THE CO2 FILES

__
__
CO2It’s been quiet about Global Warming.
But i’ve noticed that media covers it during warmer moments and after some disaster. So it’s trendy. And i observe ever growing extreme commerce about the issue.

Both believers and non believers of men made global warming have always had my attention.
I wrote my first article about it in may 2013 and about energy.

You can read it here (Dutch).

This post is a follow up and explains exactly what CO2 is from basic chemical and biological education.

We are then going to work on some numbers I haven’t seen done by anyone yet (!!)
Next is using data from the IPCC, NASA, MIT, National Geophysical Data Center, Aspen Global Change Institute and Berkley University.

I just wanted to explore what’s what and what’s not. If I’m wrong, I am wrong and will adjust my view.

In my earlier article I wrote to have had experiences of very hot summers during the 90s in Northern and Southern Europe. We saw very high temperatures. In the 80s, we had colder winters and less hot summers. However, this all can be explained by the El Nino effect. Basically a cycle of colder and warmer seasons over 7 years.

In that article I also disclosed the entire network of eco-politics-media-commerce closely tied in the highest levels. I’m not going to repeat that here, do read that article first perhaps.

Reading that post myself again, I still stand behind all the text, but I want to share my further knowledge on the subject. And i worked some numbers no one seemed to have done before (!!)

Why media is most always biased and hardly serves public interest is explained in this article: Welcome tot the Real world.

I’m not in the game of proving right or wrong, but I am in the game of constant learning and justification. And I do believe in underlying ratio, math, logic and plausibility since full proof never exists.
All we can do is add up knowledge, data and see for ourselves, instead of the lazy thing of laying on the couch and absorbing what media shows us.

And a good thing is I paid high attention during chemistry and bio college, and statistics as well to understand basics where 1 + 1 is still two.

Chemistry: CO2 and the fundamentals of Earth & Life

Szén_atomCO2 is a simple bond (mix) made from 3 chemical smallest possible parts (atoms) of the 2 elements C and O.
1 part Carbon, 2 parts Oxygen.

Carbon (C) itself is in almost all materials on earth.
No life as we know is possible without it.

C is the central building element of earth and life.
Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Phosphor (P), Sulphur (S)

do the rest, literary. O is what we breath. P is the main element for soil fertilising (farm land).

C is essentially prevalent for life !

C plays the central role, because that chemicals element bonds the easiest and therefore is found in most materials on earth. I’m not claiming C is the most trouble-free chemical element. But it is a prime factor for life. You hardly find any article in your home without C, except perhaps water and drinks without bubbles. Water should be cleaned from C anyway.

So C, H, O, P, S are all prime elements for life but C simply acts as the easiest, compared to most all chemical elements we know of.

Electrons always spin very regular around their core (nucleus) and super fast but not always in a perfect spaced orbit. In this way they more form a cloud around the nucleus.
For Carbon, 4 electrons swirl around as an outer cloud and 2 as an inner cloud.
(The electron cloud around C has two layers).
Elements bond by sharing some electrons.

Hydrogen (H) has 1 electron. It can share it with one C, and another H atom can share its electron with the same C. Now we have CH2, or Methylene.
The C atom can still take more electrons from another H.
Adding can give CH4, or Methane. It’s the natural gas you cook with, also called LNG.
The maximum of bonds between two elements is defined by rules, but that’s for chemistry college.

From carbon it is said, it’s the ‘tramp’ or ‘hooker’ in chemistry.
Carbon can take almost every chemical element easy to bond (mix) with, and super strong.

Consequently C is in almost everything. The strong bonding also means that it’s hard to break it apart.

More examples of bonds:

1 Part H and 2 parts of O make water (H2O).
1 Part C and 1 part O make CO.
1 Part C and 2 parts O make CO2.
Etc.

CO is not CO2 !!

herpes-confusionPeople easy mix them up.
Media and films don’t help much either.

CO (carbon monoxide) doesn’t occur naturally in the atmosphere.
It’s an odourless and almost invisible gas as a result of oxygen-starving inefficient combustion.
Old technology in the 60s, 70s and 80s produced it in large; the grey-blackened smoke. Think about the old cars, old furnaces, but also house fires and candles.
It swarms wide spread in open air so is almost invisible

CO2 (carbon dioxide) comes from efficient optimised ventilated combustion; still odourless but totally invisible gas. It also occurs naturally in the atmosphere in super abundance.

CO2 is needed for life on earth as we know it; totally impossible to live without that abundance.
So where CO is unhealthy and a pollutant, CO2 is life and very healthy.

All plant life on earth and in the ocean inhale CO2, takes the C and breaths out the 1 remaining part O.
All mammals, reptiles, birds and fish on earth (including us humans) inhale O for combustion of what they ate; so what’s in their cells. Then exhale CO2 for all green life, including for all plants and plankton in the massive ocean volume.
Oceans also create water vapour (H2O) by the sun’s heat, which form the clouds; clouds produce rain (accumulated H2O), and so on. Volcanoes and plate tectonics also release a lot of CO2.
It’s a total complete eco system of life.

Mind you that the total area of ocean + air from top to bottom, is zillions m3 more compared to the area in where we humans live. We cannot even imagine how massively relatively very super little our habitat is. It’s a drop in a billion litre tank.

Crunching numbers not done before

National Geophysical Data Center estimates (rounded numbers):

Ocean water:                        Air / Atmosphere:
~200,000,000 km3               ~500,000,000 km3

Total volume of ocean water + air:
200,000,000 + 500,000,000 = 700,000,000 km3.

1 km3 = 1,000 km2

So, flattened calculated, the total ocean water + air:
700,000,000,000 km2.

Earth’s land mass:
~148,000,000 km2 is total land mass, flattened calculated.
~37,000,000 km2 land mass is habituated by humans.

37,000,000 km2 / 700,000,000,000 km2 = 0.0053%

So in that tiny fraction of 0,0053% is where we live !!
And we do not even use all of that super miniature space.

More about CO & CO2

questionCO2 is healthy and goes up in the atmosphere. CO is unhealthy, stays low and swarms locally.

So keeping the local air clean from CO (carbon monoxide, which isn’t CO2) makes sense.

Too much CO suffocates, is bad for the longues and blocks sun light. This was the smog we had in Europe after WWII, and China still has in cities. (CO could be written as CO1, or C1O1, but 1s are always unwritten in chemistry. )

As CO was the result of old fashion oxygen-starving combustion, catalysers were fitted.
So if emissions by all vehicles and industry are the result of efficient and optimised ventilated combustion with a catalyser, they emit CO2 instead of CO. It’s where we are since the 90s.
And that’s fine.
Old vehicles emitted too much CO (the grey-blackened smoke), and that’s not good. Still the case in China and India on large scale, but that’s gone here, although smog in cities do still occur.

So CO2 is super vital to life (never a pollutant or unhealthy !!).
It’s absolutely essential and in massive abundance needed as a building block of earth and life.
CO2 is super good !!

Carbon is all well? No down sides?
The down side is that chemical bonds with C are super strong, therefore hard to break up.
However, all plants on land and in the ocean (including plankton) need CO2 to live and grow, so they inhale it, break it up to exhale O.
So breaking it up can’t be that hard. But it does take some form of energy, for example electricity, but there are other ways such as synthetic photosynthesis (basically replicating plant leaves).
Using intense concentrated sunlight is another rather easy way.

Black coal is very misunderstood as well.
Coal is majorly made out of Carbon which has bonded with lesser parts of hydrogen (H), Sulfur (S), Oxygen (O) and Nitrogen (N). Coal is a pure organic fuel which contains all elements of life.
Why is that? Because coal is basically decayed (rotten) plants and trees put under pressure for millions of years in the earth. Less decayed is brown coal and even less rotten is turf.

Coal and wood powered steam engines from the 1800s up to the early 1950s. And people heated their buildings with wood, turf and brown coal. All those are oxygen-starving processes.
Today electricity is often still produced by coal. The smoke you see from the towers is however water vapour, perfectly harmless. Water is used too cool down in those modern cooling towers today; so that’s the water vapour you see (H2O).

Coal does however stay in the closed burning energy production furnace in the industry to be exhausted into catalysers; emitting CO2 in the open air, not CO.
Again, the white smoke we see is the water vapour from the cooling towers.
We don’t heat our houses with open furnaces anymore since the 70s, and we don’t burn coal or wood anymore to power trains since the 50s. And cars and industry are fitted with catalysers.

The huge countries India en China, responsible for ~33% of earth’s population, do not heat their houses and buildings at all, or hardly (own experience). China in the North can be cold. People simply dress for it, they do not heat their houses at all. Only some good restaurants and star hotels provide heating.
In Africa they often cook with wood and use old cars which emit CO, but not in large enough that it pollutes, nor does it concentrate in the air.
China however produces a lot of CO in the open air by industry, and by old and simple super cheap vehicles we had 50 years ago. The majority uses those because that´s what they can afford for now.

As we have learned, C can bond easy, so CO can be transformed to CO2 but some energy would be needed. Sun light will transform the CO to CO2, however it takes more time than producing CO in large scale. Africa doesn’t produce CO in large so the sun light can do the work.

But China does and the sun plus the air with oxygen can’t keep up, so accumulating low in the atmosphere, it pollutes locally. It blocks the sun locally, gives a light suffocated feeling, dizziness and is terrible for the lounges. That’s horrific for health indeed.

But again, CO is not CO2.
CO is unhealthy, stays low and swarms locally.
CO2 is an absolute vital life component and rises up in the atmosphere.

All political focus here today seems to be on CO2 since the problem of CO is resolved, which is very odd. It shall be demonstrated in a later graph.

Our Atmosphere

CO2 is not the main component of the atmosphere. It varies between 0.3 and 1.0% (there are different claims). This chart shows 0.38% CO2 of all gases in the atmosphere; Aspen Global Change Institute.

Atm_Composition

The green house gases regulate earth’s temperature, and these are:

CO2                          0.38%
Methane (CH4)           0.0001% (is the same as the gas from your gas stove, called LNG).
Nitrous Oxide             0.00013%
Hydrogen                   0.00001%
Water vapour (H2O)    2.00% – 3.00% (can never be higher than 4.00%).

Ozone isn’t even mentioned; averages ~0.000004%

Remember that Ozone was a big political issue and for Greenpeace ? Laugh !

High water vapour feels uncomfortable and sweaty but water has the second highest specific heat capacity of all known substances. That means it requires high amounts of heat energy to raise its temperature.
Water also has a high energy/heat requirement for evaporation, and evaporation is directly related to cooling of the ambient temperature.

So whatever politicians now try to make believe… they should go back to school on this matter…

CO2 (and also CH4) are interesting to look at, because as said, C bonds so super strong that it takes years to decay where other gases decompose faster and some even within a few days, some even near immediate. CO2 takes hundreds of years to decompose by itself. However CH4 decays within decades.

As you see, CO isn’t in it. It forms local problems for other reasons such as health which is of high priority concern, but not related to so called men made global warming.
We’ve done away with CO and smog in Western Europe, and in Eastern Europe since the Berlin wall has fallen.

Environmentalism

During the 60s, 70s and 80s our western environment had indeed become highly polluted as in the former east bloc. Mainly CO and consumed litter everywhere. But that’s long gone. Plastics are being recycled, etc. Although plastics in ocean seems to be an issue, but that has attention.

Land here is very much cleaned up and we should be happy.

But in the mean time entire big environment business and political careers have been build up… All wanting to keep that to utilise it, as well as students find subsidies or work in that field. Checking internet, shows the total madness around CO2 alone, all profiting from it.

As we say in business… all is green, as long as we can make big bucks from it.

It all has much more to do with making big money, careers, scoring politically and taxing the public. Political green parties have established from early environmentalists and career hunters today, using environment as their unique selling point. But that all has nothing to do with science and reality of today at all.

Mind you, the next political thing just might be Methane (CH4), in other words your natural gas…

Shell and British Gas have just merged forming one of the biggest energy corporations in the world. They deliver many politicians, have politicians and bankers in their board of directors and in non executive boards, are number one in massive pollution scandalous (Africa, Ukraine, Americas, etc) and they drive direct causes of wars, crises and blockades… WWI, WWII, all of the Middle East since WWI, the Caucasus, Ukraine, Afghanistan, Africa…

Methane isn’t exactly going to be reduced whatsoever. In fact it is expanding since wars are going on about it; north Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Donetsk.

What adds up and what doesn’t

156564_mozg-ludzki-use-itDo you really believe, we living in 0.0053% (which we do not use all) can make even the smallest ripple in all air and ocean water of
700,000,000,000 km2 ??

CO2 only forms 0.38% in the total atmosphere on top of that !!

Not only that, there is much more they don’t tell us about CO2, which we shall explain further.

IPCC

The IPCC is installed by the UN. It doesn’t research or measure anything. It collects data only and reports. Members of the IPCC are chosen by politics. Internal disputes made scientists leave. They saw it was a political and money driven monster and debates were not tolerated. The IPCC is mainly to service the politics which gives subsidies, so it provides some scientists with big careers and to support politics for their case. But that’s not science.

The IPCC keeps all leaving authors on their list. On the leavers own request, the IPCC did not remove them with the argument that they had contributed. The leavers argued they didn’t since they did not agree and court had to come in between. That shows how politically loaded the IPCC is.

So, if it is claimed that many scientists agree, it only means they are on the list of IPCC’s authors.
That doesn’t mean they concur whatsoever. The IPCC is just a harsh stingy beast.

Basically, I’m very familiar with these kind of government scientific institutes as well. Account managers have clear annual targets. That is, get as much subsidies as possible. All outcome of the projects for application are already determined, they are to serve pre-projected goals of commerce and politics.
That has nothing to do with science.

The IPCC isn’t different.

CO2 levels and earth’s Temperature

Ok, so I took a look at earlier and the latest IPCC reports, from NASA, MIT and Berkley university.

Interesting is that CO2 has gone up from 187 ppm over billions of years to ~270 by ~1800 when the industrial revolution began. Then it shoots up. In 2000 CO2 was 400 ppm.

stuart2

Reports of 2014 shows a climb to 450.

Interesting, but we can also show the growth of donkeys worldwide…
an increase of ~20% since 1966…
Or growth of human population shows exactly the same hockey stick like CO2…

I can also make a graph showing the increase of cows since 1800… Shows exactly the same curve. Laying that over the CO2 curve, there you are, a clear correlation… cows caused more CO2…

The IPCC just picks their stuff for show…

More interesting, from 400 to 450 CO2 isn’t an actual increase of 0.12.
400 stands for… 400 parts per million (ppm)….

So the actual increase is 50 parts per 1,000,000… or 0.00005 (!)

Sure, when I present an increase from 187 to 270 and then suddenly to 450 on a graph, it shows bad… Good for a horror show…

But the actual increase is 0,00002 to 0.00003 and then to 0.00005… Alarming?

I guess, the increasing use of paperclips shows the same graph, or the number of cups of tea we all drink more since 1800… I mean…really…

Oh, then it is over population then…
Is it…

The IPCC shows that the average earth temperature has gone up very steady by 0.51 oC since 1880, not following the CO2 trend at all. NASA, MIT and Berkley show the same graph.
The graph shows it clear: a very steady average increase of 0.51 oC from 1800 to now, 2015.

616910main_gisstemp_2011_graph_lrgThat curve shows no sudden uptrends.

Over 400,000 years to present, the average temperature shows very regular pattern up and down, almost like a heart beat. All ups and downs are within the same bands and no signs of going out of trend at all.

vostokBut wait…how do scientists measure historic temperatures…

In 2003 they took arctic ice and measured the contents of CO2 all down to pre-historic layers.
So they assumed that temperature and CO2 are correlated in the first place.
If you take that as assumed correlation… it automatically calculates a temperature directly related to it, exactly as you wanted.
Who says that this direct relation is correct… It’s an assumption, not proven yet.

The prove does not exist, because the IPCC, NASA, MIT and Berkley university all confirm that earth’s temperature has been stable since 1997. Yet CO2 has gone up from 400 to 450…

We hardly can find graphs about earth’s average temperature all up to 2014 on the internet. Most stop at 2000… very handy to convince people otherwise, but that’s manipulating.
This graph shows 1997 to 2014.

Climate depotMIT and Berkeley also came to the conclusion that, although over a million parameters are measured and collected into data sets, there is no computing power available yet to do all the computations. These kind of powerful computers simply don’t exist yet.

Data is selected by the IPCC, entered and processed with loads of assumptions made in the software models, and then presented in the worst looking way.
It was also concluded that there are more unknowns than knowns

And having seen IPCC’s graphs presented, I must agree… manipulated.

Statistics can be presented in many ways. What I notice is the IPCC blows up Y axes to exaggerate curves and use tiny fractions of integers. And different time scales are presented with inconsistent conclusions in such a way that the case seems confirmed.
Also incomplete correlations are being presented, as well as important info is left out.

And interesting is that the number of measurements devices increased and changed over time. Also locations were added and changed.
Change and increase of devices, methods and locations create a pile of errors and unknown variations, known as ‘error margin’. For example, measuring temperature by UV light or by using mercury can easily give a variation of +/- 1 oC, no matter how fine they are calibrated or adjusted. And measuring more urban makes a big difference too. The devices used… really many are high tech, but also many are not at all.

Anyway, an error margin of at least +/1 oC is to be taken into account most likely.

Since the IPCC does only collect a million of data types, totally does no measuring themselves, is politicised bureaucratic on a political agenda, depending on that subsidy, using loads of assumptions, models and manipulate statistics, I really can’t see how they it ever able to have an actual clue whatsoever. Let alone understanding the more unknowns than knowns or even be credible.

Silence info about CO2

DangerVery interesting is what professors of MIT and Berkley say about CO2 as they wanted to explore effects of CO2.

Contained and raising CO2 levels made plants grow quicker in their botanical environment !!
Temperatures didn’t rise.
Quicker growing plants means they inhale CO2 faster and produce O more rapid.

Mythbusters experimented as well. They showed that temperature goes up by 1oC if CO2 was multiplied by 12,000 in a small space, the size of a home fish tank.
No plant life was in the tank.

Mythbusters concluded… “There is a relation between CO2 and temperature. Confirmed”.
I call that media propaganda because there was no plant life and CO2 was accumulated totally unrealistic overly exaggerated by 12,000x. And plants breath CO2, exhaling O.

Earth’s real rise of CO2 is 0.00005, remember ?

MIT and Berkley continues about CO2.
If there is the slightest increase of temperature, nature will correct it in many ways.
One way is that water will vaporise just a fraction of already a tiny bit more, cooling the environment down. During the small ice age in the middle ages for instance, Europe had grown vast forests in advance due to the warmer era earlier. This was the result of more CO2 available.
Deforestation began naturally as people needed the wood for many purposes.

And there are many ways nature balances. Our super tiny habitat and impact in the total zillion more area of air and water is none other than being part of a cycle. Over population isn’t even a factor in our super tiny space. And even that nature does correct. From 2050 onwards, earth’s population will decrease. But then again, population and its emissions don’t have the tiniest effect on earth’s temperature via a zillion more air + water.

A scam?

i-want-my-money-backPerhaps something has gone out of control as a huge industry derived from it.

Co-founder Patrick Moore of Greenpeace left for that reason. He said in many interviews that he saw it getting highly politicised. A small example. Greenpeace wanted to forbid Chloride totally to 0.0. Moore said… “Hold on, that’s on the periodic table and it’s a natural earth element, nature needs it, we cannot forbid it.” And so he had many fights and left.

By now, a lot of ex Greenpeace members are in the highest ranks of global politics and institutions.

Do you really believe, we living on 0.0053% can make a ripple in all air and ocean water which is a total of 700,000,000,000 km2 ??
And CO2 forms 0.38% in the total atmosphere on top of that !!

And moreover, the correlation between CO2 and temperature rise isn’t proven at all. In the contrary, it is proven that CO2 actually corrects indirectly by growing plants and trees quicker.
Worse of all, all presentations about men made global warming are full of manipulations, hammered on us daily.

Having crunched most crucial matters not done before and having unwrapped the hocus pocus, we can safely come to the conclusion that global warming is far from plausible and far from logic and analyses. It isn’t happening since the middle ages, not since 1800, not since WWII and certainly not in the last 18 years… !!

I’m not saying we shouldn’t care about our planet. I believe we should live very considerate, but I do want to separate propaganda from reality basic stuff.

But I do think it is about time to ask a pile of taxes back !
All the CO2 based taxes… really…

Advertenties
Afbeelding

MÁXIMA AND THE LIES

The truth about Inclusive Banking

11bank1Wow, doesn’t that sound just great…
Inclusive banking. But what is it…

Princess Máxima is one of the voices for the UN to promote it since she has done so for Micro Finance.

Máxima came from the HSBC bank and Deutsche Bank. Both banks stood at the birth of the financial crisis. The highly negative track record of Deutsche Bank is one of its own.

Deutsche Bank was the main contributor of WWII by the US-educated Rothschild family, now delivers member of the board for Shell and many other big influential internationals. DB is directly linked to the FED (co-onwership), BIS, Trilateral commission, is a main driver as  root cause of the economic collapse and construction of the Greek national debt fraud together with Goldman Sachs (swap technique which is known to be the root cause of the financial destruction). Deutsche Bank has always fitted perfectly in the royal house because of all connections and deep refined hidden politicized financial influence at the very highest transatlantic top of international corporations, finance and politics.
And these are totally not interested in the good for mankind, but in their own pockets only.

The HSBC bank was the first one lending money at ever rising interest to the very poor in Detroit. Many could never afford the interest and all went wrong for them. And HSBC knew very well what they were doing. HSBC grabbed their property for a penny. Shortly after other big banks followed the HSBC scheme. And it all crashed in 2007/2008.

What is inclusive banking? Basically selling debt and insurance to the very poor.

Many parts of the world lack access to banking systems. Is that bad? The exact reason why there is no access simply is because in those parts people can live from their land. Money, insurance and debt is something they can totally live without. They do not want and even need it all.

Most people here in the West aren’t aware, but about 2.5 billion people on the planet still live like that. We can’t even imagine and Tv expose them as poor. We are so totally brainwashed by Tv, politics and our Western society that we simply refuse to believe this. Well, Africa, China, India… they have huge areas where people still live happily ever after… Again around 2.5 billion world wide. But are they poor? They actually live their life, different than we in the West, yes.

Huge parts of Africa and India are a good examples. Small farmers own land and can simply live from it. They live a pure self-supporting and self-protected life. They do not use modern intensive farming because they just want to feed their family and community. That’s all they need. It’s of course not what Tv show us… They show continuous selective hunger and poverty, of course because it’s big business for them, and for the massive pile of worldwide politicized charities affiliated with the UN who are willing to pay an overkill of prime time commercials. Charities where CEOs, directors and staff are paid very very thick, or are subject to corruption or at least to very very mixed interests.

However since a very long time already, investors have had their eyes on fruitful soils in Afrika and India. Africa is not exactly a desert. There are masses of plenty fruitful lands to be exploited by Western investors, specially more at the coastal areas.

Western big investors have high connections (and even seats) with governments. Western politics is filled with it as well as the UN. They promote via local radios that the small farmer should sell their land to change it to intensive farming, the Western way.

Many farmers refuse as they don’t need money at all. That money is a one-time income while the land they have is their life time sustainability… for free. But investors are for huge profits so they have convinced local governments that industrial collective intensive farming will bring economic development. In Western perception, sure it does, but…

It’s really a trojan horse

Trojan-horse-PSW.Generic11.AEPE_Again, what the landowners already have is great for them, as their land provides sustainability locally already. They have free food and shelter. Not to our standards, but what if you and i could live free from land and not work in a dictatorship called ‘industry’ and debt… which is basically our system of economic slavery.

Of course those simple farmers have to work, but they can simply live from their land at own will and do not depend on money and any debt at all. In such communities in Africa and India people help each other out, simply because there is no competition going. It’s a very social and sustainable environment. With little luxury and little expectations. Just a good enough and a total free life for their happiness.

But in the end, those farmers are often pushed or forced to give up their land for a one-off price. Radio broadcasts are often done from simple shelters and Western investors pay them to air adverts for ‘Intensive farming’. The farmers get pushing visits from government officials and the big investors to turn to intensive modern farming. The more turning into that, the more the group pressure locally gets.

There comes the rescue… the UN and Inclusive banking

After the small farmers have sold their land joining the investment collective they are to buy seeds for it from expensive Monsanto and other stuff… on debt to start.
On debt of course… And of course the bank sells them another product as well… insurance…
Well, that’s inclusive banking in a nuthell.

Mind you, a vast majority of seeds in the world today are owned by Monsanto. Monsanto is a very hated bio-tech giant known by its worl wide aggressive purchasing program of seeds. Only in the Netherlands technological seeds are freely tradeble, but in the rest of the world mostly not. Monsanto is building a true monopoly and hurting agriculture this way, especially poor farmers in Africa and India who are forced to Western capitalism. Call this method pure imperialism !

And now it becomes even more interesting… family Monsanto… They were Jewish slave traders. Literally investors walking over people’s dead bodies.

Who are the main share holders behind Monsanto today. Among some others, mainly:
Vanguard Group, Inc.
State Street Corporation.
Interesting… exactly the same as the major shareholders of the FED who played a huge part in crashing the financial system and has totally corrupted within the government since beginning of the 20th century.

Who are the main shareholders of HSBC… Here we go again… Among some others:
Vanguard.
Fidelity…
Again, these are part of the main shareholders of the FED…

Interesting, all exactly the same shareholders who have brought the Western economy and countries to collapse, people into deep debt problems and those investors are deeply into the FED and government positions.

They did it here and now they are building that all up again there. And all because of… super profits… for them.

Farmer sells the land for a one-off price, become in permanent debt immediately, all investors and banks get their big fat income stream, Monsanto happy… the farmer may get into big trouble when his crop fails and is not helped anymore from the community (because of competition), can’t pay the interest anymore and is without any sustainable source.
Will the bank depreciate his debt? Lol, of course not. It remains a huge chain around the neck for the rest of his life.

And that all under the name of UN and inclusive banking… ‘Thumbs up’.

I’s a banking scam

HSBCWhat a huge scam, really. Certainly if you understand how money creation actually works (totally made from nothing).

How that works? Read this:
The biggest scam in history.

Máxima seems to be the perfect marionette for the UN and the total history of the royal house (tax free) among Willem Alexander who is to be the economic super lobby. But in fact many members of the royal family are heavy positioned in the top of international banking, usury, the many international hated corporations, the UN, FED, etc.

Let’s give them a lovely wave…

GOUD EN HET GROTE MALI LEUGEN

__
__
homepic2012Vast lezers van deze Blog begrijpen inmiddels waarom het westerse financiële systeem faalt en zal blijven falen. Het is enkel gebaseerd op fiat-geld dat alleen commerciële banken mogen aanmaken op niets.

Dat niets wordt permanent ‘opgeblazen’ door middel van derivaten zoals swaps en securites. Het kan slechts gedijen bij exponentiële groei van internationale business op basis van de Petrodollar.
Hoe dat disfunctioneert leg ik hier niet meer uit. Daarvoor kunt u het beste deze twee artikelen lezen.

Modern Plofkip Bankieren
The Biggest Scam in History (Youtube)

Ondanks de crash van 2008 is het systeem niet gewijzigd. De gevolgen zijn monsterlijk en permanent. Groei van publieke schuld is en blijft evident binnen dat systeem. Dat leidt continu tot bezuinigingen opgelegd aan het publiek, en tot ‘noodzakelijke’ oorlogen voor expansie van internationale business en die toegang en transport verschaffen van en tot aardse rijkdommen voor consumptie en welvaart. Daarbij vindt een blijvende massale waarde-overheveling plaats van publiek naar private investeerders. Binnen de EU werd het zelfs ‘vastgelast’ met de verdragen van Maastricht en Lissabon.

In de VS wordt het spel gespeeld door continu benoemingen van meest gevreesde Wallstreet-haaien voor topfuncties in staff en regeringen zoals Greenspan, Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, Lew et cetera. Via de Bank for International Settlements (BIS) en World Trade Organisation (WTO) crashten zij daarbij het systeem in ruil voor megawinsten en superbonussen. Presidenten zijn ‘puppets’. Ze komen aan de macht middels campagne-donaties uit cirkels van Wallstreet, aandeelhouders van de FED waar de ‘haaien’ een sleutelpositie hadden, de BISTrilateral Commission (TLC), WTO, IMF, Bilderberg netwerk, et cetera.

Aan de Europese kant ging het niet anders. Dezelfde corruptie heeft trans-Atlantisch plaatsgevonden met ‘bevriende’ netwerken zoals daar ook zijn de WTO, IMF, TLC, Atlantische Commissie, Bilderberg netwerk, Dexia, Paribas, Shell, BP, Fortis, RBS, Barclays, UBS, ING, Citigroup, ABN Amro, Rabobank, HSBC, Goldman Sachs Europe, Rothschild continuation holdings, IceSave, Deutsche Bank, de ECB, BIS en centrale banken van de lidstaten. Een paar bekende Nederlandse namen: Wellink, Wijffels, Groenink, Hommen, Elco Brinkman, Ruding, Balkenende, Bos, Zalm, de Koningshuizen van GB en Nederland… Denk Europees aan namen zoals Sarkozy, Draghi, Monti, Papandreou, Papadimos, Ackermann, Merkel, Steinbrück, Trichet, Carney, Weber, Tietmeyer, Blair, Brown…

Terug naar goud-backing van geld

goldDiverse grote naties hebben ingezien dat het westerse financiële systeem niet functioneert en hebben zich daarom rond 2010 losgemaakt van de Petrodollar en het IMF, te weten: Brazilië, Rusland, India, China en Zuid-Afrika. Zij vormen de BRICs-landen. Argentinië kwam er bij bij en Japan in de zomer van 2013. Indonesië volgt. Deze landen hebben goed door dat het westerse financiële systeem
faalt en besloten tot bilaterale handel van commodities (olie, gas, goud, zilver, etc) op basis van hun eigen munten in plaats van de Petrodollar. Ook Iran en Syrië staan aan de kant van de BRICs. Iran verkoopt olie en gas op basis van Roebels en de Yuan.
De BRICs-landen besloten begin 2013 een equivalent van het IMF te organiseren; een eigen reserve-instituut om het IMF heen. Oprichting van een eigen investeringsbank werd eveneens overeengekomen.

Welke munt zal de reservemunt van de BRICs-landen worden: de Chinese Yuan.

Voormalig Chinees staatshoofd Hu Jintao kondigde aan de Yuan weer volledig te ‘backen’ met goud. China is al 5 jaar op een rij de grootste goudproducent ter wereld en is snel op weg dit in stilte te realiseren. China cumuleert al jaren enorme goudreserves. Enerzijds produceert het zelf ca. 360 ton per jaar. Anderzijds steeg import van goud jaarlijks tot ver over 400 ton. Officieel rapporteert de Chinese Centrale Bank ca. 1.000 ton goudreserve, maar realistische schattingen tonen 6.000 ton. De VS is met 8.000 ton nog de grootste bezitter van goudreserves, maar dit zal niet lang meer duren.

Big 10 goudmijnen en hun eigenaren

China: Shandong Gold Group is grootste producent ter wereld, expandeert internationaal snel, heeft een enorm eigen financierings-campus en wordt door de staat gecontroleerd.

Canada met Gold Corp en Barrick Gold Corp als grootste producenten naast Yahama, Kinross Gold en Eldorado Gold. Ze hebben eveneens projecten in de US, Brazilië, Chili, Rusland en Ghana.

Australië met Newcrest mining en Focus Minerals Ltd als belangrijkste producenten.
51% Van Focus behoort tot de Chinese Shandong Gold Group.

VS, Newmont Mining. Productie neemt al jaren af.

Rusland met Polyus Gold als grootste gouddelver. Jaarlijkse productiestijging van ca. 5%.

Zuid-Afrika met AngloGold Ashanti en Gold Fields die grotendeels Afrika domineren met Canada.

Winstgevende grote goudmijnen in Afrika bevinden zich momenteel in Ghana en Mali. De meeste in Zuid-Afrika zelf maken geen winst meer. Daarnaast spelen goudmijnen in landen zoals Peru, Indonesië, Uzbekistan, Ghana mee in de top 10.

Mali staat nu nog op plaats 11, maar zal de grootste exporteur in Afrika worden. De mijnen vallen onder Zuid-Afrikaans AngloGold Ashanti. De overheid van Mali heeft 18% aandelen in bezit.

Europa heeft dringend goud nodig

De euro en Petrodollar zijn ‘giftig’. De Yuan heeft wél een gezond fundament met goud als backing.
In stilte zijn er plannen om de euro weer te backen met goud, maar Europa heeft het na WWII opgeslagen in de VS en krijgt het niet terug.

Europa zelf bezit geen goudmijnen en heeft beperkte toegang tot de bestaande; de dichtstbijzijnde prospects zijn Ghana en Mali. China heeft een enorme greep in de wereldvoorraad en breidt het uit.
De Canadese, Australische, Amerikaanse en ook Zuid-Amerikaanse goud-mijnprojecten zijn moeilijk of zelfs niet toegankelijk voor Europa. En de FED weigert Europees goud gewoonweg terug te geven aan landen als Duitsland, Frankrijk en Nederland. Daarnaast daalt goudproductie in de VS. Australisch alsook Zuid-Afrikaans goud gaat grotendeels naar China. Ook Mauretanië is een ex-Franse kolonie en exporteert goud naar Frankrijk en China, maar de productie is relatief gering en niet strategisch.

Brazilië, Rusland, China en Zuid-Afrika zijn BRICs-landen en Indonesië zal zich eveneens aansluiten.

Angela Merkel en Hollande (maar ook Charles de Gaulle al in de jaren 60) hebben door dat het westerse financiële systeem permanent is gecrasht als gevolg van de wijze waarop het monetair ‘giftig’ op niets is gereconstrueerd zoals de US dollar, en ook nog eens gebaseerd op de Petrodollar voor expanderende internationale handel. De schuldenberg neemt dientengevolge alleen maar toe. Merkel vroeg dit jaar niet voor niets het Duitse goud terug. Nederland stelde als volger van Duitsland dezelfde vraag maar dit werd uit het nieuws gehouden. Voor Merkel (dus Rutte) en Hollande is inflatie een ‘no go area’. Dus zit er maar één ding op… Goud roven uit Afrika.

Goudkoorts Mali

Randgold BillboardAl tijdens het vroegere grote rijk van Mali stond het al bekend om de enorme rijkdommen aan goud. Het klaterde er volop. Mali is een voormalige Franse kolonie, maar bleef altijd aan het lijntje. De voertaal is Frans, de munt bleef een afgeleide van de Franc. In 2012 werd er ook Uranium ontdekt. Bovendien werd in datzelfde jaar ontdekt dat grote diamant-aders voor komen. Ondanks alle verhalen in de mainstream-media kan maar één conclusie worden getrokken waarom Frankrijk Mali binnentrok na vondst van Uranium, en vanwege Goud en potentie van diamantwinning… Ouderwets imperialisme. Frankrijk is afhankelijk van kernenergie waarvoor Uranium nodig is, maar bovenal…
Vanwege de goudmijnen in het zuiden. Door het Noorden te bezetten en af te grendelen, wil de Franse overheid voorkomen dat het Zuiden (de mijnstreek) in handen komt van de rebellen. Daar ligt ook de potentie van de diamantaders en het Uranium.

Landonteigening

Er speelt meer in het midden en zuiden van Mali. Wie denkt dat het land een soort van woestijn is, kent de situatie niet. Het midden en zuiden van Mali zijn uitermate vruchtbare gebieden. De bevolking bestaat uit kleine boeren die letterlijk van hun land kunnen leven, al vele generaties. De ministers van de pro-westerse regering hadden en hebben vaak rondetafelgesprekken met grote landbouw-investeerders uit GB, VS, Frankrijk en Nederland om de Malinese landbouw te intensiveren.

De boeren willen hun land niet verkopen, omdat ze niets met geld hebben. Voor deze boeren is hun land het gegarandeerde levensmiddel van bestaan; hun levensgarantie, dat van hun families en kinderen. De regering heeft echter land-opkoopprogramma’s opgezet, gepromoot door lokale radio’s. Weerstand is echter groot. De investeerders willen o.m. suikerrietproductie en andere landbouw sterk intensiveren. 

Suiker(riet) is al een belangrijk exportproduct, maar de investeerders en regering willen méér winst. Onbelangrijk voor de boeren. Zij kunnen immers leven van hun land zonder geld en dus zonder schuld. Weerstand bleef aan. Het land ombouwen naar intensieve productie betekent dat ze óf hun land moeten verkopen zonder alternatieve middelen van bestaan, óf dure westerse zaden moeten kopen. Die zaden zijn duur, omdat een grote ‘race’ gaande is door elk patent van elke soort op te kopen.

Vooral Monsanto heeft een wereldwijd agressief opkoopprogramma van zaden. Alleen in Nederland zijn die technologische zaden vrij verhandelbaar, maar in de rest van de wereld meestal niet. Een firma zoals Monsanto bouwt een werkelijke monopolie-positie uit… en dupeert zo de landbouw, en vooral arme boeren in Afrika die gedwongen worden naar westers kapitalisme. Noem deze gehele methode maar gerust imperialisme.

Verkoop betekent verlies van een gegarandeerd levensmiddel van bestaan. Ombouwen betekent schulden (microkrediet). Zowel de opkoop van de gronden als microkrediet werkt volgens de methode van Modern Plofkip Bankieren, maar is voor de boeren zonder geld direct een woekerproduct vanwege hoge rente. En loonslaven, dat willen de mensen niet. Waarom zouden ze, ze konden immers levens van hun land en zonder geld en schuld. 

De investeerders en pro-westerse regering willen hun zin en dus kwam landonteigening op gang. Dit leidt tot ontheemding en verarming voor de lokalen en mogelijk vele vluchtelingen later terug op zoek naar zekerheid. Landonteigening voor uranium, diamant en goudwinning werkt op dezelfde manier.

De Malinese bevolking verliest keihard hun soevereiniteit voor ordinair westers gewin. Het zijn simpelweg ingrediënten voor oorlog, rebellie en slachtoffers. En vanzelf spinnen de vele zgn. goede doelen er later ook weer volop garen bij. Zie Goede doelen als Geldmachines.

Wie zijn de Milanese rebellen

Op Tv zien we uiteraard weer volop ant-islam propaganda, sharia en jihadisten. Maar 90% van de Malinese bevolking is al islamiet en sharia wordt in geen enkel islamitisch land toegepast. Het is van toepassing in Iran en heeft enkel betrekking op familiezaken en erfrecht. Daar is niets engs aan, maar anders dan westerse begrippen. Bovendien erkent de islam westerse universele rechten van de mens niet, omdat het niet compleet is volgens islamitisch moreel. De verbeterde universele islamitische verklaring van mensenrechten werd in 1981 overeengekomen binnen de islamitische gemeenschap. Daarin werd onder meer opgenomen dat mensen per definitie recht hebben op eerste levensbehoeften zoals onderdak en voedsel. In het westen zijn dat géén basisrechten. En binnen de neoliberale wereld is dat al helemaal geen basisrecht. Je moet er voor werken, en steeds meer voor steeds minder. Zo werkt het binnen de islam niet. Voedsel moet er altijd gedeeld worden en islamieten doen dat daarom altijd ruimhartig zonder aanzien des persoons. Het strookt allemaal niet met de westerse kapitalistische socio-economische gedachte.

Ik ben geen voorstander van enig georganiseerd geloof, omdat ik van mening ben dat het voornamelijk ellende veroorzaakt, polarisatie, discriminatie, intolerantie, onwetendheid, verdomming der mensen en halsstarrigheid.

Maar de eentonige anti-islam-geluid (rebellen, jihadisten, terroristen) in onze westerse media, daar moeten we niet meer in trappen, de geopolitieke achtergrond kennende.

Het zijn strijders vóór soevereiniteit… los van de westerse kapitalistische socio-economische val… ofwel los van imperialisme. De Toearegs strijden met hen. Ze streden in Libië, steunden Qadhafi en kwamen zwaar bewapend terug. Waarom? Qadhafi was weliswaar een vreemde vogel, maar had de GoudDinar geïntroduceerd en begon zo olie op basis van Roebels te verkopen…
Hij vormde zo een volledig soevereine staat. Foute boel voor de Petrodollar (dus ook voor de euro en Europa). Het land werd gedestabiliseerd en Qadhafi vermoord. Van een Arabische lente was daarom nooit sprake.

Men hoort het NOS-journaal en RTL-nieuws nooit zeggen: “Franse troepen hebben met steun van GB hun voormalige kolonie Mali ingenomen omdat zij met Nederland en Duitsland ernstig verlegen zitten om goud. Maar Mali heeft wat het zij hebben willen. Daarom gaat het ‘vrije Westen’ Mali bevrijden van haar goud, zoals het Libië heeft bevrijd van haar aardolie”.

Onze westerse media toont nooit de waarheid vanwege hoge concentratie van neoliberale macht en eenkennigheid. Dat ga ik hier niet toelichten. Hoe dat zit kunt u hier lezen:

Economy, War and Realism.
De Nederlandse spin-, en leugen-media wordt hier uitgelegd: Welcome to the Real World.

Uitbuiting en Imperialisme anno 2013

Grote schandalen werden al getoond dat kinderen in de Malinese goudmijnen werken. Die zijn eigendom van het Zuid-Afrikaanse AngloGold Ashanti. Dit bedrijf kreeg eerder de rating “het meest immorele bedrijf ter wereld”. De Malinese overheid is pro-westers en heeft 18% van de aandelen. Maar de bevolking is de armste ter wereld en crepeert. Dat rebellen strijden voor een soevereine situatie. Dit is een zéér begrijpelijke zaak. De as Frankrijk-GB-Nederland-Duitsland zal echter alles doen het te onderdrukken en te voorkomen.

Het bewijst wederom aan dat geld en kostbaarheden volgens het westerse kapitalistische socio-economisch model publieke welvaart vermindert waar het aan de macht is en zelfs vernietigt. Voor ons als burgers in Europa, en helemaal voor de allerarmste zoals in Afrika. Het vernietigt zelfs mensenlevens op grote schaal onder het mom van continu grote leugens en ernstige misleidingen.

En het toont aan waarom Mali voor Europa zo belangrijk is… Ouderwets imperialisme… en het westerse geldsysteem dat totaal ontspoorde door massale trans-Atlantische hebzucht en corruptie.

THE BIGGEST SCAM IN HISTORY

__
__
Many attempts have been made to inform about the fraudulent, destructive scheme of our currencies; based on nothing and backed by nothing. Most attempts were outdated but they have sparked critical thinkers able to expose the scam via superb recent work in line with current time.

How it is a Ponzi scheme, why and how it creates economic downfall and why it is legalised fraud.
The Euro and British Pound work the same way like all western currencies. So not the US dollar only.
On top, the US dollar is agreed upon being the western reserve currency for international trade.

This Blog is to expose the scam which is quite the read. But now for the first time i finally came across profound visuals explaining our toxic currency system. A true master piece.

Watch the video – an untold scam upfront adds

The video refers to 10% bank reserves. They actualy were reduced to 0-2% under the Basel accords
for all Tier-1 capital since 2002. This is base capital to be multiplied to 100% by Insurance banks and Investment banks by a Swap first. It’s a ‘security’ and it’s pure ‘Air’.
Basically it insures/guarantees the 0-2% for 100%. That 100% is then to be lend at interest for European and American government bonds (government public debt), mortgages and pension funds.
The Swap is: the Insurance bank insures 0-2% for 100% and gets a premium from the Investment bank from interest received from the 100%. But the 100% didn’t exist in the first place !!

We all people in the West pay interest and taxes on 98-100% Air ?? Yes we do !!
This scam upfront by Swaps isn’t even addressed in the video but caused the collapse in 2008.

Reserves for Tier-1 capital are to be at least 7% in 2019 which is still a joke. It will crash again !!

The Basel accords are part of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The FED is privately owned and holds a dominant seat. The BIS sets all western banking rules and isn’t a government entity. 

Latest research exposes the major owners of the FED:
Bank of New York, JP Morgan Chase (Rockefeller, JP Morgan), Deutsche Bank, Wells Fargo, Citigroup (Blackstone Group, The Vanguard Group, Fidelity Investments, State Street Global Investors, Capital Research and Management).

I can also add that most top government officials and advisors derive from the above mentioned banking networks as links and ‘moles’. Just a few examples as very tip of the iceberg:
Paulson came from Goldman Sachs. Geithner from FED NY and JP Morgan. Jack Lew is ex-Citigroup.
In Europe it’s no different, just much more scattered since each EU member has its own government.
For details i suggest the following articles:
Modern Plofkip Bankieren (Dutch, short read)
Economy War and Realism (English, long read).

Enjoy this video and do spread the word. All people are to become aware of it !

ECONOMY WAR AND REALISM

__
__
economyToday our world is an economy in shatters, educated on low paid pulp jobs, military clatter, perpetual growing national debts, mass unemployment, constant public cuts. Nothing has really changed since the crisis started in 2008.  
Internet films and sources claiming destruction of wealth is deliberately created are plentiful.

Is it deliberately constructed?

We shall break down this quest
by explaining how our classic socio-economy is organised.

This is not US or Europe alone. It’s a ‘contract’ agreed upon by the entire West since 1945.
Political parties are irrelevant. As a matter of fact, they form communicating barrels.
__

Basic capital socio-economics

All existing authorities and bodies in our western society do value wealth financially, so;

Value  =  Money  =  Wealth

Wealth is to growth by perpetual expansion of international business (World Trade Organisation).

It’s what classic free market capital economics is based upon. It’s pounded on us since school, college, university and by the media. And the dollar-euro is based on public moneydebt and the petrodollar.

What people not understand is that new money can never come into estistence without debt and without inflating it exponetial. It’s how the western capital banking scheme has been financially engineered since the FED exists and it goes for all western based currencies, especially the US dollar and Euro.
This article will explain it further down as current situation.
Money also has no backing whatsoever. Gold backing ended in 1971 by the Nixon term, so;

Money  =  by definition exponential cumulating public debt without backing  =  ‘Air’

Hence;

Growing wealth  =  growing airvalue  =  exponential more cumulating public moneydebt

usgs_chart4p0117fredgraphStable public moneydebt  =  imploding airvalue = imploding wealth

No moneydebt  =  no value or money in existence  =  no wealth

Since 2002 an extra exponent applied has been added: the uncontrolled pestilent swap market.

Growing airvalue  =  exponential cumulating public moneydebt x 100-exponent

So if the big air balloon of value deflates, capital socio-economics falls over the cliff extreme fast.

Can the above be balanced? Actually, it can’t.
Perpetual growth is a must for western capital socio-economics. Otherwise, we would all become financially poor and bankrupt quick, 
leaving moneydebts no one can ever pay back.

A falling paradigm above is a monster ‘cliff’ and back to medieval times.

Consequently;
Moneydebt  =  perpetual infinite monster profits for banks from nothing.
As from that nothing they receive interest over ever-inflating public debt x 100, and from premiums
received for the swapped securities over nothing. And this is basically Capital Fraud.
__

The devious out of control swap market

CreditDefaultSwap
Swaps are the root cause of the total economic collapse in 2008.

Basically with relatively very little own money unlimited value can be created from nothing and backed by nothing. This is a pyramid scheme, hence fraudulent. Swaps are an ‘invention’ of JP Morgan. By adopting this financial instrument into western banking practice and regulations by the WTO and BIS, it became a quick growing common practice since 2000.

__
Here is how it works:

As Investment bank, from relative very little own money you reserve 15 million (set apart).
Go to an AAA-rated Insurance bank (AIG, Credit Suisse) and promise them 0.5% income quarterly.
In return (as Swap) they’ll secure your 15 million for a value of 1.47 billion, and so they deposit that
1.47 on your account
in tranches (not all at once since they don’t have it cash).
To live up to your promise, you buy government bonds on the electronic auction worth 1.47 billion.
Governments pay you the (let’s say) 4.5% dividend (coupon-interest) over the 1.47 billion loan annually.
As the Swap agreed upon, from that received, you pay your little 0.5% security premium to AIG.

But investment banks actually don’t need to find an insurance bank, as they all have one themselves.
Big player investement bank Pimco derived from Insurer Allianz as quick example, or Goldman Sachs has GSAM, Goldman Sachs Insurance Asset Management. Basically all banks can play and cover both sides of the game rather quick and simple.

So, all banks filthy rich from air/nothing, government in debt for real. It is pure Capital Fraud.

Since this is complex, the public is told: “the government prints money”. But it doesn’t print anything.
It cumulates national debt to get electronic money in return in tranches based on the banking swap pyramid / fraud above.

You can’t do this, and i can’t. This is possible only with a bank charter at least AA-rated with clients able to push millions around. Basically it’s free money for the über-rich.
And interest is money that doesn’t exist as it was not principally created in the first place. Still it has to be paid. How? Taxes, public cuts and by increased debt; so more taxes, public cuts…

It explains empty new office buildings, mega projects making no sense. It explains ever-growing national public debt. It also explains massive military expenditures. Because should capital socio-economics fail then there is always a new enemy to focus on, and war trade guarantees banking business as a last resort. Therefore, economic distress has always been the prologue of big wars without any exception.
__

Current situation since 2002-2008

Direct finance of western governments by the FED, ECB or national central banks is either obstructed
or prohibited. 
Creating money for governments by the FED, ECB or by national banks is respectively obstructed and prohibited as well. The little minting and printing paper notes they actually do, makes about 2% of all money in roulation only. This doesn’t add to the economy. 98% Is electronic which does the actual work. And also governments are prohibited to create money themselves directly.

The only route left for any government to get money is by auctioning their goverments bonds and notes to investments banks at Wallstreet, London, Frankfurt, Paris; interest rates depend on rating agencies. The US government in particular found an escape by selling their bonds to China by the masses, as a swap for Chinese products to be exported to the US.
In a nutshell: financing western governments is the exclusive right of commercial banks (and to China in case of the US).

Do forget that money is backed by gold reserves; perhaps the 2% is, but for the rest it ended since 1971 when Nixon announced to postpone dollars redeemable for gold by addressing the nation on Tv. The pause never ended and the gold standard has been abolished.
European countries aksing their gold back from the FED have had refusing replies since 1953.
Angela Merkel’s request in 2013 including an audit has been dissaproved several times and Germany didn’t get back a single bar.
Since 1953 the FED refuses audits and does not return gold on request. What is plausible to think? That the FED sold the gold already a long time ago. Could it just not be a security measure? It could be, but no government official may enter the vaults, not even the president, any prime minister or chancellor. Does it make sense? Of course not.
What makes sense is that the FED has stolen all gold already a long time ago.

Some countries are geographically lucky so they can make money by oil, gas and minerals… as long as it is in state hands. If not, they depend on taxes from the private mining companies… but by setting them up multinational they avoid it (called offshoring).
Those earth-rich countries were conquered by the West, except Russia and China. About 55 years ago half the world was still in the hands of Britain, France and Netherlands parasitise those continents for own benefit and imposing their corrupt moralities and fraudulent ways, including the Middle-East. Natives were kept poor. Spain gave up South- and Mid-America already a longer time ago.
But in the end, the West left unnatural dividing borders leaving different Peoples and industrial government manipulation for keeping access to earth’s resources.
The US makes a difference as well as they were never conquered since the industrial revolution. Some European countries are just geographically lucky like Germany, Sweden and Norway. However, the US must defend the petrodollar at all cost to not let the entire western classic capital socio-economy collapse.

Side note:
I’m not pro-left, mid or pro-right. As long as we live in this classic capital socio-economics, they all make no difference. But must the rather extreme free market capital doctrine be the only way? That has become a private shadow dictatorship, as explained further.

In Europe it is prohibited for the ECB or national central banks to finance governments directly since Dec. 2007 (Lisbon treaty). It basically parasites countries with less earth resources. In the US the FED obstructs it by unprecedented ultra-low interest rates since 2002 after 9/11. This is also the point in time where the swap market accelerated big time and ran completely out of hand, as you can see the graph above of the ‘Credit Default Swaps’.

Okay, but the insurance banks do have own money to cover right?
No they don’t. The international banking Basel-accords also permits them to have little own capital as well (2-7%). They are covered by hedge funds and private equities. If all fails, governments will have to sell their public assets fast under pressure of the IMF to hedge funds and private equities. That means dirt cheap since it’s under pressure of time. Hedge funds and private equities know this in advance all too well since it’s likely to happen some day, and they don’t need any rating whatsoever. Hedge funds and private equities therefore are the true parasites of finance.

Power lobbies in international governments prevent regulation and alternative finance routes very aggressive. They accomplish interbanking accords and interbanking regulations make it to actual law like EU directive CRD-IV which is basically a full copy of the interbanking Basel-accords. In the US and EU, lobbies actually do write the legislation to be prepared for the congressmen. You don’t believe this? Then do research how lobbies and political agancies actually work and where their offices are located. Basically they don’t hang their company name outside on the streets, but they are there in New York around Wallstreet, Washington, Brussels and around any national governmental house.

Both the ECB and FED however buy governments bonds and notes from the second-hand market, so that the US and EU countries can auction off more to the commercial banks to get money… at interest, increasing debt, so banks scooping up interest and premiums perpetually. Buyers of government bonds and notes (investment banks) are covered by very little own capital on their balance sheets (made possible by the Basel-accords). About 95-98% on their balance sheets is loaned. With that debt as backing they create more loans by using swap technique.
Debt is mainly real estate and government loans (auctioned off governments bonds).

So with existing debt new public debt is created permanent. Banks scoop up money based on nothing, the public bleeds constant by ever-increasing debt and interest.

This on a swap based money system crashed in 2008 and has never been changed.

And all it took was one major event to bring down the house of cards. The failure of Fannie and Freddie tipped the first domino, AIG and a chain reaction followed. The Obama administration and Congress has actually enforced a control system with the SEC. The Dodd–Frank Wallstreet Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into federal law by Obama on July 21, 2010. Wallstreet simply changed the name into ‘Swap Future’ to go around all controls and so nothing has changed today Sep. 2013. Free market creativity at its highest.

Regulating the overly-complex ‘swamp’ monster however is impossible. What should have been done is limiting new creation and volume, and restrict the use in steps. This however does not serve the construction of wealth by growth and profiteering, so will never be done in both the US and EU.

National debts can only grow exponential simply because it’s how the entire money and value system is constructed. No western government has alternate financing routes without debt and without depending fully on the commercial banks, thus rating angencies (rating decides the height of interest to be paid).

No lessons are learned whatsoever.
__

Conclusion

Survive-A-Down-Economy1The western economy is crippled permanent since it is based on a pyramid scheme, hence fraud.

The US shows some progress as it has extended the national debt exponential as per usual historic trend. Each presidential term adds debt unproportional more than the former with few exceptions. It’s de trend since de FED came into existence. It’s the way it is setup. 

The game has been perpetual:
Right ease monetary regulations and make debt cheap, created by their contacts at banks. Public falls for it and the government needs it. Owning a house was promoted by dirt cheap loans promoted by governments, backed by their banking contacts. Left need vast amounts of spending so they spiral up more debt, meanwhile bring back some monetary controls using their same contacts. Right ease or obstruct regulations again, and spiral up more debt by cheap ‘smart’ financial products using  their networks again. Left… repeat; bring back some controls and influence, then spiral up debt. And so the national curve of debt is guaranteed. Right… repeat… Because it is all one big happy money and power family. Parties are a farce.

Is there a way out via classic politics?
No, money creation is in the exclusive hands of private commercial banks based on swap technique. Left, mid, right, they all need money. And alternative ‘taps’ have been ‘welded’ tight by corruption.
The only way out it to force a system change hard by us as public.

An exponential trend curve by definition has a point where it accelerates up all of the sudden; this point was reached in 1980. It’s called the ‘hockey stick’ and was expected to happen decades ago, but political terms and tangled interests only think short-term perpetually (see US public debt curve above).

History shows that money systems only change after a big war. The last change was after Vietnam, but it only was made much worse by ending the gold standard. Syria and Iran are the few countries left not participating in the western financial ‘contract’. Russia is turning away from it since 2010 and China has always been totally independent. The West never succeeded to set up a western based central bank in these countries. This actually works against the western capital socio-economic definition of wealth. 

Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Norway do very well, how come.
Governments there have always protected themselves against the western ‘transatlantic’ doctrine. The Canadian dollar is linked to the US-dollar but not too tangled. The swap market has little grip on Canada. Sweden, Denmark, Norway never adopted the euro. Although Sweden and Denmark signed the treaty they are postponing the euro permanent. Denmark has demanded exceptions in treaties. And… Canada, Sweden, Norway, they have oil, gas and minerals to sell to the rest of the world.
__

Corruption, highly tangled interests

round_table05_01Almost all western dominant top men meet in transatlantic top networks; governmental, media, magazines, papers, finance, consultancies, manufacturers, oil companies, and scientists are interconnected tangled deep in numerous institutions like:

Trilateral commission, Bilderberg conference, Club of Rome, UN, Nato, IMF, WTO, WHO, Worldbank, BIS, ECB, FED, IMF, world leading banks, world charities, IPCC, Royal houses of UK-Netherlands and main stream multinationals, media and papers (almost all investor-owners in the axes UK-US-Netherlands-Belium-France-Germany can be counted on two hands).

Do check all track records, connections and biographies and you’ll notice it’s the case.

Alumni men do pledge loyalty amongst each other above God, country and political parties.
They pledge to always help each other above anything else. It’s how student alumni corps works.

Their ‘signature’ has always fitted somewhere in a mix of a certain back ground (both or either):
compliant-preserving-jewish-christian-right-capital.

Political ‘pacts’ per nation:

UK ——————– Conservatives-Labour
US ——————– Democrats-Republicans-Libertarian
Germany ———— CDU/CSU-FDP
Netherlands ——– CDA-CU-VVD-D66-PvdA
Belgium ————- CD&V-VLD
France ————— UMP-SP

Some simple quick examples:

Kerry (democrat) and Bush (republican) use similar language, morality and rhetoric.
Reason: both are active skull and bones alumni from Yale.
In 2004 the rally for presidency was an embarrassment; both didn’t make the debates difficult.
Pure ‘Disney’ Tv it was. 
It wouldn’t have made a difference who won actually.

Top 4-5 financiers:
Romney: directly by Credit Suisse, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.

Obama:   indirectly by The Economist, JP Morgan via Google, Harvard, and University of California (UC).
___-_-___Sponsor Bill gates has his own investment-LLC.

Lynn Forrester de Rothschild owns The Economist group, a Rothschild…
Mark Yudo, President of UC from 16 June 2008 – 6 Sep. 2013. A jewish professor mainly financed by David Geffen, yet another jewish millionaire, business man and owner of Dreamworks with Steven Spielberg as director. Geffen’s banker is JP Morgan. Geffen raised 1,3 million for Obama’s campaign;
it flowed via 100 million donations to UC. 

Harvard’s finance and investments run via the notrious corrupt and crooked Bank of America.

Romney-Netanyahu are close friends. They both worked at the Boston Consultancy Group which is also known to be a cover-up for intelligence, and is very strong force in positioning politicised top men from the world of business like McKinsey, KPMG, Ernst & Young, Deloitte and consultancies like these. The client list includes the Russian Ministery of Energy, Ford, US Agency for International Development, IBM, Pfizer, Tata Group, EU Phare Program.

American Secretaries of finance are always feared men from private Wallstreet; Paulson ex-VP Goldman Sachs, Geithner ex-president of the FED NY and JP Morgan, Jack Lew ex-COO of Citigroup… Further back in history shows similar patterns.
Axes countries UK-US-Netherlands-Belium-France-Germany… same ‘story’.

The IMF is filled with former compliant-preserving-jewish-christian-right-capital secretaries of finance, central bankers, members of the Trilateral commission, financial auditors of media companies, big investors, et cetera. These super influential job hops are like a revolving door from one to another setting everything in place for private interest.

President of the ECB is Mario Draghi, ex-VP Goldman Sachs.

Especially Deutsche Bank is super dominant in Continental Europe. Former German-Dutch politicians and ambassadors there are top non-executives in the board. They also deliver board members to Shell like Josef Ackermann. 
DB was a main contributor of WWII by the US-educated Rothschild family which was the reason it was split up into pieces afterwards. After 1980 and deregulation by neoliberalism the parts fused again into the conglomerate it has become again. With Goldman Sachs they covered up the Greek national debt by using swap technique.

Shell delivers many leading politicians, have non-executives from Deutsche Bank in the board, etc.
Same story with BP. Same story with most big influential internationals.

Cameron is a direct descent from King Willem IV of England… An imperialist pur sang.

These are quick examples not even touching the tip of the iceberg… the list of tangled power is long.

Details: The Elite the Puppets and the Muppets (Dutch).
___

Dollar as western reserve coin and petrodollar

In 1944 (Bretton Woods system) the US and Europe agreed the US dollar being the western reserve coin with more fixed exchange rates.
Commodities (oil, gas, gold, silver) are priced and traded international by US dollars, called ‘Petrodollar’.
Henry Kissinger and Saudi-Arabia have constructed this after Nixon ended the gold standard in 1971.

Kissinger did this as the cold war and the war in Vietnam had spiraled up US debt to a point enough gold wasn’t left to pay for. Many European countries demanded their gold back. The FED refused.
The petrodollar became the exclusive world base currency backed by world trade of oil and gas.

It explains cheap petrol prices in the US (in Europe equivalency of a gallon can easily be 5.00 US dollar), but most vital is that the value of the US dollar highly depends on the trade of commodities.
The West will do everything in its 
power to keep that key economic system going as the entire western capital socio-economy will literally fall from its cliff otherwise.
__

Energy, minerals and demise of the Petrodollar 

1l-imageThe Middle-East has the world’s biggest energy resources. Competing transport to Europe, Russia, China, Pakistan and India is evident. Oil and gas are transported by pipes and Suez canal, to China via Russia, and to Pakistan and India by proposed lines via Afghanistan. European gas depends majorly on Gazprom, Russia. It has threatened reduced delivery at higher prices earlier.
Gas for China is delivered by and through Russia exclusive as well. Russia holds a gas-monopoly. Hence, Europe needs access to the Persian Gulf, the 3rd biggest gas pocket, the South Pars / North Dome field. Qatar
(pro-west) has proposed that particular line,
Qatar-SaudiArabia-Jordan-Syria-Turkey-Europe.

Arab Gas Pipeline Egypt-Jordan-Syria-Turkey is strategic for Gazprom. Assad has proposed the line Syria-Irak-Iran to the same field connecting it; a slap in Qatar’s face.

French foreign minister Dumas alleged the British began operations in Syria anyway, although Assad refused to sign agreements with France and Britain in 2009 to protect Russia, and Syria (like Iran and Afghanistan) isn’t a WTO member. Qatar has established a commanding position as the world’s leading gas exporter for its South Pars / North Dome field and wants to sell to Europe.

Minerals, oil and gas needed for the West are located around Syria. Great mineral fields are in Israel. The west can’t be successful without those: copper, phosphate, bromide, potassium, clay, silicium, sulfur, asphalt, manganese, and natural gas. Without western access, no computers and basic first needs like electricity, energy, soil furtilizer (high concentrated efficient food production), et cetera.

After the First Zionist convention in Basel 1897, jewish settlements grew to current Israel like dots all over the place (British soil between 15 May 1948 and WWI, and Ottoman Empire’s soil before that). They kept expanding by clever (but basically illegal) land acquisition schemes, connecting and new ones arose. The first big land acquisition amongst smaller jewish settlements in that region before WWII was made by Rothschild’s investment imperium.
He was the leading financier of the Zionist movement and his family and networks like his own brother,  Morgan and Rockefeller had seats in western politics, in the League of Nations and later the UN. He simply needed access to those earth resources for business.

The holocaust was horrific but also a perfect moment to claim mandatory jewish homeland by the Zionist agenda. Arab Palestinians have lived there for centuries but were pushed out fast and by aggression. A Civil war began November 1947 – May 1948. May 15 was the date the British mandate of Palestine ended and the Jewish Agency proclaimed the State of Israel a day earlier. The UN accepts it immediately.

Sidenote:
Zionism
isn’t to be confused with a religion. It’s a form of nationalism organising a jewish state opposing assimilation with other societies. It is in essence racist and with the agenda to grab as much land as possible to achieve the goal as quickly as possible at all cost and within all means at hand, no matter what. And top jewish international politicised business instincts have dominated the form becoming an extreme right capital socio-economy to make it happen. Nearly all politcal parties in Israel carry the term ‘Zionist’. Netanyahu has confirmed last year Israel is just a jewish right economy. Orthodox jews showed dissapointment by damaging the holocaust memorial in 2012: “Is this our promised land?”. It does collide with their view and it does collide with islamic morality. Especially jewish tradition opposes islam and expressly American based Zionist lobby AIPAC is very dominant.
It claims jewish prosecution by islam over millennia. Most interesting is that islam came into existence in the 7th century. It was Roman Popes condemning jews forbidding them to join guilds, limit them and withhold them from public jobs and tasks keeping them in ghettos in Rome under most humiliating conditions. Since trade was left for the jewish Roman society, they specialised profoundly in the business of gold, diamonds, money changing, trade and investment capitalisation.

Israel became a quick aggressive expanding nation of (illegal) settlements armed quick and modern from Europe, US and Russia; big business. At the dismay of Arabs since they were driven out by terror with no room for opposition, and without any rights. Many strong opposing groups began to form as anti-western reaction; PLO, Hezbollah, Hamas, Jihad and more. 

TURKISH_PIPELINE_PROJECTSjgflaToday, private companies (mixed with politics) are building competing energy lines through Syria, Iran, Iraq and also Afghanistan, and the competing line Qatar-SaudiArabia-Jordan-Syria-Turkey-Europe. In 2011 ex-queen Beatrix has lobbied the latter in Qatar since the royal family had shares of Shell. Dated 11-09-13, the area of the line under construction in Syria is in rebel hands by western support.
A coicidence? Not plausible as it breaks Russian Gazprom’s monopoly.
All western weapon trade may go via Qatar and Saudi Arabia, since Qatar has been granted the FIFA World Football in 2022.

A coincidence as well? Of course not. Big sport events have always followed western self-interest capital and politics. Western companies may construct and build all infrastructure leaving no relevance later while the weapon transit is open. Usually the local deal is they are exempt from taxes. Do the locals benefit from this on the long-term? Absolutely not, it’s pure western parasiting and draining.
Al Jazeera is based in Qatar. It copies CNN as it sees it as its competitor. It shows western perception (so western propaganda).

Afghanistan is a story on its own.

It was a pro-poor, pro-farmer (socialistic) society. The USSR backed and supported development.
In 1978, President Daud Khan began to build a massive military after India’s nuclear test, to counter Pakistan’s armed forces and Iranian military influence in Afghanistan’s politics.
A final pre-war treaty of Dec. 1978 allowed the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) to call upon the USSR for military support. During its first 18 months of rule, the PDPA applied a Soviet-style program of modernizing reforms, many of which were viewed by conservatives as opposing islam.
Decrees setting forth changes in marriage customs and land reform were not received well by a population deeply immersed in tradition and islam, particularly by the powerful land owners who were harmed economically by the abolition of usury (though usury is prohibited in islam) and the cancellation of farmers’ debts. By mid-1978 rebellion started attacking the local military garrison in the Nuristan region of eastern Afghanistan. Soon civil war spread throughout the country. 

In Sep. 1979, Deputy Prime Minister Hafizullah Amin seized power after a palace shootout that resulted in the death of President Taraki. Over two months of instability overwhelmed Amin’s regime as he moved against his opponents in the PDPA and the growing rebellion.
And Russia intervened.
After the Soviet invasion, the mujahideen was formed as a resistance to drive out Russia. Al Qaeda became a branch during this Afghan war (1979-1989). The US supported them financially via the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), the security service of Pakistan. The program of the CIA was called ‘Operation Cyclone’.

But the branch became extreme anti-western, specially anti-American. islam is very social and socialistic by nature like sharing and 0%-interest loans. Profiteering, usury, bribery, abundance, and getting very rich over other people is seen as deep evil. But most of all, the Taliban (supported by Al Qaeda, thus CIA) had expected some power in government, but were left empty handed. 
Western capital socio-economics however is based on dual values with the idea that basically all is for sale, so it collides fundamentally. And, Afghanistan has always been opium exporter number one of the world (farmers), so western pharmaceutical and chemical companies depend on it like Bayer, Leo, Procter and Gamble, Novartis, Pfizer, et cetera.

Attacking the Twin towers is most horrific, but here is a story from another angle:
Americans relate the towers to freedom. Nice, but they actually stood as a result of extreme corruption. Investor was David Rockefeller. This family business imperium has always been heavy involved in taking political offices for their benefit of business and super profits. It even delivered the petrol additive for the Nazi regime and Zyklon B for the gas chambers. Rockefeller made a deal in 1966; an agreement made between involved parties, the two governors, the mayor of New York, the New York City Council, the construction company and the Hudon Port Authority. Shortly there after in 1966 construction began. The deal was that Rockefeller was exempt from Harbour taxes. The rest became a big show for the public as the towers were constantly pitched as icons of the free West.
First exhibited in 1939 at the Worlds Fair in New York the idea of the World Trade Center towers was presented with the concept of “World peace through trade” which is the western socio-economic agenda, proven to be false over and over by corruption in the über top resulting in bubbles, crises, the petrodollar, a crooked money system, media and war industry needed to keep it all going. It’s what this article is about after all… Conservative islam opposes it hard, and western politicised business is known to play both sides to keep the western doctrine going. 

4qV2lOil and gas lines are proposed through Afghanistan connecting Pakistan and India; the Trans-Afghanistan pipeline developed by the heavy criticized Asian Development Bank (ADB), to be completed in 2017.

As Russia refused using their pipes after it withdrew from the project (after the Taliban and Al Qaeda had withdrawn), and Afghanistan being nonmember of the WTO, an independent line is needed, financed by the ADB. In fact, it would be the first independent western line breaking Gazprom’s gasmonopoly. The first thing Nato did after invading Afghanistan? Secure the areas for western construction.

Now it get’s really interesting. Guess who is dominant member of the ADB: Mario Draghi, member of the BIS, Worldbank’s IBRD President of the ECB, Chairman of the G20′s Financial Stability Board (FSB) and ex-VP Goldman Sachs Europe.

Do people actually fight for all this?

Yes, like western media they see a political-business network, ‘puppets’ showing national propaganda but never true stories.

I call it ‘Disneyland’ media.

Secret services do organise turmoil by infiltration, dollars and social media, and they do so active. The CIA, MI5/6, Mossad and FSB (former KGB) have notoriously proven to do so. Without no doubt, national secret services do the same. Is it plausible for four Arab countries starting a public rebellion at near same time? In fact, it would be a precedent, very naive thinking afterwards. Statistical chances are nearly impossible as well. Gazprom’s monopoly protected by Assad and Qatar-Europe’s interest to break it, has been explained earlier, as well as the Petrodollar being the world’s reserve coin for the US.

And there is the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Not joining or cooperate, hence not joining or agree with the western free market capital socio-economic doctrine while having strategic earth’s resources or laying in a transit path) eventually results in destabalisation by western under cover forces to conquer that country to forward the strategic trade project for western private benefit. Bribery, demonisation, economic hit men, trade boycotts, hiring terrorists or rebels via secret services, anti-propaganda, nuclear program condemnation… And if that all hasn’t worked it is simply invaded by false flag.

Khadafi never joined the WTO and was on the verge establishing Libya’s own central bank backed by gold again, so making it an independent oil state. It was said he had left Libya into shatters and corruption, but the actual reason why the West intervened was purely driven by self-interest. To bring back the western based monetary system to protect oil trade for the West.

Syria and Iran are the only independent Middle-East countries left (non WTO members) Iran the only independent oil nation left. Britain and French interests in energy sources in the Middle-East are tremendous. The US less as it wants to be energy independent by 2020. However, the US will never give up the petrodollar since that’s a guarantee dollar flow by world trade always needed for the never-enough western capital socio-economic doctrine.

In 2003 Iraq wasn’t a WTO member either and started to trade oil by euros which plummeted the dollar to the euro by 20-25%. It’s the actual reason to invade Iraq (by false flag). There after a western central bank has been established, oil from Iraq is again traded by the dollar ever since and Iraq is pressed to enter the WTO in 2016.

China member of the WTO is too big for the West. Like Russia, it has shifted away from the Petrodollar buying commodities with their own currency since 2010, the Yuan. All BRICs countries (Brasil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) have allied to accept the Yuan as reserve coin and exchange for trade. Japan has joined in June 2013. During the BRICs’ summit March 2013 it was agreed upon to form a joint bank to bypass the IMF and World Bank. China is the biggest producer of gold and is ‘building’ a stock to actually back the Yuan.

Since the dollars is backed by nothing, perpetual expansion of trade on the dollar is a must, so this is a big threat for the western world dollar based economy. Iran and Syria have allied with the BRICs in silence. China will need vast access to scares energy resources of the Middle-East on top of existing competition between the West, Russia and upcoming India. Europe, India, Russia and China have invested too little in energy independence. Solar panels and wind mills are run on immense government subsidies, so are fake developments. The shift to the Yuan as well fundamented alternative reserve coin and for direct exchange of trade will be unprecedented.
__

Military industry

As real estate has crashed, national and public debt has been spiraled out of control everywhere and the swap market remaining unchanged, the western economy has ‘landed’ hard on its face permanent for years. On top of that, room for rapid international economic expansion is demising.

And in the western wealth model, growth is a must otherwise the whole system collapses.

Politicians keep ‘shouting’ balance sheets of banks, national, debts, public debt and deficits need to be fixed. However, that distracts from the core system problem.

The core system problem is:  money  =  debt x 100 by the swap market  =  Value  = ‘Air’.
And no one talks about putting the swap market back into the box and changing this financial socio-economic ‘contract’.

War industry remains. That’s the highest pyramid of the money system. If all fails, that’s the only ‘rescue’ to make big profits needed for the transatlantic capital socio-economic doctrine. It’s the actual reason WWII started. The DAP was financed by German-American top 5 investment families, many of them secular right jewish (Zionists) helped by the NY Union bank where Prescott Bush also had a seat (also member of skull and bones).

Do you see a WWIII in all this? I do and i simply prophet it coming.
Preserving free market capital hardheaded thinking and self-interest obstructs the necessary changes for the better.
Or… perhaps… do so deliberately.
__

What to do… Resist from all fibres in your body

1.     Forget status. You can’t live from it and it’s nothing.

2.     Stop consuming (consumer strike). Don’t use more than needed. And the system will fall.

3.     Get off the energy grid if you can. Or use as little as possible. Go very far with this.
        There are numerous methods. Buy a solar lamp for a few euros or dollars. Place them outside
__-__to charge, and place them inside in the evening.
        Can you wash dishes and some clothes by hand? Then do so, or alternate.
        Perhaps you can collect rain water for certain use in the house.
        Turn down the main water tap by half.
        Outside lights: turn them off permanent even at Xmas. It’s pure nonsense basically.
        Air conditioning, consider it as a crime: the body will adept to heat within a few weeks. Off.
        Never leave anything on standby, turn it off.

4.     Food: consider that having and preparing an abundance makes no sense.
        Never buy and use more than needed. consider throwing away is just silly.

5.     Read the detailed manual of your heating and boiler systems if its relative new-modern.
        Has it automatic air venting and can the pump sustain idleness, then turn it off, when not needed.
____Turn it on when needed or run it at least once a week. Be careful with older systems !

6.     Don’t put more money on your bank account needed to pay bills.

7.     If renting is cheaper, then don’t buy a house. You need a roof and comfort not perpetual debt.

8.     Can a car be shared with more families? If so, why owning one, it’s silly.

9.     Can you use a bicycle for transport? Why not using it.

10.   If you have a mortgage, do early payments? Absolutely not, why should you.
        Rule 1 in finance: keep money as long as you can, pay as late as possible within conditions.
        Why not save that money at interest. Who knows what the world is later. And if you have to
        pay back your mortgage then you have saved for it yourself.
        And why should you give your money to the bank in advance anyway so they can play with it.

11.    Do not ever join any defence force. It’s nothing to be proud of as you are nothing but a number for
         the big play. They don’t really care about your concern. And basically it’s cadaver obedience.

12.    Spread the word so a critical mass becomes well-informed.

13.    Turn off your Tv.

         It’s ‘Disney news’ and commercials in the hands of a few. It’s ignorance, biased dumbing down.
         Get news from internet by real independent searchers.
         Read news forums. Do make certain they refer to unique sources and not copy-paste news feeds.
         Make sure there are no influences by any faith, political bias and commerce.
         Do you see some national logos and colours used? Then consider it biased.
         Research the owner of sites, all the way up to the highest holder.

         Do your own research. Google biographies of top names in politics, business and media.
         Cross-links evidently are common interests. It’s how it works… Quid pro quo; ‘this for that’;
         a way of exchange of personal services.

         2013 International press agencies are limited. Most is copy-pasted from their sources

         US ————————— Bloomberg, CNN, UPI, AP
         UK ————————— Reuters, BBC
_____Australia ——————– AAP
         Germany ——————- DPA, IPS
         France ———————- AFP
         Netherlands ————— ANP
         Belgium ——————— Belga
         Spain ———————— Agencia Internacional
         China ———————— Xinhua
         Russia ———————– Interfaks, ITAR-TASS

         2013 Concentrated owners of Tv media US, UK, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, France

_____Sanoma (Aatos Erkko) —- NU.nl, SBS, Net5, Veronica Firm right.
_____GE (JP Morgan) ————- Comcast, NBCUniversal, —- Firm right.
_____________-______________CNBC, MSNBC,
_____ProSiebenSat.1 ————– ProSieben, kabel1, ———— Pro-right, simple leisure, copied news.
_____________________-______SAT.1, sixx, N24
_____Rupert Murdock ————– Fox, Sky, News Corp, ——– Pro-Libertarian.
_______________________-____Freeview, NGC
_____Bertelsmann (Mohn) ——– RTLGroup, M6, n-tv, ———– Pro-right preserving christian.
___________________-________Channel5 (Five,5)
_____Van Thillo, De Nolf ———- VTM, 2BE, JIM, Vitaya ——- Pro-right-christian.
____________________________________________________Van Thillo is ex-Bertelsmann.
_____Baron Michael Grade ——- iTV, Channel4, Freeview  —- Zionist, UK-conservative ex-politician.
_____Bouygues ——————— TF1———————————- Pro-right.
         Time Warner (Morgan) —- CNN, HBO, CW —– Firm pro-republican (links Bush family).
_____Sumner Redstone ———- CBS, MTV, CW —– Zionist, so extreme right.
         Walt Disney —————— ABC ——————– Zionist, extreme right.
_____Emir of Qatar —————– Al Jazeera ———— Pro-west, competition CNN, same news, right.
___________________________-_________________Nearly all ex-BCC employees.
         State (subsidised) ———– PBS, NPO, BBC, Channel4, Freeview, BR, ZDF, ARD, RBB, SWR,
_____________-_-____________ NDR, WDR, France2-3-4-5-Ô-24, RTBF, VRT, TV5Monde.

_____Firm right, pro-right and zionistic equals what brings highest profits, so easy flip flopping
__-__ as exploitation of broadcasting have always been their core business.
_____Balanced world news in the US hardly have existed as the society is free market capital based.
_____Europe had balanced left-mid-right media just before a decade ago. It’s pushed to mid-right by
_____heavy commerce, zionism, conservative mid-othodox right politics and business tycoons.

_____(MS)NBC had a debacle of being called ‘pro-white house’, but it’s just entertainment.
_____Aatos Erkko (Sanoma) located in Helsinki Finland was refused expansion to Russia by Putin.
_____Most all above media tycoons own a vast majority of the mainstream newspapers, magazines
_____and radio along with traditional ‘barons’ of the press. Simply too many to list them here.

         Conclusion: do not expect critical and independent news via old media, with few exceptions.

         Turn off all paying media plans.
         Want to see a movie? Download a torrent, convert that free to mpeg or DVD or a USB stick and
         plug that in. Read you Tv manual what formats it can read. Mpeg, Mp4, etc.

14.    Ignore existing authorities, doctrines, politics, business, churches, media, science…
_____they do not want
to alter anything. They prefer status quo otherwise it’s game over for them.

15.    Organise mass demonstrations.

YOU will have to force another way hard by not conform to it all.

If you are spiritual or prefer a faith, you can practice that at home. Why should a church, synagogue or mosque be needed. Dominant western ‘fathers’ have been connected to conservative right media and politics by tradition. That’s biased, so avoid them.
Look at Australia since 7 Sep. 2013 as recent example. The new prime minister wanted to be a priest. He too is conservative-right-capital. First thing he has announced are major cuts…
Has he announced any changes of the disfunctional socio-economic ‘format’? None at all.

Like the rest of the western world, Australian Tv is in the hands of just a few. Rupert Murdock dominates and about a quarter is in the hands of Fairfax. Both dominate the newspapers as well along with West Australian Newspapers and the Harris Group. All are collaborating as the AAP.
The new prime minister is pushing the right agenda forward hard as if nothing has been learned.

Look at Europe and America, all of those nation’s constitutions are based on religion, so how can governments and its media ever be secular? On paper they are yes, but that’s all just paperwork.

Worse…. all mess of the last decade has been created by a super dominant mix of compliant-preserving-right-jewish-christian-capital officials in highest offices and tangeled in piles of conflicting revolving side functions, everywhere in western countries.

Search the internet.

Balanced and superb internet movies do exist explaining the real world, like;
Zeitgeist, Press.tv, The Real News, LiveLeak.com, How dare they (Dutch), but never stick to routine.
___

Bilderberg conference

A central one-Western-management based on free world trade capital without middle class. Politics and media fully controlled. No growth for the servants, but mega growth for the manipulating top.

Signature: compliant-right-secular-preserving-jewish-christian-capital elitists.

For a long time the majority of people would laugh about the idea of its existence.
However, Prince Bernhard himself talked about it on Dutch national Tv, just before he died. The current prime minister of the Netherlands has referred to it after his internet speech 2 Sept. 2013 in question nr. 14 from the audience. He said he was present and referred to the conference as source of his vision.

We also know he was present last year, as well as all preserving-jewish-christian-right-capital parties.
A week after the conference, the media showed all different parties making a sudden public spending cut programs, agreed within a few days without any disagreements.
Who were not invited? The left winged and nonconformists. Not very balanced is it.
And such quick fixes are normal in politics? Of course not. It’s Bilderberg-timing.
Media showed a spectacle for 2 weeks, but nothing was thrilling about it… it’s all ‘Disney Tv’.

In 2012 the Dutch elections were held in Sep. Media manipulated the outcome big time.
In 2013, German and Australia, the elections were held in Sep. Very manipulated by the concentrated media as well.

And also this year, 2013. Why did they wait with the cut program right after summer holidays close to the dead line?
The Bilderberg-meeting had to come first, so after summer holidays close to deadline there is no room anymore for changes. So short term thinking by government is sustained, Bilderberg decides.

This group from elitist does exist and is an initiative from David Rockefeller and Prince Bernhard.
The original conference was held at the Hotel Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, from 29 to 31 May 1954 and is held in secret throughout the world ever since.
In 2012 it was at the Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia. 2013 In the Grove Hotel in Watford (Hertfordshire), UK. Right after the meeting, big political deals appear in the media, and all parties are close to agree, except left winged parties, but they are not allowed participate. A coincidence? No.

Is it the shadow government of the world?

Prince Bernhard said it was just a think tank of world top influentials from private business, science, media, banks, churches and politics. Why was it out the media for decades? The deal was media was part but without any reporting, and internet didn’t exist for the masses not just too long ago. And as there are not so many media owners, they can easily be managed by conditions for attending.
Among global topinvestors attendees are names like Rothschild, Murdock, JP Morgan, Rockefeller, Geffen, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates… 

All above mentioned media tycoons broadcasting news were present:
Aatos Erkko (also ex-member of the Trilateral Commission and listed as CIA source), Michael Bloomberg, Paul Nitze (Time Warner, Citigroup, World Bank, IMF, ) Sir John Craven (Director of Reuters, ex-Director of Deutsche Bank, ex-chairman of Deutsche Morgan), Father and son Mohn (Bertelsmann), GE, JP Morgan, Disney, Rupert Murdock, Sumner Redstone, Bouygues (also meeted with the EU)…
And a long list of world powerful attendees continues…

The general public is fooled by a dazzling mass of media brands and piles of sub brands. Little do they actually know those belong to a concentration of holdings or joined ventures as you read earlier. They simply define the finance, strategy and programming.

And all nice and well; the ‘chain of command’ in a business is rather simple.

     Investor  →  appoints board (puppets)  →  appoints CEO (muppet)  →  working class (sheep).

     Investor  →  appoints board (puppets)  →  appoints professors (muppets)  →  select top students.

Selected top students go into politics, business, science, media… and the same wheel rotates.

It’s really that simple. So a think tank? Perhaps, but the influence can only be profound.

Have you ever experienced your contribution was very sensible and listened to but never adopted, and when you persisted you were ignored or manipulated to step down? That’s why. A feeling of participation is just a feel-good.

The male student corps are about pledging loyalty amongst each other and to conform authority. Doing so will be more likely providing a wealthy future gifted by conforming peers. So conforming is deeply rooted in high offices.
Women and male student corps have been separated for centuries, just lately men corps do admit females. But the 60+ generation is mostly at power at the very top and they are still from that male imperial morality.

These Bilderberg conferences decides the presidential campaigns receiving the highest finance. All candidates seen fit have always been invited. It is a kind of audition. They mingle, the conference votes. Then it’s simple: the highest financed, supported by media ‘mass steering’ strategies from these same investors, grooms the highest voters, so gets the job. The people had a fun show for a while and could perhaps even release quite fanatical rage, rant and anger;  if the correct party for them comes to power it’s all going to fixed right? (lol). Well, do dream on…

Do you actually believe you live in democracy, freedom, similar opportunities and equality? Wake up (!)

Prime ministers and presidents in their 40s are not the top, they are just chosen (sponsored) ‘students’ summing up what the interest group at the top wants. That’s where the terms ‘old-boys-network’ come from, and ‘it’s a men’s world’. Well, it simply is.

Prime ministers, presidents, news readers, all read from teleprompter and plexiglas autocue.

Investors decide the finance, the board the strategy, the CEO makes it executable.

Is it different in politics? In the back rooms no, on Tv for the public yes but that’s just a muppet show.
___

All mess is constructed deliberately?

speakoutI dearly wished different plausibilities to think otherwise. But is that being realistic?

We can put our head in the sand and ignore it.
But in the end you or your children will live in a world with little personal freedom, restricted manoeuverability and extreme low paid jobs.
All are kept poor and totally depending on an invisible private top without any middle class and providing no wealth for the low paid servants.

Do you wish a world like that for yourself or your children?

The time has come to act and stand up !!