dan méér lenen én permanent bezuinigen. Daardoor komt er een moment dat staatseigendommen onder dwang moeten worden verkocht… Hedgefunds en Private Equities kopen ze op tegen lage waarde en verkopen ze duur door.
En het spel begint weer van voren af aan… Een volgend land zal ten prooi vallen.

Wat moet veranderen

1.  Handel in derivate financiële producten verbieden, of tenminste sterk inperken.

2.  Kapitaaleisen van banken aanzienlijk verhogen en het verdrag van Lissabon aanpassen.

3.  Hedgefunds en Private Equities reguleren.

4.  Grotere invloed van China waar kapitaal-aanmaak en -regulering volledig direct onder controle is.

5.  Invloed van machtige lobby’s zoals de Trilateral Commission en de BIS inperken en de vele
___draaideurfuncties aan de top van internationale banken, multinationals 
en overheden uitbannen…
___Corruptie moet ingeperkt worden.

Derivate financiële producten verbieden, inperken

Het kabinet VVD/PvdA Rutte-Asscher heeft het onderwerp: Hervorming financieel stelsel.

Hier lezen we: “Verbod op speculatie met publieke gelden. Het kabinet-Rutte-Asscher wil verbieden
dat organisaties die (mede) met publiek geld zijn 
gefinancierd, speculeren met complexe financiële producten zoals derivaten. Verzekeren tegen renterisico’s is wel toegestaan. Toezicht hierop vindt plaats bij de jaarlijkse accountantscontrole.”

Klinkt leuk, maar het verbiedt slechts overheids- en semi-overheidsorganisaties gebruik te maken van
credit default swaps… 
De commerciële banken en Pensioenfondsen vallen er niet onder…

Politici spreken nog altijd in dezelfde termen van ‘garanties’ en ‘uitleencapaciteit’ Dit zijn letterlijk financiële synoniemen voor bovenstaande cds-constructie, dus een klein bedrag laten verzekeren voor 100 en die 100 uitlenen tegen rente zonder onderpand. In financiële termen heet die
100 inderdaad ‘uitleencapaciteit’, of ‘garanties’. Dus ‘what’s new…’

En nóg erger, VVD/PvdA kabinet Rutte-Asscher wil dat pensioenfondsen in Nederland investeren via slimme financiële constructies. Mensen zouden van hun stoel moeten vallen toen ze dat hoorden uit monde van Diederik Samson. Het is immers exact hét synoniem voor de toepassing van de Swap waar verzekeringsbanken (verzekeringen) in dat spel voor nodig zijn. En inderdaad, het kabinet is in gesprek met investerings- en verzekeraars, zo meldde Henk Kamp in de media.
De PvdA zou de financiële sector hervormen? Welnee, ze doen er helemaal aan mee.

Sterker, het kabinet verdiept in derivate producten zoals de swap markt met onze pensioenen.
In sept 2013 werd de rekenrente voor pensioenfondsen gebaseerd op de ‘Ultimate forward rate’.
Ingewikkeld, maar het is gebaseerd op de lange termijnrente van de swap markt. De rekenrente beïnvloedt de dekkingsgraad sterk. Ook al barsten pensioenpotten uit hun voegen van het geld, de rekenmethode bepaalt of de fondsen moeten korten of niet. Hoe krommer kan het zijn.
Het is beter dan de rekenrente op basis van de marktrente, maar vóór 2006 was de rekenrente vast, namelijk de wettelijke rekenrente van 4%. Er was nooit een vuiltje aan de lucht.

Schrale troost: op het moment van schrijven is de wettelijke rente 3,0%, de ‘Ultimate forward rate’ 3,3%.
Maar door de pensioenen op te hangen aan de swap markt, betekent dus overduidelijk dat het kabinet niet van plan is de derivate handel aan de kaak te stellen. Zeer zeer krom omdat juist de Swaps aan de basis staan van alle ellende.

In juli 2010 stelde de regering Obama de ‘Dodd–Frank Wallstreet Reform and Consumer Protection Act’ in werking ter controle van de Swap markt via de SEC. Banken veranderden de productnaam in Swap Future en het spel gaat ongecontroleerd door, De EU heeft geen maatregelen genomen en kondigt ze ook niet aan. Dijsselbloem hoor je er niet over, Rutte hoor je er niet over.

En hieruit blijkt wederom wel weer dat politici geen invloed hebben op de werking van de financiële sector. Ze moeten mee in een piramidesysteem, opgezet door enkele wereldwijde kapitale families zoals Rothschild en Morgan waarin de gehele Westerse wereld is gevangen.

Politici zijn ‘Puppets’ en de oude media hun spreekbuis.

Er is totaal niets veranderd met derivate financiële producten, en politici zijn slechts uitvoerders.

Kapitaaleisen van banken aanzienlijk verhogen en Lissabonverdrag aanpassen

De Westerse internationale bancaire regels worden gemaakt door de BCBS, een commissie binnen de Bank Of International Settlements (BIS) gezeteld in Zwitserland onder bankgeheim. Het is een illuster niet gouvernementele organisatie en kan niet publiek verantwoordelijk worden gehouden.
De BCBS heeft de Bazel-akkoorden geschreven.

De akkoorden worden altijd overgenomen door de EU en VS in wetgeving (EU-richtlijnen en -verdragen), omdat centrale bankiers, ECB en FED in de BIS en BCBS zitten met private partijen. Absurd.
De centrale bankiers per land worden benoemd door hun min. v. financiën, premier of president.
Leden van private partijen kwamen o.m. uit het Rothschil bankiers imperium, de machtigste wereldwijde triljonaire bankiersfamilie. Het huidige systeem van geld = schuld met hoge rente is hun uitvinding.
Een andere private partij was o.m. JP Morgan, de grootste en machtigste Amerikaanse investeerder/- bank en uitvinder van de credit default swap. Hij bracht dit financiële product in de BIS.
De private invloed vandaag is ongeveer 14%, o.m. via de prominente FED dat eigendom is van de Bank of New York, JP Morgan Chase (Rockefeller, JP Morgan), Deutsche Bank, Wells Fargo, Citigroup (Blackstone Group, The Vanguard Group, Fidelity Investments, State Street Global Investors en Capital Research and Management),
Belangenverstrengelingen in optima forma…

Er zijn drie Bazel-akkoorden, maar Bazel II heeft alle ellende geaccelereerd. Het regelt dat alle banken vrijwel geen eigen vermogen hoeven te hebben voor leningen ten aanzien van vastgoed, staatsschuld (staatsobligaties) en pensioenfondsen, zogenaamd tier1-kapitaal.
Voila, en zie dat juist deze drie zaken in grote problemen zijn gekomen waarvoor de burger altijd zal moeten bloeden.

Risico voor tier1-kapitaal wordt gedragen door vreemd vermogen en mag monsterlijk in waarde worden gemultipliceerd door middel van credit default swaps, zonder dat er genoeg geld tegenover ligt. Daardoor werden, in combinatie met het verdrag van Lissabon, ontstellend snel schulden opgeblazen aan kleine en grote overheden tegen hoge rente… op basis van ‘lucht’. Ook hebben ze met de truuk van de CDS Griekenland geadviseerd hun staatsschuld te verduisteren. Het heeft ook geleid tot de vele lege kantoren, veel te hoge huizenwaarde, te hoge staatsschulden en dwingt tot permanente bezuinigingen.

Is de minimum tier1-kapitaaleis in Bazel II voor de banken 0-2%. In Bazel III is dat tenminste 7%.
De EU heeft dit akkoord aangenomen in de vorm van wetgeving, EU-richtlijn CRD-IV.
Bazel III/CRD-IV is per 1 januari 2013 ingegaan. Banken moeten er per 2019 volledig aan voldoen.
Een kapitaaleis van 7% blijft een lachertje, en zeker zolang de constructie van de cds blijft toegestaan.

Komt er een (eventueel beperkend) verbod op Swaps…?
Neen, dat is niet opgenomen in de akkoorden, en komt er nog altijd niet.

Is het verdrag van Lissabon gewijzigd…?
Neen, het is andere naam voor ‘Europese grondwet’ die in 2007 werd doorgedrukt na publieke afwijzing.
Een verandering zit er niet aan te komen.

Zit er een gewijzigd Basel-akkoord aan te komen vanuit de BCBS…?
Nee, dat zit er niet aan te komen alsook niet een gewijzigde EU-richtlijn CRD-IV.

Maar in de VS gaat het toch beter?
De VS functioneert nu op basis Bazel II… Gevolg… een enorme schulden-stapeling is gaande op basis van Swaps op weinig eigen vermogen. De opleving zal van korte duur zijn en een volgende crash zal plaatsvinden tijdens het volgende presidentschap.

En het rapport Wijffels dan…?
Hoewel er nog hoop was, blijkt het flinterdun te zijn. Na een vliegtuig- of treincrash zijn aanbevelingen voor permanente maatregelen aanzienlijk en dik, maar kennelijk niet als de gehele Westerse wereld crasht vanwege een destructief financieel systeem dat alles ontregelt.
De commissie Wijffels rapporteert totaal geen fundamentele wijzigingen, terwijl hij internationaal een machtig man is. Hij komt van de Rabobank, was voorzitter van de SER en bewindsvoerder bij de Wereldbank… En hij kent de wereldtop, gouvernementeel, zakelijke netwerken en de superlobby’s.
Wijffels speelt juist de banken in de kaart. Hij vindt dat kapitaalbuffers hoger moeten… met publiek kapitaal, dus belastinggeld.
Helemaal niets is te vinden over inperking van derivate financiële producten (o.m. de cds), terwijl deze
en masse de bubble en crash hebben veroorzaakt.

De consument moet straks o.m. 20% eigen geld inleggen voor een huis… de bank maar 7%…

Grotere invloed van China

Dit lijkt raar te klinken. We zijn immers kritisch over de algehele moraal in China, en het is geen democratie wat uiteraard niet okay is. Vanuit geld-perspectief is het echter een feit dat de Chinese overheid zelf geld aanmaakt en de omvang, waarde en sterkte van dat kapitaal zelf strak reguleert. Niet private commerciële financiële instituten zoals exclusief in het Westen.

In het westen is handel in staatsschulden op basis van Swaps een alleenrecht van commerciële banken (de markt). Het is de fundamentele oorzaak van de westerse crash. China kent zulke constructies en handel niet met hun staatsobligaties, of zéér strak gemonitord. Pas op 6 sept. 2013 heropende China de ‘future’ exchange’ voor de Chinese staatsobligaties na deze handel in de ban gedaan te hebben vanaf 1995 na één schandaal. De Chinese overheid regisseert dus zelf strak en direct en laat dat niet over aan allesoverheersende private schaduwpartijen zoals de Trilateral Commission en de BIS.

Zonder enige uitzondering kent dit land uitsluitend verbetering van levensomstandigheden en economische groei van ca. 9%. Soms wat meer, soms wat minder. Er is inflatie, maar per definitie minder dan toenemende bestedingskracht. De Chinese koopkracht neemt decennialang alleen maar zeer beheerst toe met een constante economische groei van om en nabij de 9%.

De Chinese centrale bank, People’s Bank of China creëert zelf geld, bewaakt strak de hoeveelheid in roulatie, en hanteert een minimum kapitaaleis van 20%. China delft daarbij zelf het meeste goud in de wereld. Stilzwijgend wordt goud als ‘cover’ voor hun munt, de Yuan, steeds verder uitgebouwd. 

Bovendien is de Oosterse cultuur sterk gebaseerd op Confucius. Het zit er diep in. Het is een leer waarbij ‘samen’, sterke sociale cohesie  en maatschappelijk belang centraal staan. Chinese zaken passen om die reden ook veel beter bij de Afrikaanse moraal.

Corruptie

Belangenverstrengelingen tussen multinationals, internationale banken en leiders in dienst van de overheid aan de supertop zijn enorm. Ze verwisselen gemakkelijk van stoel en zelfs van politieke partij voor macht. Voor overheidsfuncties verlaten ze tijdelijk de lobbyclubs.
Vanwege de Europese-Amerikaanse transatlantische historie is dat in de VS niet anders. De basisas bestaat uit elite topnetwerken afkomsting van Duitsland, Nederland, België, Frankrijk, GB, VS en Zwitserland.
Alle Secretaries of Treasury (minister van financiën) komen 
van Wallstreet, van JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi, ongeacht politieke richting.
Zij financieren campagnes voor beide presidentiële kandidaten. Onder Bush was de grootste Wallstreet-haai Henry Paulson minister van financiën. Hij was CEO bij Goldman Sachs van 2002-2006; de meeste gevreesde, beruchte man van Wallstreet. Onder Obama werd het Timothy Geithner, lid van de Trilateral Commission (TLC). Hij kwam van de FED-NY en JP Morgan (de grootste bank van de VS eveneens totaal verweven met politiek). Zij opvolger Jack Lew werkte aanvankelijk in het Witte Huis, daarna als private advocaat, vervolgens werd hij speciale assistent voor Clinton, daarna COO bij Citigroup.
Bij alle voorgaande presidenten treffen we dezelfde patronen aan.

Voor details raad ik dit artikel aan: De Elite, de Puppets en de Muppets.

Romney’s campagne werd direct gefinancierd door JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse en
Bank of America.
Obama’s financiering verliep via The Economist, University of California, Harvard, Google en Microsoft.
Lynn Forrester de Rothschild is eigenaar van The Economist group, een Rothschild…
Aan het hoofd van de University of California staat Mark Yudof, een Joodse professor die hoofdzakelijk gefinancieerd wordt door David Geffen, ook weer een Joodse miljonaire zakenman en eigenaar van Dreamworks met Steven Spielberg als director. Geffens’s bankier is JP Morgan. Geffen haalde 1,3 miljoen op voor Obama’s campagne. De stroom geld verliep via 100 miljoen donatie aan de Universiteit van Yudof. Harvard’s financiering en investeringen verlopen via Bank of America, een beruchte corrupte en foute bank die o.m. studenten snel de schulden induwt via Harvard credit banking en bijvoorbeeld ook zomaar 70 dollar kosten rekent voor transacties.

Google werd in 2008 verbonden aan Frank Quattrone, een controversiële, corrupte investeerder en adviseur verbonden aan Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank en Credit Suisse. In 2008 vonden opeens enorme donaties plaats via Google aan Obama’s campagne.
Microsoft staat los van machtige internationale bankiers. Bill Gates richtte Cascade Investments LLC al in 1984 op. Maar op zijn methodes is veel kritiek, o.m. omdat hij juist armoede in stand houdt. Gates’ filantropie bewerkstelligt juist het omgekeerde dan wordt vermoed.

Tekenen op het gebied van corruptie veranderingen af? Totaal niet.

Sterker, internationale private, bancaire en politieke belangenverstrengelingen aan de supertop komen nog altijd samen in de beruchte en illustere Trilateral Commission (TLC), het IMF, The Round Table, Club van Rome, Wereldbank, VN….
De TLC adviseert nu China om te vormen naar het Westers wurg-kapitalisme… alsof niets geleerd is…
Nout Wellink is governor binnen het IMF en vertelde in 2012 in de media dat hij China adviseert. Leden van de TLC mogen nooit openlijk bekennen lid te zijn. Wellink doet dit in de media altijd af dat hij behoort tot een club internationale adviseurs, en hij eist dat bepaalde vragen niet gesteld worden.
De TLC werd opgericht door David Rockefeller. Onder de leden bevinden zich o.a. leidinggevenden uit
de zakenwereld, politici van alle grote partijen, academici en vakbondsleiders. 
Leden die een functie uitoefenen bij een overheid verlaten de commissie tijdelijk. Samen met de Bilderbergconferentie en de Council on Foreign Relations wordt de TLC gezien als de grote machtsdriehoek van de heersende elite.
Dat Wellink lid is, daarover bestaat al lang geen twijfel meer, maar de vraag mag niet aan hem gesteld worden, anders verschijnt hij niet in de media. Ook Onno Ruding heeft een zetel en kwam oorspronkelijk van het IMF. Ook hij eist van de media dat de vraag over de TLC niet gesteld wordt. Andere Nederlandse leden zijn Joris Voorhoeve, Hans Weijers en Alexander Rinnooy Kan.
Maar nogmaals, leden mogen nooit openlijk bekennen lid te zijn. Waarom niet?

De TLC en het IMF die China beginnen te adviseren-controleren… en zie daar…
Recentelijk was in het nieuws dat aan de Chinese miljoenenstad Shenzhen een financiële
 vrijhaven aangebouwd zal worden naar voorbeeld van Wallstreet, binnen 10 jaar. De financiële vrijhandel zal worden opgezet naar Westers model…
Per februari 2013 verlaagde de China’s centrale bank, People’s Bank of China, de kapitaaleisen van 50% naar 20%. Dit vele malen sterker dan de 0-7% van het Westen, maar de trend is duidelijk…
Over 20 jaar zal ook China bubbles en crises kennen… De sterke sociale samenhang zal er vernietigd worden zoals in West-Europa. Chinezen zullen ook individualiseren en afhankelijk worden van schuld en een keiharde neoliberale en zionistische moraal.

Conclusie: na vijf jaar is niets veranderd

g20-protests2_1374149c

WIE IS GEERT WILDERS

__
__
Wie is Geert Wilders nu eigenlijk. Wat weten we van hem.
Hiervoor is opvallend weinig heldere aandacht in de media, terwijl zijn impact, ook economisch, zeer dominant is. Na lang fundamenteel onderzoek kan een profiel worden geschetst dat we hier publiceren.

Geert Wilders – bewezen seculiere vrije zionist en agnost – komt uit het (neo)liberale gedachtegoed. Een geloofsovertuiging is zionisme overigens niet, het beschrijft een seculiere extreem harde nationalistische liberale Joodse staatsinrichting met geen tolerantie voor andersdenkenden. Het is een keiharde politieke richting.

Zijn vader werd geboren te Maasbree, zijn moeder te Soekaboemi (voormalig Nederlands-Indië).
Geert’s oma is telg van de katholieke Indisch-Nederlandse familie Meijer. Met broer Paul heeft hij nauwelijks contact. Over zijn militaire dienst verklaarde Wilders pedant “blij te zijn dat hij nooit met de Duitsers één tent had hoeven delen” tijdens gezamenlijke NAVO-oefeningen, waarna hij voor twee jaar naar Israël vertrok met vergoeding van kosten. Geert z’n eerste huwelijk is in Israël voltrokken met een Israëlische Jodin. In Israël voelde hij zich direct thuis, verklaarde hij destijds. Sinds 1992 is hij getrouwd met een Joods-Hongaarse vrouw genaamd Krisztina.

Hoewel Wilders zelf Katholiek is opgevoed, heeft hij zich later uitgeschreven. Joodse en Indische normen en waarden heeft hij sterk meegekregen. Hij is pro-Israël, anti-Duits en ondersteunt via Twitter de ideologie van Israël.
Nederlands Indië was –  en Indonesië is nog steeds –  een apartheidsstaat met kastenstelsel. Racisme heeft er daardoor zeer sterke wortels. Voor ingewijden is het een algemeen heersende (maar stille) moraal. Mensen van Indische afkomst en antropologen hebben me regelmatig in vertrouwen toegelicht en bevestigd dat geëmigreerde Indiërs nog altijd snel geneigd zijn apart te denken in stilte. (De VN gebruikt voor kastendiscriminatie de omschrijving ‘discriminatie op basis van werk en afkomst).

De ideologie van Israël, en dat hij er twee jaar met vergoeding van kosten was, verraadt zonder meer het zionisme.
Deze beweging (AIPAC) stimuleert volgers om in Israël te vestigen of om het te bezoeken en AIPAC is een zeer zware controversiële Zionistiscche lobby gezeteld in de VS. Het doneert en financiert pro-zionistische bewegingen zoals die van Wilders. Ze helpt financieel, spioneert en is in de VS het grootste Joodse lobby-club voornamelijk gefinancierd door Amerikaans-Joodse grootbankiers (bijna allen zionisten) o.m. gelegen bij Wallstreet.

In het eerste internationale zionistisch congres te Basel 1897 is het verdrag gemaakt dat Israël beschouwt als het huidige grondgebied. Zionisme is geen religie, maar staat voor een extreme seculiere liberale Joodse nationalistische staatsinrichting zonder assimilatie van andersgelovigen. Het meent dat Jerusalem de centrale troon van de vrije wereldmacht behoort te zijn waar één koning centraal regeert voor en over hardwerkende onderdanen (volstrekt niet democratisch en extreem liberaal kapitalistisch, dat dus alleen maar gefinancierd kan worden d.m.v. blijvende oorlogsproductie). Geert gelooft in zulke moraal, hij deelt immers zijn macht vrijwel niet of totaal gecontroleerd, en hij zoekt ook altijd een “vijand”.

Dat Israël extreem seculier Joods nationalistisch liberaal  (=zionistisch) kapitalistisch is hoeft niet betwijfeld te worden. Vrijwel alle politieke partijen in Israël hebben dat signatuur op een paar uitzonderingen na.
Let wel, internationale grootbanken zijn vrijwel allen seculier liberaal Joods (=zionistisch) met dezelfde soort zeer extremere moraal. Lloyd Blankfein, CEO van Goldman Sachs heeft immers diverse malen herhaald: “I’m doing God’s work”. In het zionisme is de connectie met religie en goden echter zeer ver op de achtergrond of is er vrijwel niet, omdat zionisme een seculiere erg harde liberale Joodse staatsinrichting beschrijft en geen religie, exact zoals Wilders.
Het sterke anti-Duits heeft Geerts meegekregen van z’n vader vanwege oorlogservaringen.

We kunnen tot de conclusie komen dat Wilders sterk is behept met een gemixte achtergrond waarin “het centrale ik/koning-“, “keihard liberaal-“, “apart”-, “anti”-denken en “keihard strijden” diep geworteld zitten. De Nederlandse burger zegt ‘m niets (zei hij al). Inderdaad, alleen z’n stemmers interesseren hem; die zullen volgelingen moeten zijn. En zo stelt Geert zich dan ook letterlijk op.

Wilders werd eerst lid van de VVD. Bij zijn entrée als parlementariër kwam hij voorjaar 1997 in de publiciteit met een openlijke aanval op de psychisch arbeidsongeschikten, waarmee hij snel een reputatie van keiharde rechtse liberaal verwierf. Daarna zeurde hij vaak om de seculier liberale zionistische term ‘Joods-Chirstelijk’ op te nemen in het grondschrift van de VVD. Wilders wilde het
zelfs opnemen in de grondwet, met name omdat Thorbecke destijds werd ‘omarmd’ door de Joodse Nederlanders. Frits Bolkenstein (Joods) steunde hem, maar het gebeurde niet. Bolkenstein en Wilders zien ‘Joods-Christelijk’ als bron van de verlichte Westerse cultuur. Geert kon z’n gram niet halen, werd extremer met taal en splitste af. Seculiere liberale zionisten hebben een zeer gespannen houding tegenover Duitsland, het Arabische Midden-Oosten met onseculiere Islam. In de VS zijn lobbykantoren die de antibewegingen steunen waaronder het dominante AIPAC), en meerdere politiek-zionistische kantoren in NY o.m. voor Geert Wilders.
Maar Geert is meer dan dat…

Wilders ziet wat hij ‘geprogrammeerd’ is te zien met zijn achtergrond. Maar hij is ook een vrije seculier liberale zionist die de Nederlandse economie wil modelleren naar het (liberaal Joods-Amerikaanse) casinokapitalisme met een bikkelharde moraal. Die stijl heeft z’n weg eeuwen geleden naar de VS gevonden.
Een eerste stap in die weg was dat stadhouder Willem III de (centrale) Bank of England heeft gesticht omdat hij ook over Engeland en Ierland regeerde, en Engeland failliet was. In 1688 werd Willem III de troon van Engeland beloofd als hij de heersende bankiers het recht gaf om geld te maken uit niets. Zijn twijfel hierover werd weggenomen doordat hij tegen 8 % rente zoveel mocht lenen als hij wilde o.m. om oorlog te voeren. Het werd gemodelleerd naar de Nederlandse Wisselbank gecombineerd met de VOC. Door dit recht van geldcreatie willens en wetens aan een private partij te geven, legt Willem III van Oranje de basis waarop de onbeperkte macht van de huidige bankiers is gevestigd. Alle Westerse banken hebben dat model overgenomen. Een opmerkelijke bepaling in het oprichtingsstatuut was “The Bank hath benefit on the interest on all monies which it creates out of nothing”. Mede hierdoor kon de regering haar activiteiten financieren door op deze wijze geld te lenen, in plaats van het zelf te maken. En zo werd het fenomeen staatsschuld geïnstitutionaliseerd.
Vervolgens kreeg de Joods seculier liberale bankiersdynastie Rothschild The Bank of England in de
19e eeuw privé dominerend in handen, en dus ook de geldcreatie. Joods seculier liberaal staat gelijk met zionisme. Politiek zionisme bestond nog niet, maar de moraal heerste al wel. Daarin zit een extreem gedachtengoed gesloten dat het niet uitmaakt wie of wat het dient, zolang het z’n werk maar kan verrichten, grootkapitaal in dit geval.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt begon met het grote wereldwijdse bankierswerk door z’n zoons mulitinationaal te stationeren met indringende politieke inmenging, ondermeer in de onafhankelijke 13 Colonies, nu de VS. Zoon Edmond James de Rothschild was pushende aanhanger, financier en daardoor grondlegger van het zionisme dat uiteindelijk heeft geleid tot de staat Israël.
De onafhankelijksoorlog van de VS was een Frans-anti-Engels gefinancierde opstand tegen het woeker kapitalistische Engeland onder King George III, omdat hij wurgbelastingen hefte die het volk zat waren. In het begin van de 20ste eeuw kregen de Duits-Joodse Bankiers toch weer hun giftige banksysteem door de VS-politiek waaruit “onrechtmatig” de FED is ontstaan.

Het woekerkapitalisme is dus een Nederlandse en Duits-Joodse export en verklaart waarom Nederland zo enorm z’n hoofd laat hangen naar de VS en het vrijwel kopieert. De Amerikaanse FED en Europese ECB komen voort uit dezelde traditionele gedachten rondom Frankfurt en The Bank of England. Niet voor niets zijn de financiële harten ‘Wallstreet’, ‘The City’ en Frankfurt. Het vrije kapitalistische woekermodel past perfect in het plaatje van liberale Europees-Joodse seculiere superbankiers die wilden uitbreiden naar de Colonies/VS. Dit verklaart ook waarom Nederland en de VS hetzelfde beleid voeren over de Israëlische kwestie, en met Duitsland, VS en Engeland het beleid van keihard neoliberaal super(wurg)kapitalisme met NY, London en Frankfurt als de financiële hoofdsteden.
Overigens wijzen hedendaagse sociale Joden de liberale seculiere Joodse riching af, omdat het gelijk staat met zionisme als oorzaak van wurgkapitalisme.

De vrije seculiere liberale Christelijk-Joodse traditie is: wie niet werkt krijgt geen uitkering, want is zich niet waard aan de staat en mensheid, alle gevangenisstraffen moeten hoger, de invloed van de staat moet minder, veel privatiseren (voor de centrale financiële ‘koningen’) met alle gevolgen van dien, eerst ik en mijn familie, de rest moet maar voor zichzelf zorgen, enzovoorts. Als je niet aan de ’s lands normen voldoet moet je weg. Maar ook: wie mij volgt zal worden beloond.
Exact zó extreem denkt Geert, maar dan openlijk. En het racisme zit in z’n genen.

Wilders beseft wat er achter het gordijn van de EU zit, en verzet zich daarom fel tégen Europa. Hierin krijgt hij geen steun vanuit de gestettelde Europese en Amerikaanse publieke elite die ook de media besturen, subsidiëren of bezitten.
Hij noemt het daarom regenten. De zittende machtshebbers lusten hem niet, omdat hij het spel niet meespeelt.
Het verklaart ook waarom hij de uitkomst van het Catshuis-overleg glashard verwierp. De traditie van keihard strijdende zionist is immers dat hij niet of nauwelijks onderhandelt, of met buitenproportionele extremen. Terwijl de Christelijk-Katholieke seculiere liberale lijn altijd zal blijven marchanderen (ook al komen beiden uit Limburg).

Waarom vertikt hij het om in de publieke omroepen (NPO) op TV te verschijnen. Het NPO-bestel dient een ferm eigen belang: bakken met overheidsubsidies snaaien. De pot wordt nu verdeeld door het ministerie van OCW met PvdA minister (voorheen met CDA-minister). De pot, besteding, programmering en moraal wordt bestuurd onder NPO’s bestuursvoorzitter Henk Hagoort, CDA-lid sinds jaren 80, directeur EO en evangelist, maar recentelijk overgestapt naar PvdA juist vóórdat Samsom werd gelanceerd door de media en een PvdA-er minister werd OCW in plaats van een CDA-er. Toevallig?

De RTL-Group (4 5 7 8) is eigendom van de Bertelsmann Stiftung. Daar wordt beleid gemaakt en RTL directief bestuurd. Voorziter (Executive Board) is de Nederlandse CDA-er Aart Jan de Geus die tevens voorzitter is van ‘Stragisch beraad CDA’. In het RTL-commessariaat heeft Onno Ruding (CDA) een plaats alsook in de RTL Auditgroup. Voor Geert is dus ook RTL een CDA-bolwerk.

De publieke TV (NPO) en RTL worden nu dus dominant CDA-PvdA gestuurd. Het strookt absoluut niet met Wilders z’n gedachtegoed. Bij uitzondering verschijnt hij voor hun camera als hij een kort statement heeft in zijn belang; hij gaat geen discussie aan. Voor debatten maakt Wilders noodgedwongen uitzonderingen, maar hekelt het ferm. Interviews geeft hij niet voor publieke journalisten. Op RTL verschijnt Geert soms in debatten en interviews met Frits Wester (CDA), maar niet graag.

SBS6 (de ‘gezins-, Henk- en Ingrid-zender’), onderdeel van het Finse Sanoma (67 %) en Talpa (33 %) ligt Geert het beste. Hij krijgt o.m. een platform in ‘Hart van Nederland’. Eerder werd voor tegen-prestaties aangeboden z’n film Fitma op SBS6 te tonen.

Waarom kan Geert het vinden met advocaat Bram Moszkowicz. Hij was allereerst een topadvocaat maar ook liberaal seculier Joods. Bram heeft immers vaak gezegd: “Ik zeg u niet op welke partij ik stem. Op de SP zal dat zeer zeker niet zijn, zelfs verre van dat”.  In ‘Waar is de Mol”, gaf hij zijn afkeer aan jegens othodox geloof (dat socialisme sterker aanhangt).
Hij is dus liberaal, en Bram is Joods, “niet praktiserend” zei hij vaker. Dat duidt op seculariteit en vrijwel zeker op zionisme. Wilders en Moszkowicz delen dus tot op zekere hoogte gelijke waarden en normen. De moraal van liberale seculiere Joden is dat het niet uitmaakt wie ze dienen zolang ze hun werk kunnen verrichten. Bram heeft die instelling zonder meer, is bovendien uiterst intelligent en sluw. Dat profiel maakt hem topadvocaat, maar is ook een indringende gateway naar NPO-RTL (CDA-PvdA) TV dat Geert zelf hekelt.

Geert’s gedachtegoed blijft evenwel pervers, extreem liberaal-rechts, buitenproportioneel hard, egocentrisch en uiterst selectief. 

… En het volk mag instrument zijn voor z’n moraal door middel van sluwe retoriek…

Wilders wordt o.m. sterk gefinancierd door AIPAC, David Horowitz De laatste is een Amerikaans-Joodse schrijver, zionist, conservatief, anti-islamist, anti-socialist, en een policy advocate. Ofwel een agressieve lobby die vecht voor waar ie in gelooft of voor puur eigen gewin… Dat lobbykantoor ligt “toevallig” bij Wallstreet, NY.